UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.           )

 

 Filed by the Registrant Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

 

Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

 

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
No fee required.
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
 (1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 (2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 (3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 (4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 (5)Total fee paid:
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 (1)Amount Previously Paid:
 (2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 (3)Filing Party:
 (4)Date Filed:


DEAR FELLOW
STOCKHOLDERS

 

 

 

Thomas C. Gentile III

PRESIDENT AND

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

 

 

 

Robert D. Johnson

CHAIRMAN

 

March 11, 201920, 2020

On behalf of the Board of Directors, we are delighted to invite you to attend the 20192020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (the “Company” or “Spirit”). We hope you can join us on Wednesday, April 22, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. at the Grand Hyatt DFW, 2337 S. International Pkwy., Dallas, TX 75261. Details of the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting are included in the attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and accompanying Proxy Statement.

While 20182019 was a challengingan unprecedented year for the Company due to the worldwide grounding of the B737 MAX, our largest program. Spirit itfaced many challenges resulting from the grounding, including needing to reduce costs designed for a production rate of 57 aircraft per month, designing storage plans for grounded aircraft, and having to face difficult decisions about rightsizing our workforce.

Last year was also one of growth for Spirit as we continued to execute our diversification strategy. We announced our acquisition of select Bombardier aerostructures and aftermarket assets, which represents a time of great learningnew frontier for Spirit and adaptation that has preparedwill expand our Airbus work content and give us well for successa very significant work package on the A220 - a fully integrated wing. We also expanded our defense profile by acquiring Fiber Materials Inc. (the acquisition closed in 2019January 2020), which provides us additional exposure to defense customers and beyond. The majority of issues impactedbrings us key work content in the Boeing 737 program, driven by rate increases, supplier limitations,rapidly expanding hypersonics space.

We continued to improve our governance profile and expand our capabilities when we welcomed Stephen A. Cambone onto the Board in October. Steve is a learning curve transitioningseasoned defense leader and well-versed in cyber matters. His contributions to the 737 MAX. Likewise, on the A350 XWB program,Board are tremendous, and we experienced weather delays and technology complications at our plant in Kinston, N.C. However, thanks to tremendous efforts on all programs by our employees and suppliers,are grateful for his experience as we ended the year back on our master delivery schedule and met our financial targets.

Highlights of 2018 include:

Reported revenue of $7.222 billion, up 3% from 2017

Delivered on our 2018 capital deployment plan, returning significant value to investors through share repurchases and dividends (including a 20% increase in the quarterly cash dividend amount)

Received multiple innovation and supplier awards from our customers

Pursued commercial,navigate defense and fabrication growth opportunities

Increased research and development efforts and our useincreasingly interconnected marketplace.

We are excited about the Company’s future as we expand our capabilities and expertise. Due to the continued grounding of digital technologies

Signedthe B737 MAX and the resulting lower production rates, challenges will continue. However, we have the right leadership and Board in place to conquer these challenges and help us emerge as a new long-term contract with Boeing covering pricing on a range of programs into the next decade

Engaged with our stockholders and other constituents on various items including strategy, capital deployment, corporate governance, and operational performance

In 2019, we will be challenged to continue to meet rate increases and deliver on time and with high quality on all our programs, all while being relentless in safety and cost control. Yet, we remain confident in our ability to have a successful year.stronger, more diversified company.

We thank you for your continued support of Spirit and look forward to seeing you at the Annual Meeting.


 

Notice of
20192020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

3801 S. Oliver St.
Wichita, KS 67210-2112

 

March 11, 2019

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON APRIL 24, 201920, 2020

 

The Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at http://www.proxyvote.com

The 20192020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (“Spirit” or the “Company”) will be held:

 

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 24, 201922, 2020

11:00 a.m. EasternCentral Time

Fairmont Hotel, Dumbarton RoomGrand Hyatt DFW

2401 M St. NW2337 S. International Pkwy.

Washington, DC 20037Dallas, TX 75261

 

Items of business include:

1.

Election of nine10 nominees as directors;

2.

Advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;

3.

Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2019;2020;

4.

The stockholder proposal regarding enhancing proxy access described in this Proxy Statement, if properly presented atrequesting that the meeting;Board of Directors adopt a bylaw requiring that any Board-approved bylaw amendment be subject to a non-binding stockholder vote; and

5.

The transaction of any other business that properly comes before the meeting.

 

StockholdersThe record date for the Annual Meeting is February 24, 2020 (the “Record Date”). Only stockholders of record of our Class A Common Stock (the “Common Stock”) as of February 25, 2019,the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to receive notice of, and may vote at the Annual Meeting. We are furnishing proxy materials to our stockholders primarily over the internet rather than mailing paper copies. On March 11, 2019, we commenced distributing to our stockholders a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) or a paper copy of the proxy materials and our Annual Report, along with a proxy card or voting information form. The Notice contains instructions on how to access and review the proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report, on the internet and instructions on how to vote. StockholdersYou may vote in person at the Annual Meeting, or by internet, pursuant to the instructions set forth in the Proxy Statement. In addition, if you received a paper copy of the proxy materials, you may vote by completing andphone, or mail (by returning ayour proxy card or voting instruction form). For more detailed information form, as applicable, pursuant toon voting, see the instructions set forth in the Proxy Statement.

section titled “General Information.” Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we hope you will vote as soon as possible.

Pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Company has elected to send you a full set of proxy materials (and notify you of the availability of the Company’s proxy materials on the internet). On March 20, 2020, we commenced mailing proxy materials and our Annual Report to our stockholders.

***

While we intend to hold the meeting in person at this time, we are closely monitoring the coronavirus, or COVID-19, situation. If it becomes necessary for us to hold the meeting by means of remote communication, we will announce that decision promptly, and details on how to participate will be available at https://www.spiritaero.com/2020-annual-meeting.

***

By order of the Board of Directors.

Sincerely,

Stacy Cozad

Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, and Corporate Secretary

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON APRIL 22, 2020:

The Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at http://www.proxyvote.com


Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

76

Matters to Be Voted On at the Annual Meeting

76

Casting Your Vote

76

About Spirit

87

About Spirit’s Director Nominees and Governance Practices

119

About Spirit’s Executive Compensation Program and Practices

1311

1413

Overview

1413

Director Nominees

1413

Voting Standard

18

BOARD AND GOVERNANCE MATTERS

19

The Board’s Role

19

Board Leadership

19

Board Composition

20

Director Tenure and Refreshment

21

Director Education

22

Director Independence

22

Committees

23

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

24

Communications with the Board

25

Commitment to Stockholder Engagement and Responsiveness

25

20182019 Board and Committee Meetings and Attendance

2625

Executive Sessions

26

Overboarding Policy

26

Code of Business Conduct

26

Policy Prohibiting Short Selling, Hedging, and Pledging

26

Succession Planning

26

Compensation of Non-Employee Directors

27

20182019 Director Compensation Table

29

Related Person Transactions

30

STOCK OWNERSHIP

31

Beneficial Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

31

Beneficial Ownership of Major Stockholders

32

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

32

33

Overview

33

Voting Standard

33

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

34

Our 20182019 Named Executive Officers

34

Compensation Overview

35

Aligning Pay with Performance

35

Our Pay Metrics

36

The Company’s Performance

37

CEO Target Pay Compared to Peers

37

Significant Program-Wide Compensation Decisions in 2018

38

20182019 Compensation Program Elements

38

2018Vesting Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards

42

2019 NEO Performance and Compensation Decisions

4243

The Compensation Decision-Making Process

4445

Benchmarking

4546

Independent Compensation Consultant

4647

Clawback Policies

47

Consideration of Advisory Stockholder Vote on Executive Compensation

4647

Compensation Risk Assessment

4648

Other Compensation Elements and Information

4749

Summary Compensation Table

5052

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20182019

5356

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20182019 Fiscal Year End

5458

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year 20182019

5660

Pension Benefits

5761

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

5862

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control

5863

20182019 CEO Pay Ratio

6467

Compensation Committee Report

6467

6568

Overview

65

Voting Standard

65

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

65

Audit and Other Fees

66

Audit Committee Report

66

67

Stockholder Proposal

67

The Board of Directors’ Statement in Opposition

6768

Voting Standard

68

GENERAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE ANNUAL MEETINGPre-Approval Policy

68

Audit and Other Fees

69

Audit Committee Report

69

70

Stockholder Proposal

70

The Board of Directors’ Statement in Opposition

70

Voting Standard

71

GENERAL INFORMATION

72

Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting and Voting

6972

Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for the 20202021 Annual Meeting

7376

Annual Report

7376

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

7477

APPENDIX A

7679

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

7679


Back to Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights certain information contained elsewhere in the accompanying Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all the information you should consider before voting your shares. For more complete information regarding the proposals to be voted uponon at the Annual Meeting and our 20182019 performance, please review the entire Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2019.

We use the terms “Spirit,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” in this Proxy Statement to refer to Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Matters to Be Voted On at the Annual Meeting

Casting Your Vote

Stockholders of record of our Common Stock as of February 25, 2019,24, 2020, may vote their shares using any of the following methods:

BY INTERNET

VIACOMPUTER
Visit www.proxyvote.com

BYMOBILE INTERNETDEVICE

VIATABLETORSMARTPHONEUse your tablet or smartphone
to scan the QR code above

 

BY MAIL

If you received a paper copy
of the materials, completeComplete
and return the enclosed
proxy card or voting
instruction form

BYPHONE

Call 1-800-690-6903

IN PERSON

Vote in person at the
Annual Meeting; see
“General Information — How
Do I Attend the Annual
Meeting”

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    76


Back to Contents

About Spirit

Quick Spirit Facts

 

HEADQUARTERS

Wichita, Kansas

PRODUCTS

Fuselages, wing structures, and propulsion systems for commercial and defense aircraft

WORLDWIDE EMPLOYEES

Approximately 17,50015,000

LOCATIONS

Kansas, Oklahoma,Maine, North Carolina, Scotland, France,Oklahoma and Texas, U.S.; U.K.; France; Malaysia

MAJOR CUSTOMERS

Airbus, Boeing, Bell Helicopter, Lockheed Martin (Sikorsky), Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation, Northrop Grumman, Rolls-Royce

Business Overview

 

Spirit is a leading tier-one global aerostructures provider. We manufacture large aerostructures, including fuselages, wing structures, engine nacelles, pylons, fan cowls, thrust reversers, and systems integration for the world’s premier aircraft. Spirit’s capabilities include metal manufacturing and assembly, precision assembly, and composites manufacturing.

Our engineering capabilities, combined with our capacity for high-volume production, have positioned Spirit as a leading aerostructures supplier to both Airbus and Boeing. For Boeing, we manufacture the 737B737 fuselage, the front section of the 787B787 fuselage, and otherwise manufacture parts for every Boeing commercial aircraft currently in production. Further, for Airbus, we supply fuselage and wing aerostructures content on the A350 XWB and wing aerostructures content on the A320 A330, and A380.A330. We are adding new Airbus content and contracts with other customers with the previously announced Asco and Bombardier acquisitions. Spirit also supplies aerostructures for various regional and business jet programs, including pylons on the A220 and in-development Mitsubishi Regional Jet, as well as nacelles for Rolls-Royce engines used on Gulfstream aircraft.

In addition to producing aerostructures for commercial aircraft, Spirit designs, engineers, and manufactures structural components for military programs. We have been awarded a significant amount of work for Boeing’s P-8, C-40, and KC-46 tanker, all of which are commercial aircraft modified for military use. We are also involved in the development and production of various parts for the Sikorsky CH-53K heavy-lift helicopter and Bell V-280 tiltrotor aircraft. In addition, Spirit is proud to be a member of the Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider industry team. Spirit has invested heavily in research and development labs that enable us to deliver innovation and value on defense programs.

Spirit recently acquired Fiber Materials Inc. (“FMI”), an industry-leading technology company specializing in multi-directional reinforced composites that enable high-temperature applications such as thermal protection systems, re-entry vehicle nose tips, as well as rocket motor throats and nozzles. FMI's unique capabilities have positioned it as a leader in carbon-carbon high-temperature materials for hypersonic missiles, which the U.S. Department of Defense has identified as a national priority.

Spirit expects to complete its previously announced acquisitions of Asco and Bombardier aerostructures in 2020, which will increase its exposure to Airbus, business and regional jets, and defense work.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    87


Back to Contents

Spirit Values and Fundamental Behaviors

 

Values

 

At Spirit, we believe that culture and values play a determiningan important role in the success of corporate strategy. Values are demonstrated in the way we think, act, and ultimately achieve results. The following values guide our ways of working:

Transparency

I am open, honest, and respectful with my communication. I speak up to share my ideas and build trust by making my intentions clear.

Collaboration

I align my actions with others, so we work together to achieve the best outcome in everything we do.

Inspiration

I encourage the best from others, and I lead by example to ensure innovation is a component of our success.

Fundamental Behaviors

 

Safety

Our employees are our greatest asset. We are committed to conducting our operations in a manner that prioritizes the safety and continued health of our employees and other workers. We are committed to continual assessment, training, and investment to execute our safety goals and reduce injuries and incidents.

 

Quality

We are committed to continually improving our quality and delivering onmeeting or exceeding our customers’ quality expectations.

 

 

 

 

On-Time Delivery

Aside from safety and quality,We are committed to successful on-time delivery is our goal.delivery. The success of our customers depends on our ability to meet their delivery expectations consistently. 

 

 

 

 

Customer Focused

Being a trusted partner to our customers is essential to our ability to win profitable new business. We focus on our customers by meeting our operationaloperating commitments and working alongside our customers to develop innovative solutions to their challenges. We are committed to continually investing in new technologies to improve quality, lower costs, and increase production capabilities, in a mutually beneficial way.

 

 

 

 

 

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    8


Back to Contents

About Spirit’s Director Nominees and Governance Practices

Director Nominees

Name

Age

Director

Since

 

Principal Occupation

Independent

Committee

Memberships

Stephen A. Cambone

67

2019

 

Associate Vice Chancellor for Cyber Initiatives, Texas A&M University System

Yes

Audit
Risk

Charles L. Chadwell

79

2008

 

Retired VP/GM of Commercial Engine Operations, GE Aircraft Engines

Yes

Governance (Chair)
Compensation

Irene M. Esteves

61

2015

 

Retired CFO, Time Warner Cable Inc.

Yes

Audit (Chair)
Risk

Paul E. Fulchino

73

2006

 

Retired Chairman, President and CEO, Aviall, Inc.

Yes

Compensation (Chair)
Governance

Thomas C. Gentile III

55

2016

 

President and CEO, Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc.

No

 

Richard A. Gephardt

79

2006

 

President and CEO, Gephardt Group

No

 

Robert D. Johnson, Chairman

72

2006

 

Retired CEO, Dubai Aerospace Enterprise Ltd.

Yes

Compensation
Governance

Ronald T. Kadish

71

2006

 

Retired EVP, Booz Allen Hamilton

Yes

Risk (Chair)
Governance

John L. Plueger

65

2014

 

President and CEO, Air Lease Corporation

Yes

Audit
Risk

Laura H. Wright

60

2018

 

Retired SVP and CFO, Southwest Airlines

Yes

Audit
Risk

Director Nominee Experience

Cambone

Chadwell

Esteves

Fulchino

Gentile

Gephardt

Johnson

Kadish

Plueger

Wright

PublicCompanyCEO

PublicCompanyCFO

AviationOperationsManagement

PublicCompanyBoard

ExecutiveCompensation

RiskManagement

M&A

SeniorGovernment

Cyber

International

Defense

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    9


Back to Contents

Corporate CitizenshipBoard Composition

Spirit’s corporate values are demonstrated through commitments to key community initiatives, from volunteer activities to corporate- and employee-funded grants. Our values are demonstrated through the way we conduct our business and our commitments, which include the following:

CharitableGiving

We believe the opportunity to do business in a community comes with a responsibility to give back. In 2018, more than $2.9 million was donated by Spirit and $2.7 million by Spirit employees to nonprofit organizations supporting education, arts and culture, civic engagement, and health and human services.

CommunityInvolvement

Whether it is serving on the board of a nonprofit or serving meals to the hungry, Spirit leaders and employees give generously of their time and talents. Recent Company-sponsored activities include:

Mentoring students interested in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics careers


Providing school supplies for thousands of U.S. children


Building homes for low-income families


Supporting an orphanage in Malaysia


Refurbishing a children’s respite facility in the U.K.


Creating memorial and recreational areas in local veterans’ centers


GlobalDiversity

We are committed to promoting diversity — not only because it is the right thing to do, but because it drives innovation and growth.

Environment,Health,andSafety

We conduct our business in a manner that protects the environment and promotes the health, safety, and well-being of our employees and our surrounding communities.

EthicsandCompliance

We uphold the highest ethical standards, and we are committed to complying with all laws and regulations applicable to our business and our Code of Business Conduct.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    10


Back to Contents

About Spirit’s Director Nominees and Governance Practices

Director Nominees

 

Name

Age

Director

Since

 

Principal Occupation

Independent

Committee

Memberships

Charles L. Chadwell

78

2008

 

Retired VP/GM of Commercial Engine Operations, GE Aircraft Engines

Yes

Governance (Chair) Compensation

Irene M. Esteves

60

2015

 

Retired CFO, Time Warner Cable Inc.

Yes

Audit (Chair)

Risk

Paul E. Fulchino

72

2006

 

Retired Chairman, President and CEO, Aviall, Inc.

Yes

Compensation (Chair) Governance

Thomas C. Gentile III

54

2016

 

President and CEO, Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc.

No

 

Richard A. Gephardt

78

2006

 

President and CEO, Gephardt Consulting Group

No

 

Robert D. Johnson, Chairman

71

2006

 

Retired CEO, Dubai Aerospace Enterprise Ltd.

Yes

Compensation Governance

Ronald T. Kadish

70

2006

 

Retired EVP, Booz Allen Hamilton

Yes

Risk (Chair)

Governance

John L. Plueger

64

2014

 

President and CEO, Air Lease Corporation

Yes

Audit

Risk

Laura H. Wright

59

2018

 

Retired SVP and CFO, Southwest Airlines

Yes

Audit

Risk

Nominee Qualifications

IndependentPublic
Company

CEO
Experience
Public
Company
CFO Experience
Commercial
Aviation
Operations
Management
Experience
Defense
Aviation
Operations
Management
Experience
Public
Company
Board
Experience
Executive
Compensation
Experience
Risk
Management
Experience
M&A
Experience
Senior
Government
Experience
Chadwell
Esteves
Fulchino
Gentile
Gephardt
Johnson
Kadish
Plueger
Wright

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    11


Back to Contents

Board Composition

 

 

 

 

Corporate Governance Highlights

 

Board Practices

 

Stockholder Protections

   Independent Chairman of the Board

   Proxy access right
   7   8 out of 910 director nominees are independent

 

   Right to call special meetings
   Overboarding policy   All committees are composed solely of independent directors

 

   Right to act by written consent   No poison pill or similar plan
   Ongoing director education program   Separate chairman and CEO

 

   Active stockholder engagement program
   Regular executive sessions of non-management directors

 

   Annual say-on-pay vote
   Annual boardBoard and committee evaluations

 

   Annual election of all directors
   Robust stock ownership requirements for directors

 

   Majority voting standard in uncontested director elections
   Anti-hedging   Regularly analyze Board and pledging policycommittee composition and succession

 

   No poison pill or similar plan   Right to act by written consent
   Robust risk   Risk oversight process with Board andseparate committee roles

 

   Market-standard proxy access right
   Overboarding policy

 

   Insiders are not permitted to short sell, hedge, or pledge Company securities

 

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    1210


Back to Contents

About Spirit’s Executive Compensation Program and Practices

Overview of Spirit’s Executive Compensation Program

 

We provide highlightsHighlights of our executive compensation program are below. For a full understanding of the compensation paidwe pay to our named executive officers, please review our Compensation“Compensation Discussion and AnalysisAnalysis” and the related compensation tables in this Proxy Statement.

Our compensation objectives are to (i) attract, retain, and motivate highly qualified executive officers, (ii) pay for performancepay-for-performance using short-term and long-term incentives, (iii) align interests of the Company’s executive officers with the Company’s stockholders by using compensation performance measures that are meaningful to our stockholders, and (iv) ensure compensation does not encourage inappropriate risk-taking by diversifying performance measures, using payment caps, and maintaining a clawback policy,policies, among other things. The 20182019 compensation structure (excluding perquisite orand “other” compensation)compensation, and excluding Mr. Kapoor) for our CEO and the other named executive officers (“NEOs”) is below. As the charts below demonstrate, 87%88% of our CEO’s direct compensation was variable based on performance goals, while 77%79% of the other NEOs’ direct compensation was variable based on performance.

 

2019 Pay-for-Performance Metrics

 

 

Incentive Program

Financial Metrics

Weighting

ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVE

Company Portion of
Annual Cash Incentive
(75-80%)

Adjusted Free Cash Flow*

50%

Adjusted EBIT*

30%

Revenue

20%

Individual Portion of Annual Cash Incentive

(20-25%)

None; based on individual performance goals

100%

LONG-TERM INCENTIVES

Time-Based Restricted Stock

Stock Price

60%

Performance-Based Restricted Stock

Free Cash Flow as a Percentage of Revenue*

20%

Total Stockholder Return

20%

*

Please see AppendixA for an explanation and reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    11


Back to Contents

Compensation Practices Checklist

 

Best Practices

What the Company Doesn’t Do

   Align pay and performance - substantial portion of pay is delivered through variable, at-risk compensation   No ongoing new defined-benefit Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan accruals
   Clawback policy   Payout of annual cash incentive and performance-based restricted stock awards is capped at 200%   No share recycling (other than in the context of forfeited shares)short selling, pledging, or hedging stock
   Robust stock ownership requirements   No tax gross-ups related to a change-in-control
   Performance goals are relevant, challenging, and tied to creationkey measures of stockholder valueprofitability and performance   No enhanced health and welfare benefit plans for executives
   Double-trigger change-in-control provisions   Long-term incentives paid entirely in stock   No guaranteed payoutsaccumulation of dividends on unvested performance-based compensation (except for upon death, disability, or retirement after the age of 62, beginning with equityrestricted stock awards granted in 2018)
   Offer market-competitive benefits   Clawback policies   No dividend payments on time-based restricted stock awards until they vest
   Pay long-term incentives entirely   Robust stock ownership requirements   No tax gross-ups related to a change-in-control
   Double-trigger change-in-control provisions   No guaranteed payouts on performance-based compensation (except for upon death, disability, or qualifying retirement)
   Stockholders cast an annual advisory say-on-pay vote   No share recycling (other than in stock   No accumulationthe context of dividends on unvested performance-based restricted stock awardsforfeited shares)

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    1312


Back to Contents

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Overview

The Board of Directors is elected each year at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. Spirit currently has nine10 directors. Each director elected at the Annual Meeting will serve until the 20202021 annual meeting of stockholders and until the election and qualification of his or her respective successor, subject to suchthe director’s earlier death or disability.

Based on the recommendations of the Company’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (the “Governance Committee”), the Board has nominated each of the persons listed below for election as directors. AllExcept for Dr. Cambone, who joined the Board on October 22, 2019, all nominees have served as directors of the Company since the 20182019 annual meeting of stockholders.

Each of the nominees has agreed to serve if elected and, as of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Company has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unavailable to serve. If any nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders’ intention is to vote the proxies for such other person as may be designated by the present Board to fill such vacancy.

The following information with respect to the nine10 nominees is based on information furnished to the Company by each nominee and highlights the specific experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills of the individual nominees that have led the Board to conclude that each should continue to serve on the Board.

Director Nominees

Stephen A. Cambone

Age 67

Director Since 2019

Independent Director

Recent Professional Experience:

Current Public Company Directorships:

Associate Vice Chancellor for Cyber Initiatives, Texas A&M University System (2017-present)

Trustee, Rumsfeld Foundation (2012-present)

Founder, Adirondack Advisors, LLC (2012-2018)

Senior positions at QinetiQ, Inc. (2007-2012), including Executive Vice President, Strategic Development, and President, Missions Solution Group

Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence, U.S. Department of Defense (2003-2006) (served in other roles with the U.S. Department of Defense from 2001-2003)

Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (2019-present)

Committee Assignments:

Audit

Risk

Qualifications,Experience,KeyAttributes,andSkills: Dr. Cambone brings to the Board extensive governmental affairs, defense, and intelligence expertise, along with executive leadership experience in the defense technology industry. Dr. Cambone yields world-class knowledge of cybersecurity matters and invaluable insight into strategic development given his years of experience in the private sector and government.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    13


Back to Contents

Charles L. Chadwell

Age 7879

Director Since 2008

Independent Director

Pre-Retirement Professional Experience:

FormerCurrent Public Company Directorships Held in the Past 7 Years:Directorships:

Vice President and General Manager of Commercial Engine Operations, General Electric Aircraft Engines (“GE Aviation”)(1994-2002)

Vice President, Operations, GE Aviation (1990-1994)

Vice President, Human Resources, GE Aviation (1988-1990)

Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (2008-present)

Former Public Company Directorships Held in the Past Eight Years:

B/E Aerospace (2007-2012)

Committee Assignments:

Governance (Chair)


Compensation

 

Qualifications, Experience, Key Attributes, and Skills: Mr. Chadwell brings to the Board critical supply chain and manufacturing operations expertise, and executive leadership expertise,experience, within the commercial and defense aviation industry. Mr. Chadwell provides the Board with compensation, governance, and human resources expertise, and valuable insight and perspective into aviation industry trends, developments, and challenges. Mr. Chadwell also brings to the Board experience as a public company director.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    14


Back to Contents

Irene M. Esteves

Age 6061

Director Since 2015

Independent Director

Pre-Retirement Professional Experience:

Current Public Company Directorships:

Chief Financial Officer, Time Warner Cable Inc. (2011-2013)

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
XL Group plc (2010-2011)

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Regions Financial Corporation (2008-2010)

Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (2015-present)

RR Donnelley & Sons Co. (2017-present),

Aramark (2014-present), Holdings Corp. (2015-present)

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (2018-present)

Former Public Company Directorships Held in Past 5Six Years:

Level 3 Communications (2014-2017),

TW Telecom Inc. (2014)

Committee Assignments:

Audit (Chair)


Risk

 

Qualifications, Experience, Key Attributes, and Skills: Ms. Esteves has experience in global finance, corporate strategy, human resources, treasury, accounting, tax, risk management, mergers and acquisitions, and investor relations across multiple industries. Ms. Esteves also brings to the Board experience as a public company director. In addition, Ms. Esteves qualifies as an audit committee financial expert under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).SEC rules.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    14


Back to Contents

Paul E. Fulchino

Age 7273

Director Since 2006

Independent Director

Recent Professional Experience:

Current Public Company Directorships:

Operating Partner, AE Industrial Partners (“AEI”) (2015-present)


Senior Advisor, The Boeing Company (“Boeing”) (2010-2014)


Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Aviall, Inc. (2000-2010) (Aviall became a wholly owned subsidiary of Boeing in September 2006.)2006)


President and Chief Operating Officer, B/E Aerospace, Inc. (1996-1999)


President and Vice Chairman, Mercer Management Consulting (1990-1996)

Wesco AircraftSpirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (2008-present)(2006-present)

Committee Assignments:Former Public Company Directorships Held in Past Five Years:

Wesco Aircraft Holdings, Inc. (2008-2020; Wesco filed a securities termination registration notice in January 2020)

Committee Assignments:

Compensation (Chair)


Governance







 

Qualifications, Experience, Key Attributes, and Skills: Mr. Fulchino provides the Board with executive leadership experience, and extensive knowledge and expertise regarding the commercial aviation industry, the Company’s customers and supply base, compensation and human resource matters, and mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Fulchino also brings to the Board experience as a public company director.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    15


Back to Contents

Thomas C. Gentile III

Age 5455

Director Since 2016

Recent Professional Experience:

FormerCurrent Public Company Directorships Held in Past 5 Years:Directorships:

President and Chief Executive Officer, Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (2016-present)

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer, Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc.
(April (April 2016-August 2016)

President and Chief Operating Officer, General Electric Capital Corporation (2014-2016)

President and Chief Executive Officer, General Electric Healthcare Systems (2011-2014)

President and Chief Executive Officer, General Electric Aviation Services (2008-2011)

Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (2016-present)

Former Public Company Directorships Held in Past Five Years:

Synchrony Financial Bank (2015)

 

Qualifications, Experience, Key Attributes, and Skills: Mr. Gentile has demonstrated success in managing large, complex global technology businesses across multiple industries. He brings to the Board a deep understanding of aviation program management, product development, strategy, and business development. Mr. Gentile also brings to the Board experience as a public company director.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    15


Back to Contents

Richard A. Gephardt

Age 7879

Director Since 2006

Recent Professional Experience:

Current Public Company Directorships:

President and Chief Executive Officer, Gephardt Consulting Group (“GCG”) (2007-present)

President and Chief Executive Officer, Gephardt Governmental Affairs (“GGA” and, together with GCG, the “Gephardt Group”) (2005-present)

Member, U.S. House of Representatives
(1977-2005). During this time, he served as the House Minority Leader (1995-2003) and House Majority Leader (1989-1995)

Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (2006-present)

Centene CorporationCorp. (2006-present)

Former Public Company Directorships Held in Past 5Five Years:

Century Link, Inc. (2007-2016),

Ford Motor Company (2009-2015),

U.S. Steel Corporation (2005-2015)

 

Qualifications, Experience, Key Attributes, and Skills: Mr. Gephardt brings governmental affairs and public relations expertiseexperience to the Board, along with labor management and union expertise. He provides the Board with a diverse perspective on public policy, political affairs, and the regulatory environment. Mr. Gephardt also brings to the Board experience as a public company director.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    16


Back to Contents

Robert D. Johnson, Chairman

Age 7172

Director Since 2006

Independent Director

Pre-Retirement Professional Experience:

Current Public Company Directorships:

Chief Executive Officer, Dubai Aerospace
Enterprise Ltd. (2006-2008)

Chairman, Honeywell Aerospace
(2005-2006)

President and Chief Executive Officer, Honeywell Aerospace (2000-2005)(known as Allied Signal Aerospace until 2000) (1999-2005)

President and Chief Executive Officer, Electronic and Avionics Systems, Honeywell Aerospace (known as Allied Signal Aerospace at the time) (1997-1999)

Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (2006-present)

Roper Technologies, Inc. (2005-present),

Spirit Airlines, Inc. (2010-present)

Former Public Company Directorships Held in Past 7Eight Years:

Ariba, Inc. (2003-2012)

Committee Assignments:

Compensation


Governance

 

Qualifications, Experience, Key Attributes, and Skills: Mr. Johnson, Chairman of the Board, has aviation industry executive leadership experience experience inand executive compensation and human resource matters,experience, and provides the Board with valuable insight and perspective resulting from his expertise in marketing, sales, supply chain, and production operations. Mr. Johnson also brings to the Board experience as a public company director.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    16


Back to Contents

Ronald T. Kadish

Age 7071

Director Since 2006

Independent Director

Recent Professional Experience:

FormerCurrent Public Company Directorships Held in Past 5 Years:Directorships:

Consultant, Raytheon (2018-Present)(2018-2019)


Senior Executive Advisor, Booz Allen Hamilton (“Booz”BAH”) (2015-2018)(2015-2019)


Executive Vice President, BoozBAH (2005-2015)


Director, U.S. Missile Defense Agency (2002-2004)


Director, Ballistic Missile Defense Organization, U.S. Department of Defense (1999-2001)

Commander, Electronic Systems Center, Hanscom Air Force Base (1996-1999)

Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (2006-present)

Former Public Company Directorships Held in Past Five Years:

Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc. (formerly known as Orbital ATK, (2015-2018), Inc.) (2015-2019)

Orbital Sciences Corp. (2005-2015)

Committee Assignments:

Risk (Chair)


Governance

 

Qualifications, Experience, Key Attributes, and Skills: Mr. Kadish provides the Board with unique expertise in military, program management, security, international, and governmental matters, including having served three decades in the U.S. Air Force, rising to the rank of Lieutenant General. He delivers critical insight to the Board with respect to enterprise risk management, cybersecurity, global security, and our defense customers’ needs and expectations. Mr. Kadish also brings to the Board experience as a public company director.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    17


Back to Contents

John L. Plueger

Age 6465

Director Since 2014

Independent Director

Recent Professional Experience:

Current Public Company Directorships:

Chief Executive Officer and President,
Air Lease Corporation (“ALC”) (2016-present)


President and Chief Operating Officer, ALC (2010-2016)


President and Chief Executive Officer, International Lease
Finance Corporation (“ILFC”) (2010)


President and Chief Operating Officer, ILFC (2002-2010)

Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (2014-present)

ALC (2010-present)

Committee Assignments:

Audit


Risk

 

Qualifications, Experience, Key Attributes, and Skills: Mr. Plueger provides the Board with valuable insight into the aviation industry and aviation operations management stemming from his executive leadership roles at ILFC and ALC. In addition, Mr. Plueger has significant experience in finance and accounting matters as a certified public accountant, having received his training as an auditor from PricewaterhouseCoopers. Mr. Plueger qualifies as an audit committee financial expert under the rules of the SEC.SEC rules. Mr. Plueger also brings to the Board experience as a public company director.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    17


Back to Contents

Laura H. Wright

Age 5960

Director Since 2018

Independent Director

Recent Professional Experience:

Current Public Company Directorships:

Sole Member and Founder, GSB Advisory, LLC (2013-present)

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Southwest Airlines Co. (“SWA”) (2004-2012)

Vice President, Finance, and Treasurer, SWA (2001-2004)

Treasurer, SWA (1998-2001)

Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (2018-present)

TE Connectivity Ltd. (2014-present),

CMS Energy Corp. (and its wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary, Consumers Energy Company) (2013-present)

Former Public Company Directorships Held in Past 5Five Years:

Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (2009-2019)

Committee Assignments:

Audit


Risk

 

Qualifications, Experience, Key Attributes, and Skills: Ms. Wright has experience in corporate finance and accounting, experience, commercial aviation operations, experience, risk management, experience, and mergers and acquisitions experience, as a result of her position as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of SWA, and various other financial positions held during her 25-year career at SWA. Ms. Wright worked for Arthur Young & Co. in Dallas from 1982-1988 prior to joining SWA. Ms. Wright is a certified public accountant and qualifies as an audit committee financial expert under theSEC rules, of the SEC. Ms. Wrightand also brings to the Board experience as a public company director.

Voting Standard

The Company’s bylaws provide for simple majority voting in an uncontested election of directors. In order for a director nominee to be elected, the votes that stockholders cast “FOR” the director nominee must exceed the votes that stockholders cast “AGAINST” the director nominee. In the event that an incumbent nominee does not receive the requisite majority of votes cast in this election, the Company will follow the procedure described under “General Information Regarding the Meeting — What Happens if an Incumbent Director Nominee is Not Elected at the Annual Meeting?” Any shares not voted (whether by abstention, broker non-vote, or otherwise) will have no impact on the election of directors. Your broker may not vote your shares on this proposal unless you give voting instructions.

   The Board recommends that you vote FOR each of the director nominees.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    18


Back to Contents

BOARD AND GOVERNANCE MATTERS

The Board’s Role

The Company is governed by its Board of Directors. Other than with respect to matters reserved to stockholders, the Board is the ultimate decision-making body of the Company. The Board is responsible for overseeing the Company’s strategy and performance, and protecting stockholder interests and value. Further, the Board is responsible for selecting and overseeing the Company’s executive officers, who set and execute the Company’s business strategy and handle the Company’s day-to-day operations.

In carrying out its responsibilities, the Board has created and delegated certain responsibilities to four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Governance Committee, and the Risk Committee. Additional information about these committees and their responsibilities is described under “Committees.”

Corporate Governance Guidelines

 

The Board is committed to maintaining corporate governance practices that maximize stockholder value. To further its commitment, the Board has adopted the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Governance Guidelines”) to ensure that the Board has the necessary authority and practices in place to effectively review and evaluate the Company’s strategy and operations, to make decisions that are independent of the Company’s management, to oversee management, and to monitor adherence to the Company’s standards and policies. The Governance Guidelines speak to a number of different matters including Board responsibilities, management succession, director conflicts of interest, director compensation, and director attendance at meetings, among other things. The Governance Guidelines are available at http://investor.spiritaero.com/govdocs.

Board Size

 

Pursuant to our bylaws, the Board of Directors is required to consist of three or more directors and may be increased or decreased at any time by the Board of Directors. Currently, the Board of Directors consists of nine10 directors. Pursuant to its charter, the Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing the size of the Board and recommending to the Board any changes it deems appropriate with respect to Board size.

Board Leadership

The Company separateshas separated the roles of Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chairman of the Board in recognition of the differences between the two roles and the value of independent leadership oversight. The Board believes that separation of the roles is appropriate for the Company as it maximizes the ability of the CEO to focus on Company strategy and operations without distraction, while benefiting from the Chairman’s perspective and insight. Because Mr. Johnson, the Chairman of the Board, is an independent director, the Board has not deemed it necessary to appoint a lead independent director.

While the CEO is responsible for setting the strategic direction of the Companyimplementing strategy and managing the day-to-day operations and performance of the Company, the Chairman of the Board performs the following duties:

Sets the agenda for Board meetings;


Presides over meetings of the full Board and executive sessions of independent directors;


Presides over stockholder meetings;


Serves as a liaison between the CEO and the independent directors;


Provides feedback to the CEO on behalf of the independent directors regarding business issues and Board management; and


Regularly speaksEngages with the CEO between Board meetingsweekly to discuss Company performance and matters of significance.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    19


Back to Contents

Board Composition

Selecting qualified individuals to serve as directors is key to the Board’s performance. The Governance Committee is responsible for evaluating qualified potential candidates to serve on the Board, and recommending to the Board for its selection nominees to stand for election as directors at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. This responsibility is further described in the Governance Committee’s charter, which is available at: http://investor.spiritaero.com/govdocs. In evaluating candidates, the Governance Committee and Board consider the qualifications and expertise of director candidates individually and in the broader context of the Board’s overall composition, taking into account any particular needs that the Company may have based on its strategic initiatives, risks, and opportunities. The Company has engaged a third-party international executive search firm to assist the Governance Committee in identifying and evaluating potential director candidates.

In evaluating individual candidates, the Governance Committee considers the personal ethics and values, experience, judgment, and diversity of the candidates, among other things. It is the policy of the Board that the Board reflect diversity of viewpoint, professional experience, education, skill, expertise, industry knowledge, and such other factors as the Governance Committee and Board believe would enhance the effectiveness of the Board. Nominees must have high standards of integrity and ethics, and convey a commitment to act in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.

In addition, the Governance Committee considers the candidates’ employment and other commitments, and evaluates whether the candidates have sufficient time available to efficiently and effectively carry out the duties of directors. For example, the Governance Guidelines limit the number of boards that any director may serve on to five (including the Company’s Board), or three boards (including the Company’s Board) in the case of a director who is an active chief executive officer at another public company.additional information, see section “Overboarding Policy.”

Director Selection Process

 

 

Stockholder Candidates

 

It is the Governance Committee’s policy to consider candidates nominated by stockholders in compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and the procedures described in the Company’s bylaws and Proxy Statement. If a stockholder desires to recommend a director candidate for nomination by the Governance Committee, the stockholder should follow the procedures described under “Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for the 20202021 Annual Meeting.” Director candidates recommended by stockholders will be considered and evaluated in the same manner as candidates discovered through other sources.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    20


Back to Contents

Director Tenure and Refreshment

While the Company has added fourfive new directors to its Board in the past fivesix years, five of the nominees have served on the Board for more than ten10 years. Through its annual evaluation process, the Board has determined that each of these five nominees provides diversity of experience and perspective, and plays an integral and necessary role in the boardroom. The Board has periodically evaluated age and term limits along with retirement policies, and has determined that such limits and policies may arbitrarily restrict valuable Board members from service and, thus, reduce stockholder value.service. Instead, the Board has determined to continue evaluating its members on their merits based on the contributions they make in the boardroom and their ability to enhance overall Board effectiveness. The Board is committed to routine Board and director refreshment as needed to enhance Board effectiveness, and primarily uses rigorous boardBoard and committee evaluations and composition discussions as its refreshment mechanisms.

Board and Committee Evaluations

 

Each year, the Governance Committee oversees an evaluation of the Board and each committee. The 20182019 evaluation covered the following topics, among other things:

Composition of the Board and committees and whether the composition is appropriate in light of the Company’s strategic priorities;

Effectiveness of Board and committee leadership;

Strengths of the Board and committees and opportunities for improvement;

Quality of information provided to the Board;

Effectiveness of structures and practices;

Quality of the directors’ relationships with each other; and

Quality of the Board’s relationship with management.

A summary of the evaluation process is below:

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    21


Back to Contents

Director Education

Our director education program is multifaceted and includes occasional site visits and tours, in-depth education seminars on topics of interest by senior management and external advisors, background material on the Company’s operations and strategy, and the regular provision of resources from various educational institutions to directors. Each new Board member receives onboarding programming that involves meetings with senior management, business overviews, and presentations on the Code of Business Conduct, insider trading, and various other policies and procedures. We encourage our directors to attend reputable director education programs sponsored by external advisors and educational institutions.

Director Independence

The Company’s Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), and the Company uses the NYSE’s listing standards to determine director independence. Under the NYSE’s listing standards and the Governance Guidelines, the Board must consist of a majority of independent directors, and the Audit, Governance, and Compensation Committees must consist solely of independent directors. For a director to qualify as independent, the Board must determine that the director has no material relationship with the Company (either directly, or as a partner, stockholder, or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company). The Board performs an independence assessment of each director annually, with the assistance of the Governance Committee, and as circumstances may otherwise require.

In assessing the existence of a material relationship with the Company, the Board considers all relevant transactions, relationships, and arrangements required by the NYSE’s independence standards.standards, as applicable to non-employee directors generally and as applicable to each committee. The Board examined each director’s involvement through directorships, employment, consulting relationships, or otherwise, with entities the Company does business with. In particular, the Board evaluated the following:

 

Topic

Transaction Evaluated

Outcome

Paul E. Fulchino

When considering the independence of Mr. Fulchino, the Board considered his role as an operating partner of AE Industrial Partners (“AEI”),AEI, a private equity firm that has ownership interests in fourseveral of the Company’s suppliers. For three of such suppliers, all work with the Company was won as a result of the suppliers submitting the most competitive proposal in competitive bidding situations. With respect to the fourth supplier, AEI is a minority owner and the percentage of the supplier’s revenue that is attributable to the Company is insignificant.

In his role at AEI, Mr. Fulchino assists with the acquisition, development, and value creation of portfolio companies. Mr. Fulchino receives a retainer from AEI and does not own any equity in AEI. However, Mr. Fulchino receives a modest carrying interest upon the sale of certain portfolio companies. Mr. Fulchino has no agreements with AEI, is not covered under AEI’s benefit plans or programs, receives a Form 1099 from AEI, and is free to be employed by other companies.

The Board affirmatively determined, based on available facts and circumstances, that Mr. Fulchino was not an employee of AEI (for purposes of the independence determination). Further, with respect to the Company’s transactions with threeall but one of the AEI-owned suppliers, each transaction arose as a result of the respective entity submitting the most competitive bid out of all bidding suppliers, and, thus, the transactions were not reportable under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. Finally, with respect to the fourthfinal supplier, the Board determined that Mr. Fulchino’s relationship with AEI did not give rise to a material interest. For these and other reasons, the Board determined that Mr. Fulchino’s relationship with AEI does not give rise to a material relationship that impacts his independence or creates a related person transaction.

Richard A. Gephardt

When considering Mr. Gephardt’s independence, the Board considered his role as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Gephardt Consulting Group, a consulting firm that provides services to the Company in connection with labor matters (the “Gephardt Group”).matters. Mr. Gephardt holds a 40% equity interest in the Gephardt Group, and Mr. Gephardt’s son, Chief Operating Officer of the Gephardt Group, holds a 10% equity interest. The Company’s transactions with the Gephardt Group in 20182019 amounted to $275,604.$297,513.

The Board affirmatively determined that, in light of Mr. Gephardt’s significant ownership and involvement in the Gephardt Group, Mr. Gephardt has a material relationship with the Company and is, therefore, not independent.

 

Based on this analysis, the Board has determined that all the director nominees are independent under the NYSE’s criteria, with the exclusion of Messrs. Gentile and Gephardt. All the committees of the Board are comprised solely of independent directors.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    22


Back to Contents

Committees

The Board has four committees: the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Governance Committee, and Risk Committee. The Board has adopted written charters for each committee, which are available at http://investor.spiritaero.com/govdocs. Information on each committee is set forth in the table below.

Committee

Members

Primary Responsibilities

No. of

Meetings

in

2018 2019

Audit Committee*

Irene M. Esteves (Chair)

Stephen A. Cambone**

John L. Plueger

Laura H. Wright

(1)

Oversee the quality and integrity of the Company’s financial reporting.

(2)

Oversee the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

(3)

Engage, compensate, and oversee performance of the independent auditor’s performance.auditor.

(4)

Oversee performance of the Company’s internal audit function.

(5)

Review and discuss with management and the independent auditors the Company’s earnings releases and quarterly and annual reports on Forms 10-Q and 10-K.10-K, and the audit generally.

(6)

Consider the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.reporting and participate in the resolution of internal control issues, where identified.

(7)

Collaborate with the Risk Committee and overseeOversee financial-related risk exposures, and related policies and processes attempting to mitigate such risks.

(8)

Oversee the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and the Company’s ethics and compliance program.

98

Compensation Committee

Paul E. Fulchino (Chair)

Robert D. Johnson

Charles L. Chadwell

(1)

Review and approve the compensation of the Company’s executive officers.

(2)

Oversee the administration of the Company’s compensation plans, policies, and programs.

(3)

Prepare the Compensation Committee Report in this Proxy Statement.

(4)

Collaborate with the Risk Committee and overseeOversee compensation-related risk exposures, and related policies and processes attempting to mitigate such risks.

(5)

Review and make recommendations to the Board with respect to non-employee director compensation.

5

Governance Committee

Charles L. Chadwell (Chair)

Robert D. Johnson

Paul E. Fulchino

Ronald T. Kadish

(1)

Assist the Board in identifying qualified individuals to become Board members.

(2)

Determine the composition of the Board and its committees.

(3)

Lead the Board in its annual review of the Board’s performance.

(4)

Develop and implement the Governance Guidelines and recommend to the Board any changes thereto.

(5)

Review and approve, deny, or ratify transactions under the Company’s Related Person Transaction Policy.

(6)

Collaborate with the Risk Committee and overseeOversee risks related to the Company’s governance structure.

54

Risk Committee

Ronald T. Kadish (Chair)

Stephen A. Cambone**

John L. Plueger

Irene M. Esteves

Laura H. Wright

(1)

Provide oversight of management’s guidelines, policies, and processes for assessing, monitoring, and mitigating the Company’s critical enterprise risks, including the major strategic, operational,operating, financial, and compliance risks inherent in the Company’s business and core strategies, and collaborate with other committees regarding the same.strategies.

(2)

Oversee the effectiveness of the Company’s cybersecurity programs and its practices for identifying, assessing, and mitigating cybersecurity risks.

(3)

Oversee management’s review and assessment of key risks that have the potential to significantly affect the Company’s ability to execute its strategy, and determine which risks should be included on the Board’s agenda for discussion.

4

*

The Board has determined that Ms.Mses. Esteves and Wright and Mr. Plueger and Ms. Wright are “audit committee financial experts,” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K.

**

Dr. Cambone was appointed to these committees on October 22, 2019.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    23


Back to Contents

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Management’s Role in Risk Management

 

The Company’s management is responsible for the identification, assessment, mitigation, and management of risks relating to the Company’s strategy and operations. Apart from reporting to the Board, management engages in a robust enterprise risk management process that involves: (i) semi-annual risk-assessment surveys and interviews; (ii) reviewing, repositioning, and prioritizing identified risks by a risk council composed of executive leadership (the “Risk Council”); (iii) assigning risks to risk owners based on responsibilities with respect to the Company’s strategic objectives; (iv) developing and reporting mitigation plans by the risk owners and risk management team to the Risk Council; and (v) oversight by the Company’s internal audit function. On a quarterly basis, the status of the top risks identified in management’s enterprise risk management process, along with their associated mitigation plans, areis presented to the Risk Committee. Recent risks that the Company have focused on include the B737 MAX situation and the coronavirus, or COVID-19.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    24


Back to Contents

Cybersecurity

 

The Risk Committee of the Board is charged with oversight ofreviewing the Company’s cybersecurity matters. Thematters, and the Company hired a Chief Information Security Officer (“CISO”) in early 2018 to oversee the Company’s cybersecurity practices and procedures. The CISO reports to the Risk Committee quarterly regarding suchcyber practices and procedures. The Company took several steps in 2018 to mitigate cybersecurity risks, such as upgrading operating and monitoring systems, hiring specialized personnel, and reviewing and improving applicable policies and procedures. The Company requires cybersecurity education at all levels of the organization.

Communications with the Board

Stockholders and other interested persons may communicate with the Board, the Chairman of the Board and individual members of the Board members of any committee of the Board, or one or more non-employee directorsand its committees through the following:

BY EMAIL

to CorporateSecretary@spiritaero.com

BY MAIL

to Corporate Secretary

Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc.

3801 S. Oliver St.

Wichita, KS 67210-2112

IN PERSON

at the Annual Meeting

(we expect all of our directors to attend)

 

The Corporate Secretary will forward communications received to the appropriate party. Receipt of communications clearly not appropriate for consideration by members of the Board, such as unsolicited advertisements, inquiries concerning the Company’s products and services, and harassing communications, are not forwarded to members of the Board.

Commitment to Stockholder Engagement and Responsiveness

Engagement

We value the feedback and insight we gain from our engagement with stockholders. The Company’s management and subject-matter experts frequently meet with investors to discuss Company performance, governance practices, strategy, operations, and other matters of importance to our stockholders. In 2018,2019, members of the Company’s management held more than 560850 in-person and telephonic meetings with investors and analysts, and traveled throughthroughout the continental U.S. and to the U.K.internationally to attend the meetings. The Company is committed to maintaining a robust stockholder outreach program in addition to regular participation at investor and community events and meeting with analysts. The Company welcomes feedback from all stockholders. Stockholders can contact the Company’s Investor Relations team by calling 316-523-7040 or emailing investorrelations@spiritaero.com.

Responsiveness

At the 2018 annual meeting, two proposals were put forth regarding the stockholders’ right to call special meetings. Proposal 4 was a proposal from the Company’s Board to reduce the threshold required to call a special meeting from a majority of stockholders to 25%. Proposal 5 was a stockholder proposal to reduce the threshold required to call a special meeting from a majority of stockholders to 10%. At the 2018 annual meeting, stockholders voted overwhelmingly in favor of Proposal 5. After the 2018 annual meeting, the Company’s management engaged with several stockholders on the matter and reported the conclusions from the engagement efforts to the Board. On July 23, 2018, after careful consideration of the matter, the Board amended the Company’s bylaws to lower the threshold required to call a special meeting from a majority of stockholders to 10%, consistent with Proposal 5. The Board also adopted a number of customary protections around the right to protect against misuse. The bylaws, as amended, are available on the Company’s website at http://investor.spiritaero.com/govdocs.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    25


Back to Contents

2018 Board and Committee Meetings and Attendance

During 2018,2019, there were four in-person meetings and seveneight telephonic meetings of the Board. All the Company’s directors attended 75% or more of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and of committees on which they served in 2018.2019 (with Dr. Cambone’s attendance being measured from his date of election, October 22, 2019). The Company’s Governance Guidelines provide that director attendance is expected at annual meetings of stockholders, andstockholders. With respect to the 2019 annual meeting, all of the Company’sthen-current directors attended the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders.except for Messrs. Fulchino and Gephardt, who were unable to attend due to personal reasons.

In addition to scheduled Board meetings, the Board receives monthly reports from Mr. Gentile detailing financial results, operationaloperating highlights and challenges, and updates on strategic initiatives.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    25


Back to Contents

Executive Sessions

As part of each quarterly in-person Board meeting in 2018,2019, the Company’s non-employee directors met without management present in an executive session. During executive sessions, the non-employee directors reviewed management’s performance, compensation, talent development and succession planning, strategic considerations, corporate governance matters, and other matters of importance.

Overboarding Policy

Per our Governance Guidelines, directors are expected to ensure that other commitments, including outside board memberships, do not interfere with their duties and responsibilities as members of the Board. A director may not serve on the boards of more than four other public companies or, if the director is an active CEO or equivalent of another public company, on the boards of more than two other public companies. In addition, directors must notify the Governance Committee before accepting an invitation to serve on the board of any other public company or other for-profit entity. The director must not accept such service until being advised by the Governance Committee chair that such committee has determined that service on such other board would not create regulatory issues or potential conflicts of interest and would not conflict with the Company’s policies. All directors are in compliance with the Company’s overboarding policy as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

Code of Business Conduct

The Company is committed to the highest ethical standards and to complying with all laws and regulations applicable to the Company’s business. To support and articulate its commitment and personal responsibility in this regard, the Company has adopted the Code of Business Conduct (the “Code”). The Code addresses a number of topics, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, conflicts of interest, safeguarding assets, insider trading, and general adherence to laws and regulations. All directors and employees, including executive officers, must comply with the Code. The Code is available on the Company’s website at http://investor.spiritaero.com/govdocs.

Policy Prohibiting Short Selling, Hedging, and Pledging

The Company has adopted a policy prohibiting the Company’s insiders from engaging in short selling, hedging, and pledging the Company’s securities. As it relates to hedging, insiders of the Company are prohibited from purchasing or selling, or making any offer to purchase or offer to sell, derivative securities related to the Company’s securities, such as exchange traded options to purchase or sell the Company’s securities or financial instruments that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of the Company’s securities (including but not limited to prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds). Company insiders include all employees and directors of the Company as well as their spouses, domestic partners, minor children, economic dependents, other persons living in their households, or any corporations, partnerships, trusts, or other entities that they beneficially own, and any person over whom, or trust or other entity over which, they have control.

Succession Planning

The Board is responsible for overseeing management succession planning. At least twice annually, the Board reviews candidates for succession with respect to the CEO role and other senior management roles. Succession plans have been developed for both ordinary course succession and contingency planning due to an unforeseen event.

The Board receives updates on the development of the succession candidates regularly. Directors engage with potential succession candidates during formal presentations at Board and committee meetings, and informal events with directors and candidates present.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    26


Back to Contents

Compensation of Non-Employee Directors

Overview

 

Non-employee directors receive annual cash and equity compensation as described below. Equity compensation is granted under the Director Stock Program adopted under the 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended (the “OIP”). The Compensation Committee reviews and approves non-employee director compensation amounts and practices annually. As part of their review, the Compensation Committee evaluates non-employee director compensation data from the companies in Spirit’s proxy peer group, including data regarding the size of equity awards. In addition, the Compensation Committee confers with its independent compensation consultant on the magnitude and type of non-employee director compensation, and reviews market data and benchmarking surveys provided by the consultant. Based upon that information, the Compensation Committee makes a recommendation to the Board. The Board approves the form and amount of compensation after considering the Compensation Committee’s recommendation.

In developing its recommendations, the Compensation Committee is guided by the following goals with respect to non-employee director compensation:

Compensation should be market-competitive in relation to comparably-situated companies, including the Company’s proxy peer group;

Compensation should align directors’ interests with the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders; and

The compensation structure should be simple, transparent, and easy for stockholders to understand.

Compensation Elements

 

The following table describes the elements of the 20182019 non-employee director compensation program:

Element

Amount

Annual Board Cash Retainer

$105,000

Annual Board Equity Retainer

$125,000

Additional Retainer for Chairman of the Board

$100,000

Additional Retainer for Chairman of the Audit Committee

$25,000

Additional Retainer for Chairman of the Compensation Committee

$18,000

Additional Retainer for Chairmen of Other Committees

$12,000

 

Cash Retainers

Each Board member receives an annual cash retainer, which is paid quarterly. Further, the Chairman of the Board and each committee chairman receives an additional cash retainer. Directors may elect to have their retainers received in shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units (“RSUs”) in lieu of cash.

Equity Retainer

Each Board member receives an annual equity retainer, which may be paid annually in the form of restricted stock or RSUs. Both types of awards vest if the non-employee director remains continuously in service for the entire term to which the grant relates. If the non-employee director incurs a termination for any reason before the end of the term (before the annual meeting of stockholders following the grant), the awards are forfeited without any payment. The Board may, in its discretion, waive this one-year service condition (in whole or in part) if it deems it to be appropriate and in the best interests of the Company to do so. Upon vesting, shares of restricted stock are delivered to the directors; however, vested RSUs are not paid to the director until the date that the director leaves the Board. Restricted stock confers voting and dividend rights; dividends accrue during the restricted period and are paid out upon vesting. RSUs do not confer voting rights, but do confer dividend equivalent rights; dividend equivalents accrue during the restricted period and thereafter, and are paid out upon settlement. If the awards are forfeited, dividends or dividend equivalents, as applicable, are also forfeited.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    27


Back to Contents

Board and Committee Meeting Fees

Until April 25, 2018, Board and committee meeting fees of $1,000 per meeting were paid for attendance at formal meetings where notice was duly given, a quorum was present, a matter was presented for consideration, the Board or committee took action on the matter, and minutes were taken. Meeting fees were paid in cash in arrears at the end of the quarter for which the fees were earned. Directors could choose to receive fees in the form of cash, restricted stock, or RSUs. A director was required to attend a majority of his or her required Board and committee meetings to receive any meeting fees. On April 25, 2018, the Board of Directors terminated the practice of paying meeting fees and changed the annual board equity retainer from $105,000 to $125,000.

Other Compensation

Directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their Board services.service. The Company does not provide perquisite allowances to non-employee directors.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    27


Back to Contents

Non-Employee Director Stock Ownership Requirements

 

Non-employee directors are required to own stock equal to five times the annual Board cash retainer, which currently amounts to $525,000. Non-employee directors have four years of Board service to meet the minimum stockholder requirements. Restricted stock and RSUs held by directors are counted in determining whether the minimum stockholding requirements are satisfied. Information regarding the current stock ownership of the Company’s non-employee directors can be found below under “Stock Ownership — Beneficial Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers.”

As of February 25, 2019,March 9, 2020, all non-employee directors other than Ms. Wright, Dr. Cambone, and Mr. Gephardt were in compliance with the stock ownership requirements. Ms. Wright, who joined our Board on February 20, 2018, has until February 20, 2022 to meet the requirements. Dr. Cambone, who joined the Board on October 22, 2019, has until October 22, 2023 to meet the requirements. Mr. Gephardt’s non-compliance was due to the Company’s recent stock price movement (when the Company’s Common Stock price dropped below $52.68 per share on March 3, 2020, he became non-compliant with the requirements). The Company expects that Mr. Gephardt will become compliant with the requirements after receiving the 2020 annual non-employee director equity grant (subject to his election to the Board at the Annual Meeting).

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    28


Back to Contents

20182019 Director Compensation Table

The following table sets forth non-employee director compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2019 (note that Mr. Gentile’s compensation is set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table” and not included below).

Name

Fees Earned or Paid

in Cash

($)

(1) 

 

Stock

Awards

($)

(2) 

 

All Other

Compensation

($)

(3) 

 

Total

($)

Fees Earned or Paid

in Cash

($)

(1) 

 

Stock

Awards

($)

(2) 

 

All Other

Compensation

($)

(3) 

 

Total

($)

Stephen A. Cambone

 

 

115,321

(4) 

 

 

115,321

Charles L. Chadwell

125,000

 

125,039

 

 

 

250,039

117,000

 

125,035

 

 

 

242,035

Irene M. Esteves

 

 

271,099

(4) 

 

 

271,099

 

 

255,047

(5)

 

 

255,047

Paul E. Fulchino

 

 

262,054

(5) 

 

 

262,054

 

 

248,062

(6) 

 

 

248,062

Richard A. Gephardt

108,000

 

125,039

 

275,604

 

508,643

105,000

 

125,035

 

297,513

 

527,548

Robert D. Johnson

205,000

 

125,039

 

 

 

330,039

205,000

 

125,035

 

16,197 

 

346,232

Ronald T. Kadish

124,000

 

125,039

 

 

 

249,039

117,000

 

125,035

 

 

 

242,035

John L. Plueger

 

 

245,053

(6) 

 

 

245,053

 

 

230,075

(7) 

 

 

230,075

Francis Raborn(7)

61,500

 

 

 

 

 

61,500

Laura H. Wright

72,148

 

168,205

(8) 

 

 

240,353

84,000

 

146,078

(8) 

 

 

230,078

(1)

Includes cash retainer, additional Committee chairmen retainers, and meeting fees paid until April 25, 2018. Please refer to “Compensation of Non-Employee Directors — Compensation Elements — Board and Committee Meeting Fees.”

(2)

Except for Ms. Wright (see footnote (8) below): Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards computed in accordance with authoritative guidance on stock-based compensation accounting issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”). On May 7, 2018, each non-employee director received an annual grant of 1,493 shares of restricted stock or RSUs with an aggregate value of $125,000 based on $83.75 per share, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on the grant date. As a result of rounding up fractional share amounts, the grants were valued at $125,039. In addition, certain directors elected to defer a portion or all of their annual cash retainer. Please see footnotes (4), (5), and (6), for more information. As of February 25, 2019, the balance of each non-employee director’s unvested restricted stock or unvested RSUs was as follows: Mr. Chadwell: 1,493 shares of restricted stock; Ms. Esteves: 3,237 RSUs (includes 1,744 RSUs for deferred retainer, committee chair, and meeting fees); Mr. Fulchino: 3,129 shares of restricted stock (includes 1,636 shares of restricted stock for deferred retainer, committee chair, and meeting fees); Mr. Gephardt: 1,493 shares of restricted stock; Mr. Johnson: 1,493 shares of restricted stock; Mr. Kadish: 1,493 shares of restricted stock; and Mr. Plueger: 2,926 shares of restricted stock (includes 1,493 shares of restricted stock for deferred retainer and meeting fees).

(3)

The amount of perquisites and other personal benefits has been excluded for all non-employee directors other than Mr. Gephardt, as the total value of each director’s perquisites and other personal benefits was less than $10,000. For Mr. Gephardt, this amount reflects consulting fees paid to the Gephardt Group for labor consulting services rendered in 2018, as further described under “Director Independence.”

(4)

Includes $105,000 in deferred cash retainer, $25,000 in deferred Committee chair cash retainer, and $16,000 in deferred meeting fees per Ms. Esteves’ election to receive her cash retainers and meeting fees in RSUs.

(5)

Includes $105,000 in deferred cash retainer, $18,000 in deferred Committee chair cash retainer, and $14,000 in deferred meeting fees per Mr. Fulchino’s election to receive his cash retainers and meeting fees in restricted stock.

(6)

Includes $105,000 in deferred cash retainer and $15,000 in deferred meeting fees per Mr. Plueger’s election to receive his cash retainer and meeting fees in restricted stock.

(7)

Mr. Raborn was a non-employee director of the Company until April 25, 2018, when he retired. Mr. Raborn’s fees were prorated to reflect his service in 2018.

(8)

Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of two stock awards computed in accordance with authoritative guidance on stock-based compensation accounting issued by the FASB: (a) The first stock award was issued on February 20, 2018, the date Ms. Wright joined the Board. On this date, Ms. Wright received a pro rata grant of 243 shares of restricted stock with an aggregate value of $22,094 based on $91.13, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on February 20, 2018. As a result of rounding up fractional share amounts, the grant was valued at $22,145. The amount of Ms. Wright’s stock award included $3,683 in deferred cash retainer. (b) The second stock award was issued on May 7, 2018, when the annual Board equity awards were granted. On this date, Ms. Wright received a grant of 1,493 shares of restricted stock with an aggregate value of $125,000 based on $83.75 per share, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on the grant date. As a result of rounding up fractional share amounts, the grant was valued at $125,039. Ms. Wright also elected to defer $21,000 representing an additional 251 shares of restricted stock per Ms. Wright’s election to receive a portion of her cash retainer in restricted stock. As of February 25, 2019, the balance of Ms. Wright’s unvested restricted stock is 1,744 shares of restricted stock (including 251 shares of restricted stock for deferred cash retainer).

(1)

Includes annual cash retainer and committee chair retainers (unless deferred).

(2)

Includes stock retainer and any annual cash or committee chair retainers that were deferred by election. Except for Dr. Cambone (see footnote (4) below): Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards computed in accordance with authoritative guidance on stock-based compensation accounting issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”). On May 6, 2019, each non-employee director received an annual grant of 1,432 shares of restricted stock or RSUs with an aggregate value of $125,000 based on $87.315 per share, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on the grant date. As a result of rounding up fractional share amounts, the grants were valued at $125,035. In addition, certain directors elected to defer a portion or all of their annual cash retainer and committee chair retainer, as applicable. Please see footnotes (5), (6), (7), and (8) for more information. As of December 31, 2019, the balance of each non-employee director’s unvested restricted stock RSUs was as follows: Mr. Chadwell: 1,432 shares of restricted stock; Ms. Esteves: 2,921 RSUs (includes 1,489 RSUs for deferred annual cash and committee chair retainers); Mr. Fulchino: 2,841 shares of restricted stock (includes 1,409 shares of restricted stock for deferred annual cash and committee chair retainers); Mr. Gephardt: 1,432 shares of restricted stock; Mr. Johnson: 1,432 shares of restricted stock; Mr. Kadish: 1,432 shares of restricted stock; Mr. Plueger: 2,635 shares of restricted stock (includes 1,203 shares of restricted stock for deferred annual cash retainer); and Ms. Wright: 1,673 shares of restricted stock (includes 241 shares of restricted stock for deferred annual cash retainer).

(3)

The amount of perquisites and other personal benefits has been excluded for all non-employee directors other than Messrs. Gephardt and Johnson, as the total value of each director’s perquisites and other personal benefits was less than $10,000. For Mr. Gephardt, this amount reflects consulting fees paid to the Gephardt Group for labor consulting services rendered in 2019, as further described under “Director Independence.” For Mr. Johnson, this amount reflects $3,412 in personal aircraft usage (as calculated in Footnote 9 of the “Summary Compensation Table”), and $12,785 in spousal travel expenses.

(4)

Represents the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with authoritative guidance on stock-based compensation accounting issued by the FASB of the prorata stock award issued to Dr. Cambone on November 5, 2019. On this date, Dr. Cambone received a prorata grant of the annual equity retainer of 737 RSUs with an aggregate value of $62,672 based on $85.045, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on November 5, 2019. As a result of rounding up the fractional share amount, the grant was valued at $62,678. In addition, Dr. Cambone elected to defer all of his prorata annual cash retainer of $52,645. As of December 31, 2019, the balance of Dr. Cambone’s unvested RSUs is 1,356 RSUs (including 619 RSUs for deferred annual cash retainer).

(5)

Includes $105,000 in deferred annual cash retainer, and $25,000 in deferred committee chair retainer per Ms. Esteves’ election to receive all compensation in RSUs.

(6)

Includes $105,000 in deferred annual cash retainer, and $18,000 in deferred committee chair retainer per Mr. Fulchino’s election to receive all compensation in restricted stock.

(7)

Includes $105,000 in deferred annual cash retainer per Mr. Plueger’s election to receive all compensation in restricted stock.

(8)

Includes $21,000 in deferred annual cash retainer per Ms. Wright’s election to receive a portion in restricted stock.

(1)

Includes annual cash retainer and committee chair retainers (unless deferred).

(2)

Includes stock retainer and any annual cash or committee chair retainers that were deferred by election. Except for Dr. Cambone (see footnote (4) below): Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards computed in accordance with authoritative guidance on stock-based compensation accounting issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”). On May 6, 2019, each non-employee director received an annual grant of 1,432 shares of restricted stock or RSUs with an aggregate value of $125,000 based on $87.315 per share, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on the grant date. As a result of rounding up fractional share amounts, the grants were valued at $125,035. In addition, certain directors elected to defer a portion or all of their annual cash retainer and committee chair retainer, as applicable. Please see footnotes (5), (6), (7), and (8) for more information. As of December 31, 2019, the balance of each non-employee director’s unvested restricted stock RSUs was as follows: Mr. Chadwell: 1,432 shares of restricted stock; Ms. Esteves: 2,921 RSUs (includes 1,489 RSUs for deferred annual cash and committee chair retainers); Mr. Fulchino: 2,841 shares of restricted stock (includes 1,409 shares of restricted stock for deferred annual cash and committee chair retainers); Mr. Gephardt: 1,432 shares of restricted stock; Mr. Johnson: 1,432 shares of restricted stock; Mr. Kadish: 1,432 shares of restricted stock; Mr. Plueger: 2,635 shares of restricted stock (includes 1,203 shares of restricted stock for deferred annual cash retainer); and Ms. Wright: 1,673 shares of restricted stock (includes 241 shares of restricted stock for deferred annual cash retainer).

(3)

The amount of perquisites and other personal benefits has been excluded for all non-employee directors other than Messrs. Gephardt and Johnson, as the total value of each director’s perquisites and other personal benefits was less than $10,000. For Mr. Gephardt, this amount reflects consulting fees paid to the Gephardt Group for labor consulting services rendered in 2019, as further described under “Director Independence.” For Mr. Johnson, this amount reflects $3,412 in personal aircraft usage (as calculated in Footnote 9 of the “Summary Compensation Table”), and $12,785 in spousal travel expenses.

(4)

Represents the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with authoritative guidance on stock-based compensation accounting issued by the FASB of the prorata stock award issued to Dr. Cambone on November 5, 2019. On this date, Dr. Cambone received a prorata grant of the annual equity retainer of 737 RSUs with an aggregate value of $62,672 based on $85.045, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on November 5, 2019. As a result of rounding up the fractional share amount, the grant was valued at $62,678. In addition, Dr. Cambone elected to defer all of his prorata annual cash retainer of $52,645. As of December 31, 2019, the balance of Dr. Cambone’s unvested RSUs is 1,356 RSUs (including 619 RSUs for deferred annual cash retainer).

(5)

Includes $105,000 in deferred annual cash retainer, and $25,000 in deferred committee chair retainer per Ms. Esteves’ election to receive all compensation in RSUs.

(6)

Includes $105,000 in deferred annual cash retainer, and $18,000 in deferred committee chair retainer per Mr. Fulchino’s election to receive all compensation in restricted stock.

(7)

Includes $105,000 in deferred annual cash retainer per Mr. Plueger’s election to receive all compensation in restricted stock.

(8)

Includes $21,000 in deferred annual cash retainer per Ms. Wright’s election to receive a portion in restricted stock.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    29


Back to Contents

Related Person Transactions

Related Person Transaction Policy and Process

 

The Board has adopted a written Related Person Transaction Policy (the “RPT Policy”) that can be found on the Company’s website at http://www.investor.spiritaero.com/www.investor.spiritaero.com/govdocs. The purpose of the RPT Policy is to ensure the proper evaluation, approval, or ratification, and reporting of related person transactions. Such transactions are only appropriate if they are fair to, and in the best interests of, the Company.

Under the RPT Policy, a related person transaction is any transaction in which the Company was, is, or will be a participant, where the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which a Related Person has, had, or will have a direct or indirect material interest. A Related Person is a director, director nominee, officer, or 5% stockholder, or any of their immediate family members. The existence of a direct or indirect material interest depends upon individual facts and circumstances and is determined by our General Counsel or the Governance Committee.

The Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing these transactions and determining whether they are fair to, and in the best interests of, the Company. After review of the relevant facts and circumstances, if the Governance Committee concludes the related person transaction is fair to, and in the best interests of, the Company, it may approve or ratify the transaction.

If the Governance Committee declines to approve or ratify any related person transaction, the Company’s General Counsel will review the transaction, determine whether it should be terminated or amended in a manner that is acceptable to the Governance Committee, and advise the Governance Committee of their recommendation. The Governance Committee will then consider the recommendation at its next meeting. If the General Counsel does not ultimately recommend the transaction to the Governance Committee or if the Governance Committee does not approve the transaction, the proposed transaction will not be pursued; or, if the transaction has already been entered into, the Governance Committee will determine an appropriate course of action with respect to the transaction.

Certain Related Person Transactions

 

Below are the transactions that occurred between January 1, 2018,2019, and February 25, 2019,March 9, 2020, and fall within the definition of related person transaction in the RPT Policy or under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. With respect to each transaction, the Governance Committee reviewed the transaction in accordance with the RPT Policy and approved it on the basis that it was fair to, and in the best interests of, the Company.

Related Person

Facts

Richard A. Gephardt

As described under “Board and Governance Matters — Director Independence,” above, the Company entered into an agreement with the Gephardt Group for labor consulting services in 2018 and paid $275,604$297,513 pursuant to this agreement during 2018.2019.

John A. Pilla

John Pilla, Senior Vice President and Chief Technology and Quality Officer, has two sons employed by the Company, Anthony Pilla, Cyber Protection Specialist (employed with the Company since June 3, 2016), and Nicolas Pilla, Systems Engineer (employed with the Company since May 31, 2013). Combined, Mr. Pilla’s sons received $204,171$187,593 in compensation from the Company in 2018 (this number includes a stock award with a grant date fair value of $45,553);2019; such compensation was established in accordance with the Company’s compensation practices applicable to employees with equivalent responsibilities, experience, and qualifications. Mr. Pilla’s sons are also eligible to participate in employee benefit programs in the same manner as other eligible employees.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    30


Back to Contents

STOCK OWNERSHIP

Beneficial Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth, as of February 25, 2019,March 9, 2020, the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by each director and named executive officer, individually, and by all the Company’s directors and executive officers as a group. Individually, and together, they owneach beneficially owns less than 1%1.0% of our Common Stock. Together, they beneficially own 1.04% of our Common Stock (including unvested time-based and performance-based restricted stock). The table also includes information about RSUs credited to the accounts of certain non-employee directors.directors, which are not beneficially owned. For purposes of the table, shares are considered to be beneficially owned if the person, directly or indirectly, has sole or shared voting or investment power with respect to the shares. In addition, a person is deemed to beneficially own shares if that person has the right to acquire such shares within 60 days after February 25, 2019.March 5, 2020.

 

Name

Common Stock

Beneficially

Owned

 

Shares Vesting

in 60 Days of

Record Date

Time-Based and

Performance-

Based Restricted

Stock

(1) 

Total Common

Stock

Beneficially

Owned

RSUs

(2) 

Total Common

Stock Beneficially

Owned Including

RSUs

Common

Stock

Beneficially

Owned

 

Shares Vesting

within 60

Days of

Record Date(1) 

Time-Based and

Performance-

Based Restricted

Stock(2)

 

Total Common

Stock

Beneficially

Owned

RSUs(3)

 

Total Common

Stock Beneficially

Owned And

RSUs

DIRECTORS

Charles L. Chadwell

 

12,328

 

 

 

 

1,493

 

 

13,821

 

4,884

 

 

18,705

DIRECTORS

Stephen A. Cambone

 

 

 

 

 

1,356

 

 

1,356

Charles L. Chadwell

13,821

 

1,432

 

15,253

4,884

 

20,137

Irene M. Esteves

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,465

 

15,465

 

 

18,386

 

18,386

Paul E. Fulchino

9,105

 

 

3,129

 

12,234

 

 

12,234

12,234

 

2,841

 

15,075

 

15,075

Richard A. Gephardt

1,251

 

 

1,493

 

2,744

5,790

 

8,534

2,744

 

1,432

 

4,176

5,790

 

9,966

Robert D. Johnson

12,742

 

 

1,493

 

14,235

 

 

14,235

11,735

 

1,432

 

13,167

 

13,167

Ronald T. Kadish

17,180

 

 

1,493

 

18,673

 

 

18,673

18,673

 

1,432

 

20,105

 

20,105

John L. Plueger

6,358

 

 

2,926

 

9,284

13,026

 

22,310

9,284

 

2,635

 

11,919

13,026

 

24,945

Laura H. Wright

1,443 

 

 

1,744

 

3,187

 

 

3,187

3,187

 

1,673

 

4,860

 

4,860

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Thomas C. Gentile III

 

65,645

 

 

 

 

182,921

 

 

248,566

 

 

 

 

248,566

 

125,760

 

 

 

 

181,737

 

 

307,497

 

 

 

 

307,497

Sanjay Kapoor(3)

87,488

 

 

36,240

 

123,728

 

 

123,728

Mark J. Suchinski(4)

21,181

 

15,942

 

37,123

 

37,123

Jose I. Garcia(4)

12,281

 

3,131

 

15,412

 

15,412

Sanjay Kapoor(4)

127,987

 

1,000

 

128,987

 

128,987

Samantha J. Marnick

43,739

 

 

31,122

 

74,861

 

 

74,861

53,525

 

30,100

 

83,625

 

83,625

Duane F. Hawkins

30,125

 

 

35,536

 

65,661

 

 

65,661

44,214

 

32,248

 

76,462

 

76,462

John A. Pilla(4)

80,950

 

 

31,126

 

112,076

 

 

112,076

All directors and executive officers as a group (18 persons)

430,551

 

 

421,417

 

851,968

39,165

 

891,133

(1)

With respect to executive officers, includes unvested time-based and performance-based restricted stock awards that are forfeitable until the vesting date or performance certification date, as applicable. Performance-based restricted stock awards are included in the table at target amounts. With respect to directors, includes unvested restricted stock awards that are forfeitable until the vesting date. Such awards are included herein as they confer voting rights and, therefore, are deemed to be beneficially owned under Rule 13d-3(a)(1) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

(2)

RSUs vest after one year of service as a director. However, RSUs are not payable until the director’s termination of service. At such time, the RSUs will be paid, at the Board’s option, in cash or shares of Common Stock based on the market value of Common Stock upon termination of service. All RSUs reflected are currently vested except for 3,237 RSUs held by Ms. Esteves.

(3)

Mr. Kapoor retired from the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on February 9, 2019. The values shown in the table assume no transactions have taken place since February 9, 2019, when Mr. Kapoor ceased to be an executive officer of the Company.

(4)

Excludes 16,023 phantom stock units Mr. Pilla is entitled to receive upon his retirement from the Company under the frozen Supplement Executive Retirement Plan.

John A. Pilla(5)

90,055

 

27,505

 

117,560

 

117,560

All directors and executive officers as a group (22 persons)

688,207

 

13,877

382,836

 

1,084,920

43,442

 

1,128,362

(1)

With respect to directors, includes unvested restricted stock awards vesting on May 6, 2020, but excludes RSUs vesting on such date. Restricted stock is included as it confers voting rights and, therefore, is deemed to be beneficially owned under Rule 13d-3(a)(1) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). RSUs do not confer voting rights until they are delivered upon the director’s departure, as described in footnote (3), below. For Mr. Kapoor, includes the final tranche of 1,000 shares of a retirement restricted stock award vesting on March 31, 2020.

(2)

With respect to executive officers, except for the 2020 performance-based restricted stock awards, which are not included as they were not yet priced on March 9, 2020, includes unvested time-based and performance-based restricted stock awards that are forfeitable until the vesting date or performance certification date, as applicable. Performance-based restricted stock awards are included in the table at target amounts.

(3)

RSUs vest after one year of service as a director. However, RSUs are not payable until the director’s termination of service. At such time, the RSUs will be paid, at the Board’s option, in cash or shares of Common Stock based on the market value of Common Stock upon termination of service. All RSUs reflected are currently vested except for 2,921 RSUs held by Ms. Esteves and 1,356 RSUs held by Dr. Cambone.

(4)

Mr. Kapoor resigned from the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on January 9, 2019, but remained with the Company as Senior Financial Advisor until March 31, 2019, when he retired. Mr. Garcia was appointed to the position of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on January 9, 2019, and resigned from the position on January 29, 2020. Mark J. Suchinski was appointed as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on January 29, 2020. For Messrs. Garcia and Kapoor, values shown assume no transactions have taken place since January 29, 2020 and January 9, 2019, respectively, except for those that are memorialized in their separation agreements.

(5)

Excludes 16,023 phantom stock units Mr. Pilla is entitled to receive upon his retirement from the Company under the frozen Supplement Executive Retirement Plan.

(1)

With respect to directors, includes unvested restricted stock awards vesting on May 6, 2020, but excludes RSUs vesting on such date. Restricted stock is included as it confers voting rights and, therefore, is deemed to be beneficially owned under Rule 13d-3(a)(1) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). RSUs do not confer voting rights until they are delivered upon the director’s departure, as described in footnote (3), below. For Mr. Kapoor, includes the final tranche of 1,000 shares of a retirement restricted stock award vesting on March 31, 2020.

(2)

With respect to executive officers, except for the 2020 performance-based restricted stock awards, which are not included as they were not yet priced on March 9, 2020, includes unvested time-based and performance-based restricted stock awards that are forfeitable until the vesting date or performance certification date, as applicable. Performance-based restricted stock awards are included in the table at target amounts.

(3)

RSUs vest after one year of service as a director. However, RSUs are not payable until the director’s termination of service. At such time, the RSUs will be paid, at the Board’s option, in cash or shares of Common Stock based on the market value of Common Stock upon termination of service. All RSUs reflected are currently vested except for 2,921 RSUs held by Ms. Esteves and 1,356 RSUs held by Dr. Cambone.

(4)

Mr. Kapoor resigned from the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on January 9, 2019, but remained with the Company as Senior Financial Advisor until March 31, 2019, when he retired. Mr. Garcia was appointed to the position of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on January 9, 2019, and resigned from the position on January 29, 2020. Mark J. Suchinski was appointed as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on January 29, 2020. For Messrs. Garcia and Kapoor, values shown assume no transactions have taken place since January 29, 2020 and January 9, 2019, respectively, except for those that are memorialized in their separation agreements.

(5)

Excludes 16,023 phantom stock units Mr. Pilla is entitled to receive upon his retirement from the Company under the frozen Supplement Executive Retirement Plan.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    31


Back to Contents

Beneficial Ownership of Major Stockholders

The following table sets forth information with respect to beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding securities as of February 25, 2019.March 9, 2020. The information set forth below is based on ownership statements filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 15(d) or 13(g) of the Exchange Act.

Name

Amount of

Shares

Beneficially

Owned

Percentage of

Common Stock

Sole

Voting

Shares

Shared

Voting

Shares

Sole

Investment

Shares

Shared

Investment

Shares

Amount of

Shares

Beneficially

Owned

Percentage of

Common Stock

Sole

Voting

Shares

Shared

Voting

Shares

Sole

Investment

Shares

Shared

Investment

Shares

5% STOCKHOLDERS

The Vanguard Group(1)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

 

10,560,087

 

9.91%

 

82,406

 

21,149

 

10,462,132

 

97,955

 

12,158,283

 

11.7%

 

80,732

 

24,525

 

12,062,285

 

95,998

Blackrock, Inc.(2)

55 E. 52nd St.

New York, NY 10005

7,376,265

7.0%

6,606,277

 

7,376,265

 

7,398,684

7.1%

6,609,228

 

7,398,684

 

Darsana Capital Partners LP(3)

Darsana Capital Partners GP LLC

Darsana Master Fund LP

Darsana Capital GP LLC

Anand Desai

40 West 57th Street, 15th Floor

New York, NY 10019

6,750,104

6.4%

 

6,750,104

 

6,750,104

(1)

Information is based on an amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2019.

(2)

Information is based on an amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 6, 2019.

(3)

Information is based on an amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2019.

Darsana Capital Partners LP(3)

Darsana Capital Partners GP LLC

Darsana Master Fund LP

Darsana Capital GP LLC

Anand Desai

40 West 57th St., 15th Floor

New York, New York 10019

6,237,000

5.95%

 

6,237,000

 

6,237,000

Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC(4)

2200 Ross Avenue, 31st Floor

Dallas, TX 75201

5,542,281

5.4%

4,003,276 

1,539,005

5,542,281 

 

(1)

Information is based on an amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020.

(2)

Information is based on an amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 6, 2020.

(3)

Information is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on March 9, 2020.

(4)

Information is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020.

(1)

Information is based on an amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020.

(2)

Information is based on an amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 6, 2020.

(3)

Information is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on March 9, 2020.

(4)

Information is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires directors, executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of any registered class of a company’s equity securities to file beneficial ownership reports with the SEC. Such reports are filed on Form 3, Form 4, and Form 5 under the Exchange Act, as appropriate. To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on a review of these reports and the reporting persons’ written representations, the Company believes that all filings required to be made by reporting persons holding the Company’s stockCommon Stock were timely filed in accordance with Section 16(a) in 2018, except for one Form 4 for Mr. Johnson (the “Late Form”). The Late Form regarded a sale of 500 shares on March 1, 2018, and was filed on May 9, 2018. The Late Form was not filed on a timely basis because the appropriate staff of the Company did not receive information about the sale until several weeks after it occurred.Exchange Act in 2019.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    32


Back to Contents

PROPOSAL 2

ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Overview

Stockholders are being asked to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, or NEOs, as set forth under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” This vote, which is referred to as the “say-on-pay” vote, is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of the Company’s NEOs and the objectives, policies, and practices described in this Proxy Statement. We conduct a say-on-pay vote annually. The Board believes that executive compensation, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, aligns with the Company’s peer group pay practices and furthers the Company’s compensation objectives.

Accordingly, the Board asks the Company’s stockholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed by the Company pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table, and other related tables and disclosures.”

The Board will review the voting results of Proposal 2 and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation.

Voting Standard

The affirmative vote of a majority of stockholders present, in person or by proxy, will constitute the stockholders’ non-binding approval with respect to Proposal 2.

With respect to Proposal 2, a stockholder may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN.” Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” Proposal 2. However, because abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present at the Annual Meeting and, therefore, they will have the effect of votes “AGAINST” Proposal 2.

Under the rules of the NYSE, brokers are prohibited from giving proxies to vote on executive compensation matters unless the beneficial owner of such shares has given voting instructions on the matter. This means that, if your broker is the record holder of your shares, you must give voting instructions to your broker with respect to Proposal 2 if you want your broker to vote your shares on the matter.

   The Board recommends you vote FOR the resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    33


Back to Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
  

Our 20182019 Named Executive Officers

34

Compensation Overview

35

Aligning Pay with Performance

35

Our Pay Metrics

36

The Company’s Performance

37

CEO Target Pay Compared to Peers

37

Significant Program-Wide2019 Compensation Decisions in 2018Program Elements

38

2018 Compensation Program ElementsVesting Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards

3842

20182019 NEO Performance and Compensation Decisions

4243

The Compensation Decision-Making Process

4445

Benchmarking

4546

Independent Compensation Consultant

4647

Clawback Policies

47

Consideration of Advisory Stockholder Vote on Executive Compensation

4647

Compensation Risk Assessment

4648

Other Compensation Elements and Information

4749

Summary Compensation Table

5052

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20182019

5356

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20182019 Fiscal Year End

5458

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year 20182019

5660

Pension Benefits

5761

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

5862

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control

5863

20182019 CEO Pay Ratio

6467

Compensation Committee Report

6467

Our 20182019 Named Executive Officers

The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the 20182019 compensation of our NEOs. Our 20182019 NEOs were:

THOMASThomas C.
GENTILE Gentile III

President and Chief Executive Officer

SANJAYKAPOORPresident & CEO

ExecutiveJose I. Garcia*

Former Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer (from January 9, 2019 through January 29, 2020)

Sanjay Kapoor**

SAMANTHAFormer Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (through January 9, 2019)

Samantha J.MARNICK Marnick

Executive Vice President,
Chief Administration Officer and Strategy

DUANEDuane F.HAWKINS Hawkins

Senior Vice President; President, Defense and Fabrication Division

JOHNJohn A.PILLA Pilla

Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer

*

Mr. Garcia resigned on January 29, 2020. Effective on such date, Mark J. Suchinski was appointed to the role of Senior Vice President and Quality OfficerChief Financial Officer. Mr. Suchinski is not discussed herein as he was not a NEO during 2019.

**

Due to Mr. Kapoor’s resignation from the role on January 9, 2019, specific discussion of Mr. Kapoor’s 2019 performance is not included below.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    34


Back to Contents

Compensation Overview

Our executive compensation program is designed to enable us to attract, retain, and incentivize executive officers who can deliver short-term performance results and longer-term stockholder value. The following highlights the key items the Compensation Committee considers in the development, review, and approval of the NEOs’ compensation.

Our Compensation Objectives

 

The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to:

1.

Attract,retain,andmotivatehighlyqualifiedexecutiveofficers. The Company aims to deliver compensation that is market-competitive and designed to retain qualified, experienced, and motivated executives in the competitive aerospace and defense industry.

2.

Reward/pay-for-performance. A substantial portion of total compensation for executive officers should be variable and deliver rewards based on Company and individual performance. Variable compensation motivates executives to perform. Company performance is measured against established metrics. Individual performance is measured against pre-established objectives and contributions to Company successes.

3.

AligninterestsofexecutiveofficerswiththoseoftheCompany’sstockholders. In order to align such interests, metrics for determining Company performance should be aligned to the Company’s financial results and the creation of stockholder value. Variable compensation should focus on the achievement of financial targets such as revenue, free cash flow, and total shareholder return.

4.

Ensurecompensationdoesnotencourageinappropriaterisk-taking. We mitigate risk-taking by balancing short- and long-term incentives, placing caps on potential payments, incorporating challenging performance goals, diversifying the metrics we use to measure performance, enforcing our stock ownership requirements, and maintaining our clawback policy.

Setting Target Pay

 

The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the target pay levels for our NEOs with respect to salary, our annual cash incentive, and our long-term incentives. In setting these levels, the Compensation Committee reviews peer group compensation levels and broad survey samplesdata provided by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews the individual responsibilities, goals, and challenges with respect to the position in question, along with the experience, prior performance, and potential of the individual in question. The Company generally sets total annual direct compensation of the NEOs (consisting of base salary, the annual cash incentive, and long-term incentives) at a target level that is at or around the market median, subject to individual circumstances and exceptions. Additional information about the Company’s peer group and compensation-setting process can be found under “The Compensation Decision-Making Process,” and “Benchmarking” sections.

Aligning Pay with Performance

The Company’s success depends largely on the efforts and contributions of its executives and their teams to deliver strong business results and increase stockholder value. The Company usesaligns pay with performance by using a balance of short- and long-term incentives as well as cash and non-cash compensation to reward NEOs for their roles in meeting Company objectives.compensation. For either short- or long-term incentives, executive officers have the opportunity to earn in excess of market median levels when performance exceeds expectations. Conversely, if performance falls below expectations, the incentives pay below target levels, if at all.

In 2018,2019, we linked pay with performance through the following variable pay:

Annual Cash Incentive (the “ACI”): a short-term incentive, which is paid in cash annually based on Company and individual performance. Company performance goals include revenue, earnings before interest and taxes, adjusted for certain items (“Adjusted EBIT”)*, and annual free cash flow, adjusted for certain items (“Adjusted FCF”)*, each over a one-year period.

Time-Based Restricted Stock: a long-term incentive consisting of an award of restricted Common Stock vesting ratably over three years. While vesting is not tied to performance, the increase or decrease in value that the executive receives between the award’s grant date and vesting date is tied to stock performance.

Performance-Based Restricted Stock: a long-term incentive consisting of an award of restricted Common Stock that will be earned at the end of a three-year performance period based on the Company’s total shareholderstockholder return relative to its peer group (“TSR”) and on free cash flow as a percentage of revenue (“FCF Percentage”)* over such period.

Additional information on our incentives can be found under “2018“2019 Compensation Program Elements.” Please see AppendixA for an explanation and reconciliation of non-GAAP measures.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    35


Back to Contents

Our Pay Metrics

The table below explains the metrics we used to measure performance with respect to the Company’s compensation. In the first quarter of each year, the Compensation Committee sets these goals based on the Company's strategy and operating plans. The specific goals are set forth under “2019 Compensation Program Elements.” Goals are established with the expectation that, if performance is aligned with our operating plans, target payout should be achieved. To obtain maximum goals, performance would have to exceed our plans significantly. We expect that achievement of both maximum performance and below threshold performance will be infrequent.

Program

Metric

Percentage of

Component /

Opportunity

How Performance is Calculated

Reason for Using Metric

ACI (Company Performance Component)

Revenue

20%

Top-line revenue in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), measured over a one-year period

Aligns with the Company’s strategy to grow the top line through winning new business with existing and new customers and the Company provides guidance on this metric

Adjusted EBIT*

30%

Adjusted EBIT* consists of earnings before interest and taxes, adjusted for non-core earnings impact, measured over a one-year period

Adjusted EBIT* is a common short-term measure of earnings, demonstrating growth in revenue and ability to control costs

Adjusted FCF*

50%

Adjusted FCF* is calculated by subtracting capital expenditures from GAAP cash from operating activities, measured over a one-year period and adjusted for certain items

Adjusted FCF* is used to align management incentives withto stockholders’ interests

ACI(IndividualPerformanceComponent)

Individual Performance Goals

100%

Achievement of individual performance goals relevant to each NEO’s assignment

To further incentivize personal performance and contributions to the current-year guidance provided to stockholdersCompany’s financial and operating results

Long-Term Incentive Program (Total Award Opportunity)

Stock Price (Time-Based Restricted Stock)

60%

This portion of the long-term incentive is calculated using a dollar amount, which results in a number of shares based on the price of Common Stock on the third trading day following the earnings call immediately after the grant is approved. Accordingly, the value received upon vesting is directly related to the change in the stock price between the grant date and the vesting date

This metric ties performance of executives’ restricted stock awards directly to stock price performance, thus aligning the interests of executives and stockholders

TSR (Performance-Based Restricted Stock)

20%

Performance is measured based on the ranking of the Company’s TSR, expressed as a percentile, relative to the TSR of the Company’s peer group over a three-year performance period as compared to threshold, target, and maximum performance goals

This metric ties executive interests to stockholder interests and aligns with proxy advisory policies and market trends

FCF Percentage* (Performance-Based Restricted Stock)

20%

Performance is measured based on the Company’s free cash flow* as a percentage of revenue over a three-year performance period as compared to threshold, target, and maximum performance goals

This metric is used to align long-term incentives with a key valuation driver of our business, which is free cash flow.* Since the Company does not provide multi-year free cash flow* guidance, aA percentage of sales is used to drive sustained free cash flow* performance consistent with our established long-term goal of 7-9% of sales; hence, the measurement is over a three-year period

*

Please see AppendixA for an explanation and reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures.

* Please see AppendixA for an explanation and reconciliation of these non-GAAP metrics.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    36


Back to Contents

The Company’s Performance

The Company’s one- and three-year total shareholderstockholder return compared to its peer group, the Russell 3000 index, and S&P 500 index, is set forth below.

 

Note:Note Regarding Chart Above: TSR is calculated in the chart above using adjusted close prices. Peer TSR is market-cap weighted at the beginning of each period. Three-year TSR is cumulative. The chart above includesIncludes data from all members of the Company’s 2016–182017–19 proxy peer group, excluding companies that were acquired during such period (Orbital ATK, B/E Aerospace, Rockwell Collins). Peer performance reflects the median performance of the peer group over the applicable period. For additional information on the companies within our peer group, see “2018“2019 Proxy Peer Group.” Source: S&P’s Capital IQ.

CEO Target Pay Compared to Peers

The target pay of our CEO as compared to the target pay of other CEOs in our peer group is set forth below:

 

Note:Note Regarding Chart Above: Represents 20172018 target CEO pay for companies within our peer group and 20182019 target CEO pay for the Company.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    37


Back to Contents

Significant Program-Wide Compensation Decisions in 2018

The Compensation Committee met in January 2018 to discuss and implement changes to the Company’s compensation program for the year. In large part, from a programmatic standpoint, the 2018 executive compensation program remained the same as the 2017 program except for the following:

What Changed

Why

UpdatedvestingtermsforTime-BasedRestrictedStockawardsonretirement,death,anddisability:

On retirement, death, or disability, the grantee will fully vest in his or her outstanding restricted stock. Retirement means termination on or after the date when the grantee reaches age 62

To be competitive with market practices

UpdatedvestingtermsforPerformance-BasedRestrictedStockawardsonretirement,death,anddisability:

On retirement, the grantee will vest in a prorated portion of his or her award based on the number of days continuously employed during the performance period, as calculated and certified by the Compensation Committee at the end of the applicable performance period. Retirement means termination on or after the date when the grantee reaches age 62. On death or disability, the grantee will vest in a prorated portion of his or her target award based on the number of days continuously employed during the performance period

To be competitive with market practices

Increasedthreshold,target,andmaximumgoalsonPerformance-BasedRestrictedStockawardstiedtoFCFPercentage:*

In 2017, the threshold, target, and maximum goals with respect to FCF Percentage* were 6.0%, 6.7%, and 7.4%, respectively. In 2018, the threshold, target, and maximum goals with respect to FCF Percentage* were 7.0%, 7.75%, and 9.0%, respectively

Incentivize higher levels of performance; better align with market expectations; better align with Company performance targets

*

Please see AppendixA for an explanation and reconciliation of these non-GAAP metrics.

20182019 Compensation Program Elements

There are three major components to the Company’s compensation program for NEOs:

Pay Structure

Compensation

Element

Description

Purpose

FIXEDCOMPENSATION

Base Salary

Cash compensation based on day-to-day responsibilities

Attracts and retains executive officers


Recognizes responsibilities, experience, and performance

VARIABLE,AT-RISKCOMPENSATION

Short-Term ACI

Annual cash incentive paid upon the achievement of Company performance goals relating to revenue, Adjusted EBIT,* and Adjusted FCF,* and individual objectives, each over a one-year period; no guaranteed payout

Motivates and rewards executives with respect to short-term performance


Aligns executive interests with stockholder interests

Long-Term Incentives

Time-Based Restricted Stock Award (60%)

Time-based award vesting over three years

Aids in retention


Aligns executive interests with long-term stockholder value creation


Promotes stock ownership

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards (40%)

Awards vest on achievement of two equally represented goals: relative TSR and FCF Percentage,* each over a three-year period; no guaranteed payout

Motivates and rewards executives with respect to long-term performance


Aligns executive interests with long-term stockholder value creation


Aids in retention

*

Please see AppendixA for an explanation and reconciliation of these non-GAAP metrics.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    38


Back to Contents

Base Salary

 

Base salary is a fixed cash amount designed to attract, retain, and motivate executive officers.officers, and recognize responsibilities, experience, and performance. In determining base salary, the Compensation Committee considers market data for comparable roles, experience, skill set, prior positions held, performance, and responsibility level. The Company reviews each NEO’s base salary annually in January (and as circumstances or changes in responsibilities may require) and makes appropriate adjustments to account for performance, additional responsibilities, and market movement. We set base salary amounts as set forth under “Setting“Compensation Overview - Setting Target Pay.”

Annual Cash Incentive

 

The ACI is an annual cash award granted under the Company’s Short-Term Incentive Plan (the “STIP”) under the 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended (the “OIP”).OIP. Each individual receives a total target ACI that is equal to a percentage of his or her total base salary. For 2018,2019, this target amount was equal to 100% of base salary for all NEOs other than the CEO (the “Other NEOs”). For our CEO, until February 1, 2019, the target amount was equal to 140% of our CEO’shis base salary and, 100%thereafter, 145% of the other NEOs’ (the “Other NEOs”)his base salaries.salary. We setestablish ACI target amounts as set forth under “Setting“Compensation Overview - Setting Target Pay.”

Payout of the ACI depends on the attainment of individual and Company performance goals. Depending on the level of performance achieved, payout can be between 0 - 200% of target. The objectives of the ACI are to support our pay-for-performance philosophy, align the awards with stockholder interests, and motivate executives to achieve the Company’s near-term focus on safety, quality, delivery, and customer focus that drives the Company’s long-term performance.

The performance weighting for the NEOs’ ACIs are as follows:

CEO: 80% Company performance; 20% individual performance

Other NEOs: 75% Company performance; 25% individual performance

With respect to the measurement of the performance components, the Compensation Committee used a scoring scale of 0.0 to 2.0, with 0.0 for unacceptable performance and 2.0 for exceptional performance. Individual scores are calibrated to the Company’s performance score as further described below.

Company Performance

The Company Performance component of each NEO’s 20182019 ACI is scored based on the performance of the Company with respect to three quantitative metrics, each over a one-year period:

Revenue, representing 20% of total Company performanceperformance;

Adjusted EBIT,* representing 30% of total Company performanceperformance; and

Adjusted FCF,* representing 50% of total Company performanceperformance.

The manner in which Adjusted EBITEBIT* and Adjusted FCFFCF* are calculated is described in Appendix A.

In 2018,2019, the Company exceeded its targetmaximum performance goal with respect to revenue and Adjusted FCF,* but did not reach its threshold goal with respect to revenue and Adjusted EBIT.* As a result, the Compensation Committee determined a 0.891.00 score had been achieved with respect to Company performance, representing a weighted score of 0.712 for the CEO (representing 80% of his total ACI score), and 0.6675 for each of the Other NEOs (representing 75% of their total ACI scores).performance. The following table summarizes the Company’s actual performance relative to the Company’s threshold, target, and maximum performance goals for 2018:2019:

20182019 ACI Company Metrics Performance

Measure

Weighting

Threshold

Target

Maximum

Actual Result

Assessment

Revenue

20%

$7.108.10 billion

$7.208.20 billion

$7.308.35 billion

$7.22 7.9billion

Exceeded TargetBelowThreshold

Adjusted EBIT*

30%

$975 million

$1.0251.057 billion

$1.075 billion

$880 million1.115 billion

$804.7million

BelowThreshold

Adjusted FCF*

50%

$535625 million

$550650 million

$600700 million

$565 723million

Exceeded TargetMaximum

*

The manner in which Adjusted EBIT and Adjusted FCF are calculated is described in AppendixA.

* The manner in which Adjusted EBIT and Adjusted FCF are calculated is described in AppendixA.SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    38


Back to Contents

Individual Performance

The Individual Performance component of the ACI is intended to further align executive compensation with performance in the Company’s focus areas in any given year by establishing relevant individual performance metrics that relate to each NEO’s assignments. This component was scored based on the achievement of such individual performance goals. Individual scores were calibrated to reflect the Company’s score, which was under the established target of 1.0 for 2018. For example, Mr. Gentile met expectations; however, because the Company score was a 0.89, his individual score was also a 0.89.score.

To determine the score for the CEO, the Compensation Committee reviewed his annual performance and personal contributions to the Company’s financial and operationaloperating results. With respect to the Other NEOs, the Compensation Committee first considered the report and recommendation of the CEO with respect to each person’s performance and score and, subsequently, the Compensation Committee conducted a subjective review of each NEO’s

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    39


Back to Contents

contributions to the Company during the fiscal year. With respect to 20182019 performance, the NEOs received the following individual performance scores: Gentile: 0.89, Kapoor: 0.89,1.00, Garcia: 1.00, Marnick: 1.09,1.08, Hawkins: 0.75,1.01, and Pilla: 1.04.1.03.

For additional payout information, please see “2018“2019 ACI Payouts.” Descriptions of the NEOs’ 20182019 individual performance contributions are set forth in “2018“2019 NEO Performance and Compensation Decisions.”

20182019 ACI Payouts

The formula for determining the 20182019 ACIs and the resulting payouts are reflected in the table below:

NEO

Base Salary

($)

(1) 

×

Target

(Percentage

of Base

Salary)

(%)

=

Target

Award

($)

×

Company

Performance

(80% weighting

for CEO; 75%

weighting for

Other NEOs)

 

(2) 

+

Individual

Performance

(20% weighting

for CEO; 25%

weighting for

Other NEOs)

(3) 

=

2018 Total

Payout

($)

Mr. Gentile

1,241,233

 

 

140

 

1,737,726

 

0.7120

 

 

0.1780

 

 

1,546,576

Mr. Kapoor

650,000

 

 

100

 

650,000

 

0.6675

 

 

0.2225

 

 

578,500

Ms. Marnick

522,877

 

 

100

 

522,877

 

0.6675

 

 

0.2725

 

 

491,504

Mr. Hawkins

533,685

 

 

100

 

533,685

 

0.6675

 

 

0.1875

 

 

456,301

Mr. Pilla

456,041

 

 

100

 

456,041

 

0.6675

 

 

0.2600

 

 

422,978

(1)

With respect to all NEOs other than Mr. Kapoor (his salary did not change in 2018), the ACI payout was calculated using a weighted-average base salary that takes into account their salary changes in 2018.

(2)

Reflects a Company score of 0.89 multiplied by the weighting percentage.

(3)

Reflects individual performance scores multiplied by the weighting percentage.

NEO

Base

Salary ($)

(1) 

×

Target

(Percentage

of Base

Salary)(2)

(%)

=

Target

Award

($)

×

Company

Performance

(80%

weighting for

CEO; 75%

weighting for

Other NEOs)

(3) 

+

Individual

Performance

(20%

weighting for

CEO; 25%

weighting for

Other NEOs)

(4) 

=

2019 Total

Payout

($)

Thomas C. Gentile III

1,295,753

 

 

145

 

1,873,535

 

0.8000

 

 

0.2000

 

 

1,873,535

Jose I. Garcia

615,000

 

 

100

 

615,000

 

0.7500

 

 

0.2500

 

 

615,000

Samantha J. Marnick

550,000

 

 

100

 

550,000

 

0.7500

 

 

0.2700

 

 

561,000

Duane F. Hawkins

535,000

 

 

100

 

535,000

 

0.7500

 

 

0.2525

 

 

536,338

John A. Pilla

475,000

 

 

100

 

475,000

 

0.7500

 

 

0.2575

 

 

478,563

(1)

With respect to Mr. Gentile, represents a weighted-average base salary that takes into account his salary change in 2019. Pursuant to Mr. Garcia’s employment agreement, he was entitled to his full ACI award for 2019 applicable to a salary of $615,000 (without proration); therefore, that is the salary included above.

(2)

With respect to Mr. Gentile, represents a weighted-average target that takes into account his target change in 2019 (actual number was 1.445903849).

(3)

Reflects a Company score of 1.0 multiplied by the weighting percentage.

(4)

Reflects individual performance scores multiplied by the weighting percentage.

 

Based on Company and individual performance results, the Compensation Committee believes the 20182019 NEO ACIs were appropriate and achieved the objectives of the executive compensation program. While the ACIs were earned based on performance in 2018,2019, they were paid out in January 2019.February 2020. The ACIsACI payouts are reported as 20182019 compensation in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.”

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    39


Back to Contents

Long-Term Incentives

 

Long-term incentives are an important component of compensation, as they provide long-term, equity-based variable incentive compensation in keeping with the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy for the entire executive group. Long-term incentives aid in retention, motivate, and reward executives with respect to long-term performance, align executives’ interests with stockholders’ interests, and promote stock ownership. Long-term incentives are delivered under the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) under the OIP. Under the OIP, the Compensation Committee selects eligible persons to receive such awards and determines the nature and amount of each such award. For 2018,2019, each NEO received an annual target LTIP award equal to the percentage of his or her total base salary, at the time of the award, as provided in the table below:

NEO

Base Salary

($)

x

Target (Percentage of Base

Salary)

(%)

=

Target

Award

($)

Mr. Gentile

1,250,000

 

500

 

6,250,000

Mr. Kapoor

650,000

 

300

 

1,950,000

Ms. Marnick

520,000

 

200

 

1,040,000

Mr. Hawkins

535,000

 

230

 

1,230,500

Mr. Pilla

455,000

 

190

 

864,500

NEO

Base Salary

($)

x

Target (Percentage of Base

Salary)

(%)

=

Target

Award

($)

Thomas C. Gentile III

1,300,000

 

550

 

7,150,000

Jose I. Garcia

615,000

 

200

 

1,230,000

Samantha J. Marnick

550,000

 

215

 

1,182,500

Duane F. Hawkins

535,000

 

230

 

1,230,500

John A. Pilla

475,000

 

190

 

902,500

The total annual target LTIP award consists of three components:

Time-Based Restricted Stock, representing 60% of the total target award amount;

Performance-Based Restricted Stock tied to relative TSR over a three-year performance period, representing 20% of the total target award amount; and

Performance-Based Restricted Stock tied to FCF Percentage over a three-year performance period, representing 20% of the total target award amount.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    40


Back to Contents

Time-Based Restricted Stock

In 2018,2019, 60% of the target award amount was delivered in the form of a Time-Based Restricted Stock award vesting in three equal installments on each of the first, second, and third anniversaries of the grant date, subject to the recipient being employed by the Company on the vesting date. The Compensation Committee grants Time-Based Restricted Stock awards to assist in retaining NEOs and increase their stock ownership, which further aligns our NEOs’ interests with those of stockholders. Awards are approved by the Compensation Committee in January and granted in February of each year.after the Company's subsequent earnings release. The number of shares granted is determined based on the average of the opening and closing Common Stock prices on the third trading day after the Company’s earnings release immediately following the date the award is approved by the Compensation Committee.

Dividends on Time-Based Restricted Stock awards accrue from the grant date and are paid out on vesting. If the underlying award is forfeited, the accrued dividends are forfeited as well.

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Tied to Total ShareholderStockholder Return

In 2018,2019, 20% of the target award amount was delivered in the form of a Performance-Based Restricted Stock award tied to TSR. Payout of the award is based on the ranking of the Company’s TSR, expressed as a percentile, relative to the TSR of a group of the Company’s peers over a three-year tracking period as compared to threshold, target, and maximum performance goals. Participants are initially granted a number of unvested shares equal to the number of vested shares to which the participant would be entitled upon achievement of the target performance goal.

The table below sets forth these performance goals and vesting percentages:

 

 

Threshold*

Target

Maximum

Performance Goal

(Percentile Ranking in Peer Group)

25th

50th

90th

Vesting Percentage

(% of Target Award)

25%

100%

200%

*

If performance is below threshold, payout is zero.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    40


Back to Contents

For grants made in 2018,2019, the performance period runs from January 1, 2018,2019 to December 31, 2020,2021, and the vesting of the awards is dependent upon the Compensation Committee’s certification of the performance goal being achieved. An individual must be continuously performing services (or deemed to be continuously performing services) throughout the entire performance period, or none of the award will be earned.

For grants made in 2018,2019, the TSR for the Company and each member of its peer group for the tracking period will be determined by calculating the percentage increase in the dividend-adjusted average closing share price for the 20 trading days ending December 31, 2017,2018, and the 20 trading days ending December 31, 2020.2021. If the Company’s TSR percentile ranking falls between the threshold and the target performance goals or the target and the maximum performance goals, the percentage of the award that a participant will receive is interpolated on a straight-line basis. If the Company’s TSR percentile ranking is below the threshold performance goal, the participant will not be entitled to any vested shares, and if the Company’s TSR percentile ranking is equal to or higher than the maximum performance goal, the participant will be entitled to a number of vested shares equal to 200% of the target award. If the Company’s TSR is negative, payout is capped at 100% regardless of percentile ranking. The Compensation Committee may apply negative discretion to the award payout. Dividends on Performance-Based Restricted Stock awards tied to TSR doare not accruepaid or accrued until the award vests.

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Tied to FCF Percentage

In 2018,2019, 20% of the target award amount was delivered in the form of a Performance-Based Restricted Stock award tied to FCF Percentage.* Payout of the award is based on the Company’s free cash flow as a percentage of revenue over a three-year tracking period as compared to threshold, target, and maximum performance goals. FCF PercentagePercentage* is a measure of long-term cash generation driven by increasing revenue, reducing costs, improving productivity, and efficiently using capital. Participants are initially granted a number of unvested shares equal to the number of vested shares to which the participant would be entitled on achievement of the target performance goal.

The table below sets forth these performance goals and vesting percentages:

 

Threshold*

Target

Maximum

 

Threshold*

Target

Maximum

Performance Goal

FCF Percentage

7.0%

7.75%

9.0%

FCF Percentage*

7.0%

7.75%

9.0%

Vesting Percentage

(% of Target Award)

25%

100%

200%

(% of Target Award)

25%

100%

200%

*

If performance is below threshold, payout is zero.

*

If performance is below threshold, payout is zero.

*

If performance is below threshold, payout is zero.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    41


Back to Contents

For grants made in 2018,2019, the performance period runs from January 1, 2018,2019 to December 31, 2020,2021, and the vesting of the awards is dependent on the Compensation Committee’s certification of the performance goal being achieved. An individual must be continuously performing services through the entire performance period, or none of the award will be earned.

FCF PercentagePercentage* will be calculated on a cumulative basis over a three-year period (total free cash flow over three years divided by total revenue over three years). If the calculated percentage falls between the threshold and the target performance goals or the target and the maximum performance goals, the percentage of the award that a participant will receive is interpolated on a straight-line basis. If the Company’s percentage is below the threshold performance goal, the participant will not be entitled to any vested shares, and if the Company’s percentage is equal to or greater than the maximum performance goal, the participant will be entitled to a number of vested shares equal to 200% of the target award. The Compensation Committee may apply negative discretion to the award payout. Dividends on Performance-Based Restricted Stock awards tied to FCF Percentage doPercentage* are not accruepaid or accrued until the award vests.

For an explanation and reconciliation of FCF Percentage, please see Appendix A.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    41


Back to Contents

Vesting Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards

2016Awards: The only performance-based restricted stock award that vested in 2019 was tied to TSR. Payout of the award was based on the ranking of the Company’s TSR, expressed as a percentile, relative to the TSR of a group of the Company’s peers over a three-year tracking period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018, as compared to threshold, target, and maximum performance goals. On January 23, 2019, the Compensation Committee certified performance of the award at a percentile rank of 50th within the peer group. As a result, the award paid out at 100% (the payout was entirely in stock), as demonstrated in the table below:

 

 

Threshold*

Target

Maximum

2016 PB-TSR

Actual Performance

Performance Goal

(Percentile Ranking in Peer Group)

25th

50th

90th

50th

Vesting Percentage

(% of Target Award)

25%

100%

200%

100%

2017Awards: Two types of performance-based restricted stock awards vested in 2020. The first award type was tied to TSR and payout was determined consistently with the 2016 award described above. The award had a performance tracking period from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. On January 21, 2020, the Compensation Committee certified performance of the award at a percentile rank of 58th within the peer group. As a result, the award paid out at 120% (the payout was entirely in stock), as demonstrated in the table below:

 

 

Threshold*

Target

Maximum

2017 PB-TSR

Actual Performance

Performance Goal

(Percentile Ranking in Peer Group)

25th

50th

90th

58th

Vesting Percentage

(% of Target Award)

25%

100%

200%

120%

The second type of performance-based restricted stock award that vested in 2020 was tied to FCF Percentage.* Payout of the award was based on the Company’s free cash flow* as a percentage of revenue over a three-year tracking period from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, as compared to threshold, target, and maximum performance goals. On January 21, 2020, the Compensation Committee certified performance of the award at 7.82%, which reflected an adjustment to Free Cash Flow* for the return of a cash payment of $236 million received from Boeing associated with the B787 interim pricing agreement. While the Company generally intends to base FCF Percentage* on Free Cash Flow* as opposed to Adjusted FCF,* an adjustment was appropriate in this circumstance as the Company excluded the receipt of the cash payments from Boeing in 2015 ($192 million) and 2016 ($43 million) from its applicable free cash flow* performance determination. As a result, the award paid out at 200% (the payout was entirely in stock), as demonstrated in the table below:

 

 

Threshold*

Target

Maximum

2017 PB-FCF

Actual Performance

Performance Goal

FCF Percentage*

6.0%

6.7%

7.4%

7.82%

Vesting Percentage

(% of Target Award)

25%

100%

200%

200%

*

For an explanation and reconciliation of FCF Percentage and other non-GAAP measures, please see Appendix A.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    42


Back to Contents

2019 NEO Performance and Compensation Decisions

Mr. Gentile, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

20182019 Performance: Mr. Gentile’s 20182019 individual performance met expectations. He continued the Company’s diversification and growth strategy with the FMI acquisition and pending acquisition of select assets of Bombardier aerostructures and aftermarket, and securing new work content from current and new customers. Mr. Gentile also successfully led the Company to overcome multiplethrough important customer negotiations, the B737 MAX grounding, supply chain challengesrisks, and achieve financial and operational results that aligned with our original plans. He reduced Company risk and strengthened our partnership with Boeing by securing a long-term contract that extends into the next decade, executed a new growth strategy by securing newly contracted work content on several programs, and continued to drive significant improvement in supply chain costs.safety improvements.

20182019 Compensation Decisions:

Salary: In January 2018,2019, the Compensation Committee approved an increase from $1,150,000$1,250,000 to $1,250,000,$1,300,000, effective February 2, 2018.1, 2019. The increase was based on an evaluation of Mr. Gentile’s performance and target compensation as compared to the Company’s peer group.

Annual Cash Incentive: No changes were made toIn January 2019, the Compensation Committee approved an increase of Mr. Gentile’s target during 2018. Mr. Gentile’s target wasfrom 140% to 145% of his base salary. In January 2019,2020, based on a review of Mr. Gentile’s and the Company’s performance during 2018,2019, the Compensation Committee approved an ACI payout of $1,546,576.$1,873,535.

Long-Term Incentives: The Compensation Committee approved an increase of Mr. Gentile’s target amount from 450%500% to 500%550% of salary effective February 2, 2018.1, 2019. The increase was based on an evaluation of Mr. Gentile’s performance and target compensation as compared to the Company’s peer group. In February 2018,2019, Mr. Gentile was granted awards with an aggregate grant date fair value of $6,250,140.$7,150,017. Aggregate grant date fair values were determined as set forth in footnote (6) to the “Summary Compensation Table.”

Mr. Kapoor, ExecutiveGarcia, Former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

20182019 Performance: Mr. Kapoor’s 2018 individual performance met expectations. Mr. Kapoor delivered significant improvements in working capital, refinanced our debt, and drove stockholder value by executing an accelerated share repurchase plan. Mr. Kapoor retiredGarcia resigned from the position of ExecutiveSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on January 9, 2019.29, 2020.

20182019 Compensation Decisions:

Salary: Mr. Kapoor’sGarcia’s salary remained at $650,000.$615,000.

Cash Sign-On: Mr. Garcia received a cash sign-on award of 250,000 in 2019 (a second sign-on award of $500,000 was paid in 2020).

Annual Cash Incentive: No changes were made to Mr. Kapoor’sGarcia’s target during 2018.2019. Mr. Kapoor’sGarcia’s target was 100% of salary. Per Mr. Garcia’s Resignation Agreement and Release, Mr. Garcia received an ACI payout of $615,000.

Long-Term Incentives: No changes were made to Mr. Garcia’s target during 2019. Mr. Garcia’s target was 200% of salary. In February 2019, Mr. Garcia was granted an equity sign-on award with a grant date fair value of $1,000,081, and annual awards with an aggregate grant date fair value of $1,230,147. In November 2019, Mr. Garcia was granted a one-time service award with an aggregate grant date fair value of $500,065. Aggregate grant date fair values were determined as set forth in footnote (6) to the “Summary Compensation Table.”

Ms. Marnick, Executive Vice President, Chief Administration Officer & Strategy

2019 Performance: Ms. Marnick’s 2019 individual performance exceeded expectations. She advanced the Company’s growth strategy through pursuit of strategic acquisitions, delivered substantial new business wins, further improved fringe costs, led the advancement of Company values, achieved significant labor relations results with the early negotiation of the SPEEA-WTPU contract, and established the foundation for successful contract negotiations with the IAM in early 2020.

2019 Compensation Decisions:

Salary: Ms. Marnick’s salary remained at $550,000.

Annual Cash Incentive: No changes were made to Ms. Marnick’s target during 2019. Ms. Marnick’s target was 100% of salary. In January 2019,2020, based on a review of Mr. Kapoor’sMs. Marnick’s and the Company’s performance during 2018,2019, the Compensation Committee approved an ACI payout of $578,500.$561,000.

Long-Term Incentives: The Compensation Committee approved an increaseNo changes were made to Ms. Marnick’s target during 2019. Ms. Marnick’s target was 215% of Mr. Kapoor’s target amount from 280% to 300% effective February 2, 2018. The increase was based on an evaluation of Mr. Kapoor’s performance and target compensation as compared to the Company’s peer group.salary. In February 2018, Mr. Kapoor2019, Ms. Marnick was granted awards with an aggregate grant date fair value of $1,950,174.$1,182,704. Aggregate grant date fair values were determined as set forth in footnote (6) to the “Summary Compensation Table.”

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    4243


Back to Contents

Ms. Marnick, Executive Vice President and Chief Administration Officer

2018 Performance: Ms. Marnick’s 2018 individual performance exceeded expectations. She successfully executed the Company’s growth strategy and delivered substantial new business wins, realigned and developed senior talent, significantly improved fringe costs, secured critical government incentives for growth, executed significant union contract extensions, led Company culture change, and improved key stakeholder relationships.

2018 Compensation Decisions:

Salary: In January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved an increase from $490,000 to $520,000, effective February 2, 2018. The increase was based on an evaluation of Ms. Marnick’s performance, level of responsibility, and target compensation as compared to the Company’s peer group. In October 2018, the Compensation Committee approved an increase from $520,000 to $550,000, effective October 23, 2018. The increase was based on the addition of responsibilities to Ms. Marnick’s role, including strategy and business and regional jets.

Annual Cash Incentive: No changes were made to Ms. Marnick’s target during 2018. Ms. Marnick’s target was 100% of salary. In January 2019, based on a review of Ms. Marnick’s and the Company’s performance during 2018, the Compensation Committee approved an ACI of $491,504.

Long-Term Incentives: The Compensation Committee approved an increase of Ms. Marnick’s target amount from 190% to 200% effective February 2, 2018. The increase was based on an evaluation of Ms. Marnick’s performance, level of responsibility, and target compensation as compared to the Company’s peer group. In February 2018, Ms. Marnick was granted awards with an aggregate grant date fair value of $1,040,241. Aggregate grant date fair values were determined as set forth in footnote (6) to the “Summary Compensation Table.” In October 2018, the Compensation Committee approved an increase of Ms. Marnick’s target amount from 200% to 215% effective October 23, 2018 (to affect the long-term incentives to be granted in future years). The increase was based on the addition of responsibilities to Ms. Marnick’s role, including strategy and business and regional jets.

Mr. Hawkins, Senior Vice President; President, Defense and Fabrication Division of Spirit AeroSystems, Inc.

 

20182019 Performance: Mr. Hawkins’ 20182019 individual performance met expectations overall. Despite multiple challenges in the Boeing 737 production line in 2018, he helped the line recover and ended the year strong on deliveries.exceeded expectations. He successfully exceeded expectationscompleted the development and integration of a comprehensive defense and fabrication business while executing superior performance of existing programs. He made significant progress on growing both businesses by expanding work on existing programs, new business wins, and established a healthy new business backlog. He successfully shaped and built strong relationships and increased Spirit’s brand awareness with key strategic customers and stakeholders including defense programs, resulting in growthprimes and Congressional delegation leadership. He led the first defense acquisition and integration of FMI, combining strong material systems and industrialization capability to the Company’sstrategically position Spirit for high priority defense business.programs.

20182019 Compensation Decisions:

Salary: In January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved an increase from $520,000 to $535,000, effective February 2, 2018. The increase was based on an evaluation of Mr. Hawkins’ performance, level of responsibility, and target compensation as compared to the Company’s peer group.salary remained at $535,000.

Annual Cash Incentive: No changes were made to Mr. Hawkins’ target during 2018.2019. Mr. Hawkins’ target was 100% of salary. In January 2019,2020, based on a review of Mr. Hawkins’ and the Company’s performance during 2018,2019, the Compensation Committee approved an ACI payout of $456,301.$536,338.

Long-Term Incentives: The Compensation Committee approved an increase ofNo changes were made to Mr. Hawkins’ target amount from 220% to 230% effective February 2, 2018. The increase was based on an evaluation ofduring 2019. Mr. Hawkins’ performance, leveltarget was 230% of responsibility, and target compensation as compared to the Company’s peer group.salary. In February 2018,2019, Mr. Hawkins was granted awards with an aggregate grant date fair value of $1,230,603.$1,230,696. Aggregate grant date fair values were determined as set forth in footnote (6) to the “Summary Compensation Table.”

Mr. Pilla, Senior Vice President, Chief Technology and Quality Officer

 

20182019 Performance: Mr. Pilla’s 20182019 individual performance exceeded expectations. He established new research and technology (“R&T”) strategies positioning Spirit to take onthat developed a future composite skin / stringer approach (ASTRA) that won global awards. His R&T team won new commercial and defense packages. Mr. Pilla also led Spirit engineering and quality teams in factory automation efforts and production initiatives that increasedrelated to the factories’ abilityB767 S41 Integration and the A320 Spoiler. Mr. Pilla continued to manage rate growth in the future.develop distinctive capability strategies, achieving thought leadership as measured by patents, trade secrets, papers, and key university and industry partnerships.

20182019 Compensation Decisions:

Salary: In January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved an increase from $425,000 to $455,000, effective February 2, 2018. The increase was based on an evaluation of Mr. Pilla’s performance, level of responsibility, and target compensation as compared to the Company’s peer group. In October 2018, the Compensation Committee approved an increase from $455,000 to $475,000, effective October 23, 2018. The increase was based on an evaluation of Mr. Pilla’s performance, additional level of responsibility, and target compensation as compared to the Company’s peer group.salary remained at $475,000.

Annual Cash Incentive: No changes were made to Mr. Pilla’s target during 2018.2019. Mr. Pilla’s target was 100% of salary. In January 2019, based on a review of Mr. Pilla’s and the Company’s performance during 2018,2019, the Compensation Committee approved an ACI payout of $422,978.$478,563.

Long-Term Incentives: No changes were made to Mr. Pilla’s target during 2018.2019. Mr. Pilla’s target amount was 190%. of salary. In February 2018,2019, Mr. Pilla was granted awards with an aggregate grant date fair value of $864,680. In October 2018, Mr. Pilla was granted a Time-Based Restricted Stock award with an aggregate grant date fair value of $500,064.$902,629. Aggregate grant date fair values were determined as set forth in footnote (6) to the “Summary Compensation Table.”

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    4344


Back to Contents

The Compensation Decision-Making Process

TheAs set forth in its Charter, the Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing, implementing, and monitoring compliance withoverseeing the administration of the Company’s compensation objectives.plans, policies, and programs. Further, the Compensation Committee is responsible for setting compensation for, and reviewing performance of, the Company’s executive officers. Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee has the authority to delegate its responsibilities to such subcommittees as it deems appropriate, so long as the subcommittee is solely comprised of one or more members of the Compensation Committee. In setting executive officer compensation, the Compensation Committee takes into consideration the following:

The CEO’s self-assessment and performance review of the Other NEOs;

The Compensation Committee’s and Board’s views of the NEOs’ performance;

The counsel and recommendations of the Company’s CEO and Chief Administration Officer;CAO (who is responsible for the Company’s human resources team);

Recommendations of other members of the Compensation Committee;

Results from benchmarking against the Company’s peer group and survey data; and

The analysis and consulting advice of its independent compensation consultant.consultant with respect to the amount or form of such compensation.

Generally, the Compensation Committee strives for internal pay equity among the Company’s NEOs and accordingly, the types of compensation and benefits offered to the Company’s NEOs are consistent among the group. The Compensation Committee continues to examine existing and new compensation programs and practices to ensure that the Company’s compensation programs remain appropriate and consistent with the Company’s overall objectives and market practice.

The chart below reflects the annual compensation-setting process by regularly scheduled meeting of the Compensation Committee.Committee (certain items may shift during the year). In addition to the following, the CEO’s performance, along with all Company performance metrics used in the ACI or long-term incentives, are monitored and discussed quarterly.

 

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    4445


Back to Contents

Benchmarking

Each year, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of management and the independent compensation consultant, reviews external market data in order to determine the competitiveness of our compensation packages, highlight trends and regulatory implications, and develop incentive plan design alternatives. The market data reviewed is from the Company’s peer group and nationally recognized published survey data.

20182019 Proxy Peer Group

 

The Company uses its peer group as a reference point for compensation design and award decisions. The Company’s peer group consists of companies similar to Spirit in size and operations (emphasizing aerospace and defense and auto-component manufacturers) and/or companies that compete with Spirit for executive talent. For 2018,2019, the Company’s peer group was as follows (the companies are ranked by revenue and all ticker symbols are for the NYSE):

Company Name

2017 Revenue

($ in billions)

Market Cap as of 12/31/2017

($ in billions)

2018 Revenue

($ in billions)

Market Cap as of 12/31/2018

($ in billions)

Trane Technologies (f/k/a Ingersoll-Rand plc) (TT)

15.7

22.4

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

14.3

19.7

Arconic (ARNC)

14.0

8.1

Textron (TXT)

14.2

14.9

14.0

11.2

Ingersoll-Rand (IR)

14.2

22.3

Arconic (ARNC)

13.0

13.1

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

12.0

26.6

Tenneco (TEN)

11.8

2.2

Borg Warner (BWA)

9.8

10.8

10.5

7.2

L3 Technologies (LLL)

9.6

15.5

10.2

13.7

Tenneco (TEN)

9.3

3.0

Huntington Ingalls (HII)

7.4

10.7

8.2

8.2

Spirit AeroSystems Holdings (SPR)

7.0

10.1

7.2

7.6

Harris Corp (HRS)

5.9

16.9

6.4

16.2

Terex (TEX)

4.4

4.1

4.5

2.0

Triumph Group (TGI)

3.5

1.4

3.2

0.6

Teledyne Technologies (TDY)

2.6

6.4

2.9

7.5

Moog (MOG-A)

2.5

3.1

2.7

2.7

Curtiss-Wright (CW)

2.3

5.4

2.4

4.5

Hexcel (HXL)

2.2

4.9

Esterline Technologies Corporation (ESL)

2.0

2.2

2.0

3.6

Changes to Proxy Peer Group for 2019Changes

 

In JanuaryNo affirmative changes were made to the Company’s proxy peer group after the grant of long-term incentives in 2019, but the Compensation Committee evaluatednoted that Harris Corp (HRS) was acquired by L3 Technologies (LLL) in July 2019, and Esterline Technologies Corporation (ESL) was acquired by TransDigm Group Inc. (the surviving company is not in the Company’s peer group and added Hexcel (HXL) to the peer group, effective with the Performance-Based Restricted Stock awards tied to TSR that were grantedgroup) in FebruaryMarch 2019.

Survey Data

 

In addition to benchmarking using the peer group, the Company also uses a broad survey sample from the independent compensation consultant’s executive compensation survey. The survey analysis considers companies in relevant industries (aerospace and defense, machinery, auto-component, and electrical equipment) as well as companies in other industries, when necessary, to complement data limitations. Survey data was size-adjusted to approximate the Company’s revenue either through regression or by limiting the survey sample to comparably sizedcomparably-sized companies. This information was used by the Compensation Committee in establishing the compensation packages and target goals for the NEOs.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    4546


Back to Contents

Independent Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee’s Charter allows the committee to engage an independent compensation consultant to advise on executive compensation matters. For 2018,2019, the Compensation CommitteeCompany engaged Willis Towers Watson directly for the purpose of providing analysis and advice with respect to compensation matters. matters to the Compensation Committee. The consultant's engagement and fees related to work conducted for the Compensation Committee were reviewed and pre-approved by the Compensation Committee.

In addition to consulting services for the Compensation Committee, which were $189,219 in 2019, Willis Towers Watson provided other services to the Company during 2019 totaling $544,496. Of such amount, $406,974 related to due diligence support for acquisitions, and $137,522 related to a diversity and inclusion assessment conducted with respect to the Company’s employee population.

The Compensation Committee has determined, after considering and discussing criteria from the SEC and NYSE and Willis Towers Watson’s annual independence letter, that Willis Towers Watson does not have any conflicts of interest that would prevent objectivity.

Clawback Policies

The Company’s ACI and LTIP awards are subject to the clawback provision of the OIP, any applicable law and the Company’s 2017 Clawback Policy (the “2017 Policy”). The OIP clawback provision provides that the Compensation Committee may take certain actions, including canceling an award or causing the participant to forfeit any gains realized in connection with the award, if the participant, without the consent of the Company, engages in a detrimental activity. Detrimental activities include breaches of restrictive covenants, such as confidentiality, non-solicitation, and non-compete covenants, and any activity contributing to financial restatement or accounting irregularities that are appropriate to include in the 2017 Policy.

The 2017 Policy applies to the ACI and performance-based restricted stock awards (the “Covered Compensation”) held by current and former Section 16 officers of the Company (the “Covered Executives”). Specifically, in the event of a material restatement to the Company’s financial results due to material noncompliance by the Company with financial reporting requirements under applicable securities law (the “Triggering Event”), the result of which being that Covered Compensation would have been lower had it been calculated taking into account the effect of the Triggering Event, the Compensation Committee has the authority (subject to certain procedures and exceptions) to seek to recover excess compensation received by the Covered Executives.

Consideration of Advisory Stockholder Vote on Executive Compensation

The Company believes it is appropriate to seek and reflect the views of its stockholders on the design and effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program. Accordingly, consistent with the Company’s most recent say-on-pay frequency vote in April 2017, the Company holds an annual say-on-pay vote. At the Company’s 20182019 annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 90%91% of stockholders present in person or by proxy voted in favor of the Company’s executive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee takes the annual say-on-pay proposal voting results into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    47


Back to Contents

Compensation Risk Assessment

In October each year, andAnnually (and as otherwisefrequently as deemed necessary,necessary), the Compensation Committee assesses risks presented by our compensation program, policies, and award structures. This assessment is used to determine whether any of our compensation components incentivize executives to take risks that are not in the Company’s or stockholders’ best interests. In 2018,2019, our Compensation Committee reviewed the following risk factors relative to our current compensation programs:

Senior talent acquisition and the ability to recruit and retain talent at market-based compensation levels.levels;

Senior talent loss due to misalignment of strategic decisions and incentives, including balancing long-term incentives with the investment requirement for long-term objectives.objectives;

MatchingAlignment of compensation to Company performance in relation to meeting stockholder expectations to balance short- and long-term incentives to achieve growth strategies.Company performance;

��

Potential for material restatement of earnings to impact incentive plan calculations.calculations;

Clawback policy requirements aligned with market in regard to talent recruitment and retention.retention;

Potential for unforeseen one-time events beyond management’s control that affect incentive plan calculations.calculations;

Potential for management decisions based on short-term objectives unbalanced with long-term Company performance.performance; and

Potential for unrealized talent investment due to underperforming individuals.

After reviewing our current compensation program and award structures, the Compensation Committee determined that our program does not incentivize executives to take suchexcessive risks in light of the following features:

We diversify the compensation delivered to executives - the individual components and performance goals each incentivize different behaviors (short-term focus, long-term focus, etc.) in an attempt to balance our executives’ interests;

We have maximum payouts, or caps, on our performance-based compensation - the highest amount that can be paid with respect to our ACIs or performance-based long-term incentives is 200%;

The Compensation Committee reserves the right to exercise negative discretion over performance-based awards;

We delivermaintain clawback policies that allow recovery of certain compensation using several vehicles, including cash, stock, and perquisites;

We maintain a clawback policy that allows us to recover compensation awarded based on certain improper conduct by executives;when the participant has engaged in misconduct;

Our NEOs and other executives must comply with stringent stock ownership requirements; and

We have engaged an independent compensation consultant to advise us on compensation practices.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    4648


Back to Contents

Other Compensation Elements and Information

Benefits and Perquisites

 

In addition to the four basic compensation elements, we provide our NEOs with the additional benefits and perquisites described below. Benefits and perquisites received by NEOs are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.” These benefits are based on an assessment of benefits offered by our peers and competitors and are important for retaining the Company’s executive officers.

Benefit/Perquisite

Explanation

Retirement and Savings Plan (the “RSP”)

The RSP is a tax-qualified defined contribution plan for certain eligible salaried employees. The Company makes both matching and non-matching contributions under the RSP.


Matching: The Company matches 75% of the employee’s contributions up to a maximum of 6% of the employee’s base pay (provided the employee contributes 8%). The matching contributions are immediately 100% vested.


Non-Matching: The Company makes an additional,a non-matching contribution following the end of each calendar year based on an employee’s age and vesting service, provided that the employee is employed by the Company on December 31 of the applicable year and has earned a year of vesting service. If age plus vesting service totals less than 60, employees receive a contribution equal to 1.5% of base salary; if age plus vesting service totals at least 60 but less than 80, employees receive a contribution equal to 3% of base salary; and if age plus vesting service totals 80 or more, employees receive a contribution equal to 4.5% of base salary. These contributions are 25% vested at two years, 50% vested at three years, 75% vested at four years, and 100% vested at five years of vesting service.


Transition Contribution: An additional contribution is available to employees who were previously Boeing employees and meet certain other requirements. Other than Mr. Pilla, none of the NEOs is eligible for this additional contribution. Mr. Pilla receives an annual transition contribution amount of 3.5% of his base salary. All such contributions are vested immediately as Mr. Pilla has met the five-year service requirement. The transition contribution will cease after 2020, with final payment for the first six months of 2020 made in 2021.

Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DCP”)

This nonqualified plan allows eligible Spirit employees, including each of our NEOs, to defer receipt of a portion of their base salary or ACI. In addition, the DCP allows for discretionary contributions by the Company into a separate account in the DCP. Deferred amounts and discretionary Company contributions are credited with a rate of return equal to 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate for October of the prior fiscal year. For 2019, the interest crediting rate is 3.59%.

Perquisite Allowance Plan

Under the Company’s Perquisite Allowance Plan, the CEO receives an annual allowance of $25,000, while the Other NEOs receive an annual allowance of $13,000. Participants may select the perquisite items to be funded from their allowances subject to certain limitations set forth in the Perquisite Allowance Plan. Any portion of a participant’s annual allowance not used by the end of the applicable calendar year is forfeited except upon a qualifying termination in a change-in-control. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control.”

Executive Security

Some of our NEOs receive personal or home security provisions. These provisions are based on business-related security concerns and have been assessed by an independent security consulting firm and deemed necessary and appropriate for the protection of the Company’s NEOs.

Personal Corporate Aircraft Use

For security reasons, the Company’s CEO and certain executivesCAO are authorized to use the corporate aircraft for a limited amount of personal travel. Mr. Gentile and Ms. Marnick are authorized to use the aircraft for 70 personal hours annually, and 25 personal hours annually, respectively (deadhead or ferry flights do not count towards their usage). Other NEOs do not use the corporate aircraft for personal travel unless approved by the CEO. No tax gross-ups are provided for this benefit.

Relocation Benefits

We provide relocation assistance to employees including our NEOs. In 2018,2019, the Company provided Mr. GentileGarcia relocation assistance for certain qualified relocation expenses. Where appropriate, the Company provides a gross-up to cover tax liabilities associated with relocation assistance.

Post-Retirement Medical Coverage

The Company has two programs for post-retirement medical coverage. Under the first program, benefits are available to employees who were previously Boeing employees and who retire from the Company between the ages of 62 and 65 (and who meet certain other requirements). Under the second program, benefits are available to (i) employees who retire from the Company at age 55 or later with ten10 years of service, to the Company, and (ii) employees who retire from the Company at age 60 or later with five years of service to the Company.service. Under either program, benefits cease at age 65. Other than Mr. Pilla, none of our NEOs is currently eligible for this coverage.coverage under either program.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    4749


Back to Contents

Discontinued and Frozen Benefit Plans and Arrangements

 

The Company pays certain benefits through discontinued and frozen benefit plans and arrangements, which include the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”) and the Pension Value Plan (the “PVP”). A significant portion of Spirit’s operations related to Boeing aerostructures was owned and controlled by Boeing until 2005. In connection with the acquisition of these assets from Boeing, the Company adopted the SERP in order to attract certain employees from Boeing. The SERP provides supplemental, nonqualified retirement benefits to executives who (1) had their benefits transferred from a Boeing nonqualified plan to the SERP, and (2) did not elect to convert their SERP benefit into phantom stock units as of June 17, 2005. Benefits under this plan were frozen as of the date of the Boeing acquisition. There are no SERP annuity benefits presently payable to any of the NEOs. Mr. Pilla elected to convert his SERP benefit as of June 17, 2005, into 16,023 phantom stock units.

Also in connection with the Boeing acquisition, the Company adopted the PVP for certain eligible employees of Boeing, and allowed for the transfer of pension values from Boeing pension plans. The PVP is a frozen plan and no additional employees are becomingmay become participants in the PVP, and no current participants are accruing any additional benefits (other than interest credits). The PVP is fully paid for by the Company, and the Company’s employees are vested after reaching five years of service. Other than Mr. Pilla, none of the NEOs received benefits under the PVP or SERP in 20182019 or is eligible to participate in such plans. Mr. Pilla’s participation in the PVP is detailed under “Pension Benefits.” Mr. Pilla’s phantom stock units under the SERP are described under “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.”

Post-Termination Payments and Change-in-Control Compensation

 

The Company believes competitive severance protection is an appropriate incentive in attracting and retaining executive talent. The Company has provided for post-termination severance compensation through certain individual employment agreements and has also agreed to individual severance arrangements at the time of termination of employment, taking into account the specific facts and circumstances of termination. Certain of our employment agreements provide benefits upon a change-in-control.

Further, certain of the Company’s benefit plans provide for compensation upon termination or in connection with a change-in-control. Beginning in 2018, theThe ACI, long-term incentives, and Perquisite Allowance Plan are subject to a double trigger change-in-control provision.provisions.

You can find additional information regarding the Company’s practices in providing compensation in connection with termination of employment under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control.”

Accounting and Tax Treatment of Compensation

When evaluating the Company’s compensation programs, the Company takes into account the various accounting, tax, and disclosure rules associated with such matters, including Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and Section 409A of the Code. Section 162(m) generally imposes a $1 million limit on the amount that a public company may deduct for compensation paid to “covered employees” each year. The Compensation Committee generally seeks to award compensation that would allow it to preserve tax deductions; however, the Compensation Committee reserves the right to set compensation at the levels and in the manner (tax-deductible or not) that it determines to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    50


Back to Contents

Stock Ownership Requirements

 

The Company maintains stock ownership requirements for its NEOs and other senior executives to further promote alignment of management and stockholder interests. The ownership requirements (measured by the value of the Company’s stockCommon Stock required to be held) are based on a multiple of base salary tied to pay grade. The stock ownership requirementsposition, and establish the following target levels for Company stock ownership:

Officer Level

Target Level

(Multiple of Annual Base Salary)

Chief Executive Officer

5x

Executive Vice Presidents/Senior Vice Presidents

3x

Vice Presidents

1x

 

The stock ownership requirements mandate that the CEO and other senior officers accumulate their required positions within the later of: (i) five years after the adoption of the guidelines, or (ii) five years after being hired or promoted into the officer position. The Company believes that five years provides a reasonable goal for executives to accumulate shares through earned incentive awards.

During the five-year accumulation period, all NEOs are expected to continuously accumulate qualifying equity until they meet the minimumapplicable stock ownership guideline.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    48


Back to Contents

The Company reviews ownership positions on an annual basis. Based on the review conducted in 2018,2019, the Company determined that the NEOs own appropriate amounts of Company stock in light of the minimum stock ownership requirements and the portions of their respective accumulation periods that have passed. The Company may restrict any officer from liquidating any of his or her then-current holdings in Company stock, except for those shares that are sold to meet Company tax-withholding requirements. The Company may modify or waive the requirements of the guidelines at its discretion if it determines that compliance would result in severe hardship for an officer. Note that the Company’s insider trading policy prohibits Company employees from engaging in short sales of the Company’s securities, and entering into short-term trades involvinghedging and pledging the Company’s securities. Further, the Company’s insider tradingFor additional information on this policy, also prohibits employees from pledging the Company’s securities as collateral for a loan.

Accountingsee “Board and Tax Treatment of Compensation

When evaluating the Company’s compensation programs, the Company takes into account the various accounting, tax,Governance Matters - Policy Prohibiting Short Selling, Hedging, and disclosure rules associated with such matters, including Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and Section 409A of the Code. Section 162(m) generally imposes a $1 million limit on the amount that a public company may deduct for compensation paid to “covered employees” each year. The Compensation Committee generally seeks to award compensation that would allow it to preserve tax deductions; however, the Compensation Committee reserves the right to set compensation at the levels and in the manner (tax-deductible or not) that it determines to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.Pledging.”

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    4951


Back to Contents

Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the compensation of the NEOs for the last three fiscal years.

Name and

Principal Position

Year

Salary

($)

(4) 

Bonus

($)

(5) 

Stock

Awards

($)

(6) 

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)

(7) 

Change in

Pension Value

and

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

(8) 

All Other

Compensation

($)

(9) 

Total

($)

Thomas C. Gentile III

President and CEO(1)

2018

1,241,233

 

 

 

6,250,140

 

1,546,576

 

 

 

861,744

 

9,899,693

2017

1,144,223

 

 

 

5,175,087

 

2,578,703

 

 

 

1,009,385

 

9,907,398

2016

770,773

 

 

 

3,000,045

 

2,234,460

 

 

 

169,476

 

6,174,754

Sanjay Kapoor

EVP and CFO

2018

650,000

 

 

 

1,950,174

 

578,500

 

 

 

81,541

 

3,260,215

2017

650,000

 

 

 

1,820,067

 

1,046,500

 

 

 

39,148

 

3,555,715

2016

624,229

 

 

 

2,696,650

 

973,882

 

 

 

127,208

 

4,421,969

Samantha J. Marnick

EVP, CAO and Strategy

2018

522,877

 

 

 

1,040,241

 

491,504

 

 

 

149,309

 

2,203,930

2017

490,006

 

 

 

931,048

 

788,410

 

 

 

141,475

 

2,350,939

2016

460,465

 

 

 

1,405,583

 

719,204

 

 

 

213,332

 

2,798,584

Duane F. Hawkins

SVP; President, Defense and Fabrication Division(2)

2018

533,685

 

 

 

1,230,603

 

456,301

 

 

 

45,630

 

2,266,218

2017

517,691

 

 

 

1,144,036

 

831,827

 

 

 

33,657

 

2,527,211

2016

497,684

 

 

 

1,000,076

 

756,097

 

 

 

57,905

 

2,311,762

John A. Pilla

SVP, Chief Technology and Quality Officer(3)

2018

456,041

 

 

 

1,364,744

 

422,978

 

 

 

61,064

 

2,304,827

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

               
(1)

Mr. Gentile was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company effective April 1, 2016.

(2)

Mr. Hawkins served as the Company’s SVP and GM, Boeing, Defense, Regional/Jet Programs, and Global Customer Support until October 1, 2018. Effective October 1, 2018, Mr. Hawkins was given responsibility for defense and fabrication operations.

(3)

Mr. Pilla was not an NEO in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Accordingly, no information is displayed for those years.

(4)

For NEOs who received salary increases during the fiscal year, these numbers reflect a weighted amount based on the portions of the years for which their new compensation arrangements applied.

(5)

Because the Annual Cash Incentive (“ACI”) has mandatory performance measures that must be achieved for any payout, the ACI is shown in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the table.

(6)

Amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted to NEOs during the applicable year, as determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. These grant date fair values represent the accounting expense to be recorded for the award and are not reflective of the actual value that may be recognized by an NEO with respect to the award. In 2018, each NEO received a Time-Based Restricted Stock award (“RS”), a Performance-Based Restricted Stock award tied to TSR (“PB-TSR”), and a Performance-Based Restricted Stock award tied to FCF Percentage (“PB-FCF”). The assumptions made by the Company in calculating these amounts are incorporated herein by reference to Note 18 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2018. The grant date fair value of the RSs is equal to the number of shares granted multiplied by $89.32, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on February 7, 2018, the grant date. The grant date fair value of the PB-TSRs is equal to the number of shares granted at target multiplied by $112.55, which was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model based on the probable ranking of the Company’s TSR relative to the TSR of a group of the Company’s peers. If it is assumed that the maximum level of performance is achieved with respect to the PB-TSRs (and thus the maximum number of shares are awarded to the NEOs), using the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on the grant date, the value of the PB-TSRs would be as follows: Mr. Gentile: $1,984,154; Mr. Kapoor: $619,166; Ms. Marnick: $330,305; Mr. Hawkins: $390,686; and Mr. Pilla: $274,570. The grant date fair value of the PB-FCFs is equal to the number of shares granted at target multiplied by $89.18, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on the grant date, adjusted for dividends (as dividends do not accrue on PB-FCFs until vesting). If it is assumed that the maximum level of performance is achieved with respect to the PB-FCFs (and thus the maximum number of shares are awarded to the NEOs), using the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on the grant date, the value of the PB-FCFs would be as follows: Mr. Gentile: $2,503,997; Mr. Kapoor: $781,371; Ms. Marnick: $416,767; Mr. Hawkins: $493,046; and Mr. Pilla: $346,383. For additional information on the awards, see “2018 Compensation Program Elements.” In addition, Mr. Pilla’s amount includes the grant date fair value of an RS of 6,135 shares of Common Stock received on October 23, 2018. The same assumptions set forth above apply. The grant date fair value of this RS is equal to the number of shares granted multiplied by $81.51, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on October 23, 2018, the grant date.

Name and

Principal Position

Year

Salary

($)

(4) 

Bonus

($)

(5) 

Stock

Awards

($)

(6) 

Non-Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compensation

($)

(7) 

Change in

Pension Value

and Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

($)

(8)  

All Other

Compensation

($)

(9) 

Total

($)

Thomas C. Gentile III

President and CEO

2019

1,295,753

 

 

 

7,150,017

 

1,873,535

 

 

 

752,844

 

11,072,149

2018

1,241,233

 

 

 

6,250,140

 

1,546,576

 

 

 

861,744

 

9,899,693

2017

1,144,223

 

 

 

5,175,087

 

2,578,703

 

 

 

1,009,385

 

9,907,398

Jose I. Garcia(1)

Former SVP and CFO

2019

601,521

 

250,000

 

2,730,292

 

615,000

 

 

 

310,950

 

4,507,763

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sanjay Kapoor(2)

Former EVP and CFO

2019

16,027

 

 

 

1,104,960

 

 

 

 

 

856,152

 

1,977,140

2018

650,000

 

 

 

1,950,174

 

578,500

 

 

 

81,541

 

3,260,215

2017

650,000

 

 

 

1,820,067

 

1,046,500

 

 

 

39,148

 

3,555,715

Samantha J. Marnick

EVP, CAO and Strategy

2019

550,000

 

 

 

1,182,704

 

561,000

 

 

 

151,808

 

2,445,512

2018

522,877

 

 

 

1,040,241

 

491,504

 

 

 

149,309

 

2,203,930

2017

490,006

 

 

 

931,048

 

788,410

 

 

 

141,475

 

2,350,939

Duane F. Hawkins

SVP; President,
Defense and Fabrication Division

2019

535,000

 

 

 

1,230,696

 

536,338

 

 

 

38,440

 

2,340,474

2018

533,685

 

 

 

1,230,603

 

456,301

 

 

 

45,630

 

2,266,218

2017

517,691

 

 

 

1,144,036

 

831,827

 

 

 

33,657

 

2,527,211

John A. Pilla(3)

SVP, Chief Technology Officer

2019

475,000

 

 

 

902,629

 

478,563

 

96,295

 

46,766

 

1,999,253

2018

456,041

 

 

 

1,364,744

 

422,978

 

 

 

61,064

 

2,304,827

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Mr. Garcia joined the Company on January 9, 2019, and resigned on January 29, 2020.

(2)

Mr. Kapoor resigned as the Company’s EVP and CFO on January 9, 2019, but remained with the Company as Senior Financial Advisor until March 31, 2019, when he retired.

(3)

Mr. Pilla was not an NEO in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. Accordingly, no information is displayed for 2017.

(4)

For Mr. Gentile, this number reflects a weighted amount based on the portion of the year for which his new base salary applied. For Mr. Kapoor, the amount reflects amounts earned through January 9, 2019. Amounts paid to Mr. Kapoor after that date, including severance payments, are included in “All Other Compensation.”

(5)

Because the Annual Cash Incentive (“ACI”) has mandatory performance measures that must be achieved for any payout, the ACI is shown in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the table. Mr. Garcia’s amount represents a $250,000 cash sign-on bonus that he received in 2019.

(6)

Amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted to NEOs during the applicable year, as determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. These grant date fair values represent the accounting expense to be recorded for the award and are not reflective of the actual value that may be recognized by a NEO with respect to the award. The assumptions made by the Company in calculating these amounts are incorporated herein by reference to Note 19 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2019. In 2019, each NEO other than Mr. Kapoor received a Time-Based Restricted Stock award (“RS”), a Performance-Based Restricted Stock award tied to TSR (“PB-TSR”), and a Performance-Based Restricted Stock award tied to FCF Percentage (“PB-FCF”). In addition, the other awards were issued as follows: (i) Mr. Garcia received a sign-on time-based restricted stock award (“Initial Sign-On RS”) on February 6, 2019, (ii) Mr. Garcia received a one-time time-based restricted stock award (“One-Time RS”) on November 5, 2019, and (iii) Mr. Kapoor received a retirement time-based restricted stock award on April 1, 2019 (the “Retirement RS”). The grant date fair value of the RSs and Mr. Garcia's Sign-On RS is equal to the number of shares granted multiplied by $92.08, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on February 6, 2019, the grant date. The grant date fair value of Mr. Garcia's One-Time RS is equal to 5,880 shares multiplied by $85.045, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on November 5, 2019, the grant date. The grant date fair value of Mr. Kapoor's Retirement RS is equal to 12,000 shares multiplied by $92.08, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on April 1, 2019. The grant date fair value of the PB-TSRs is equal to the number of shares granted at target multiplied by $124.24, which was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model based on the probable ranking of the Company’s TSR relative to the TSR of a group of the Company’s peers. If the maximum level of performance is achieved with respect to the PB-TSRs, the value of the PB-TSRs would be as follows: Mr. Gentile: $2,860,005; Mr. Garcia: $492,239; Ms. Marnick: $473,106; Mr. Hawkins: $492,239; and Mr. Pilla: $361,042. The grant date fair value of the PB-FCFs is equal to the number of shares granted at target multiplied by $90.61, the closing price of Common Stock on the grant date, adjusted for dividends (as dividends do not accrue on PB-FCFs until vesting). If the maximum level of performance is achieved with respect to the PB-FCFs, the value of the PB-FCFs would be as follows: Mr. Gentile: $2,860,014; Mr. Garcia: $492,012; Ms. Marnick: $473,165; Mr. Hawkins: $492,375; and Mr. Pilla: $361,171. For additional information on the awards, see “2019 Compensation Program Elements.”

(7)

Represents ACIs earned by the NEOs with respect to 2019 performance.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    5052


Back to Contents

(7)

Represents ACIs earned by the NEOs.

(8)

With respect to change in pension value, no amount is shown forFor Mr. Pilla, as there was an aggregate decrease of $28,983amount shown reflects increase in the actuarial present value of Mr. Pilla’s accumulated benefits under the Pension Value PlanPVP during the year.2019. This amount was determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in our audited financial statements. For 2018, Mr. Pilla’s decreaseThe increase is due largely to the increasedecrease in the applicable discount rate from December 31, 2017,2018, to December 31, 2018.2019. Additional information regarding our Pension Value PlanPVP is set forth in “Pension Benefits.” With respect to nonqualified deferred compensation earnings, none of the NEOs received any earnings on their deferred compensation based on above-market or preferential rates.

(9)

The following table shows “All Other Compensation” amounts for our NEOs in 2018:2019:

Name

Life

Insurance

($)

(a) 

 

Financial

and Tax

Services

($)

(b) 

 

Personal

Aircraft

Usage

($)

(c) 

 

Personal

Travel

Expenses

($)

(d) 

 

Personal

Security

($)

(e) 

 

Relocation

Expenses

and

Gross-Ups

($)

(f) 

 

Deferred

Compensation

Plan

Contributions

($)

(g) 

 

Company

Contributions

Under Tax-

Qualified

Contribution

Plan

($)

(h) 

 

Other(i)

($)

 

Total

($)

Life

Insurance

($)

(a) 

 

Financial

and Tax

Services

($)

(b) 

 

Personal

Aircraft

Usage

($)

(c) 

 

Personal

Travel

Expenses

($)

(d) 

 

Personal

Security

($)

(e) 

 

Relocation

Expenses

and

Gross-Ups

($)

(f) 

 

Deferred

Compensation

Plan

Contributions

($)

(g) 

 

Company

Contributions

Under Tax-

Qualified

Contribution

Plan

($)

(h) 

 

Other(i)

($)

 

Total

($)

Thomas C. Gentile III

816

 

16,600

 

56,376

 

 

 

 

 

124,843

 

600,000

 

30,375

 

32,734

 

861,744

819

 

9,782

 

95,195

 

13,456

 

 

 

 

 

600,000

 

18,374

 

15,218

 

752,844

Jose I. Garcia

819

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

190,035

 

100,000

 

7,096

 

13,000

 

310,950

Sanjay Kapoor

816

 

 

 

32,257

 

13,000

 

1,091

 

 

 

 

 

33,375

 

1,002

 

81,541

819

 

 

 

27,978

 

12,190

 

1,208

 

 

 

 

 

18,900

 

795,057

 

856,152

Samantha J. Marnick

816

 

975

 

4,068

 

12,025

 

10,200

 

 

 

100,000

 

21,224

 

 

149,309

819

 

 

 

5,289

 

13,000

 

10,200

 

 

 

100,000

 

22,500

 

 

 

151,808

Duane F. Hawkins

816

 

13,000

 

4,068

 

 

 

1,091

 

 

 

 

 

26,654

 

 

 

45,630

756

 

13,000

 

3,753

 

 

 

1,208

 

 

 

 

 

19,723

 

 

 

38,440

John A. Pilla

743

 

 

 

 

 

9,463

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

47,322

 

3,537

 

61,064

775

 

 

 

 

 

6,382

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,250

 

3,359

 

46,766

(a)

Amounts shown reflect Company contributions toward group life insurance.

(b)

Amounts shown reflect financial, tax-preparation, and other related services paid for by the Company.

(c)

Amounts shown reflect the incremental cost to the Company of personal usage of its corporate aircraft. The incremental cost to the Company for personal aircraft usage is determined by dividing direct operating costs per aircraft by the total number of flight hours per aircraft, resulting in a cost per hour, and multiplying the cost per hour by the hours of personal usage. Direct operating costs include variable costs less revenue derived from charter flights. Variable costs include fuel, maintenance expenses, parts and supplies, landing fees, ground services, catering, and crew expenses associated with such use, including those associated with “deadhead” flights related to such use. Because corporate aircraft is used primarily for business travel, the methodology excludes fixed costs that do not change based on usage. Fixed costs include pilot salaries, the purchase or lease costs of the aircraft, and the cost of maintenance not related to personal travel. Executives, their families, and invited guests occasionally fly on the corporate aircraft as additional passengers on business flights. In those cases, the aggregate incremental cost to the Company is a de minimis amount, and as a result, no amount is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table. Executives, directors, their families, and invited guests also occasionally fly on the corporate aircraft as additional passengers on personal flights that are attributed to another executive, in which case the entire incremental cost is allocated to the executive who arranged for the personal flight. The Company does not grant bonuses to cover, reimburse, or “gross-up” any income tax owed for personal travel on corporate aircraft.

(d)

Amounts shown reflect the NEOs’ personal travel expenses (or travel expenses of their spouses) and personal commercial flights paid for by the Company.

(e)

Amounts shown reflect the incremental cost of personal or home security services for the NEOs that were deemed to be necessary and appropriate based on risk assessments performed by an independent security firm.

(f)

Amounts shown reflect relocation expenses reimbursed by the Company and associated tax gross-ups.

(g)

Amounts shown reflect Company contributions to the accounts of its eligible NEOs under the DCP. See “Other Compensation Elements and Information — Benefits and Perquisites.”

(h)

Amounts shown reflect matching and non-matching contributions made by the Company under the RSP. See “Other Compensation Elements and Information — Benefits and Perquisites.”

(i)

For Mr. Gentile, amounts shown reflect executive physical costs of $2,750, costs relating to personal use of country club memberships of $5,036, personal driving fees of $16,548, and $8,400 for the value of forfeited shares in connection with Mr. Gentile’s resignation from a private company’s board of directors (such value was claimed by Mr. Gentile through the Company’s Perquisite Allowance Plan). For Messrs. Kapoor and Pilla, amounts shown reflect costs relating to personal use of a country club membership.

(a)

Amounts shown reflect Company contributions toward group life insurance.

(b)

Amounts shown reflect financial, tax-preparation, and other related services paid for by the Company.

(c)

Amounts shown reflect the incremental cost to the Company of personal usage of its corporate aircraft. The incremental cost is determined by dividing direct operating costs per aircraft by the total number of flight hours per aircraft, resulting in a cost per hour, and multiplying the cost per hour by the hours of personal usage. Direct operating costs include variable costs less revenue derived from charter flights. Variable costs include fuel, maintenance expenses, parts and supplies, landing fees, ground services, catering, and crew expenses associated with such use, including those associated with “deadhead” flights related to such use. Because corporate aircraft is used primarily for business travel, the methodology excludes fixed costs that do not change based on usage. Fixed costs include pilot salaries, the purchase costs of the aircraft, and the cost of maintenance not related to personal travel. Executives, their families, and invited guests occasionally fly on the corporate aircraft as additional passengers on business flights. In those cases, the aggregate incremental cost to the Company is a de minimis amount, and as a result, no amount is reflected in “Summary Compensation Table.” Executives, directors, their families, and invited guests also occasionally fly on the corporate aircraft as additional passengers on personal flights that are attributed to another executive, in which case the entire incremental cost is allocated to the executive who arranged for the personal flight. The Company does not grant bonuses to cover, reimburse, or “gross-up” any income tax owed for personal travel on corporate aircraft. The Compensation Committee has authorized annual aircraft personal usage amounts of the following (such amounts do not include “deadhead” or ferry flights) (the “Approved Amounts”): Mr. Gentile - 70 hours; and Ms. Marnick - 25 hours. Of the Approved Amounts, in 2019, Mr. Gentile used 42.5 hours, and Ms. Marnick used 2.3 hours.

(d)

Amounts shown reflect the NEOs’ personal travel expenses, spousal travel expenses, and personal driving expenses paid for by the Company.

(e)

Amounts shown reflect the incremental cost of personal or home security services for the NEOs.

(f)

Amounts shown reflect relocation expenses reimbursed by the Company and associated tax gross-ups.

(g)

Amounts shown reflect Company contributions to the accounts of its eligible NEOs under the DCP. See “Other Compensation Elements and Information — Benefits and Perquisites.”

(h)

Amounts shown reflect matching and non-matching contributions made by the Company under the RSP. See “Other Compensation Elements and Information — Benefits and Perquisites.”

(i)

For Messrs. Gentile and Pilla, amounts shown reflect costs relating to personal use of country club memberships. For Mr. Garcia, the amount shown reflects car payments. For Mr. Kapoor, amount reflects the sum of (i) $144,247 in compensation earned as a senior advisor from January 10, 2019 through March 31, 2019; (ii) $489,726 in severance payments through December 31, 2019; (iii) $160,274 in a 2019 ACI payout as part of his retirement agreement; and (iv) $810 in legal fees.

(a)

Amounts shown reflect Company contributions toward group life insurance.

(b)

Amounts shown reflect financial, tax-preparation, and other related services paid for by the Company.

(c)

Amounts shown reflect the incremental cost to the Company of personal usage of its corporate aircraft. The incremental cost is determined by dividing direct operating costs per aircraft by the total number of flight hours per aircraft, resulting in a cost per hour, and multiplying the cost per hour by the hours of personal usage. Direct operating costs include variable costs less revenue derived from charter flights. Variable costs include fuel, maintenance expenses, parts and supplies, landing fees, ground services, catering, and crew expenses associated with such use, including those associated with “deadhead” flights related to such use. Because corporate aircraft is used primarily for business travel, the methodology excludes fixed costs that do not change based on usage. Fixed costs include pilot salaries, the purchase costs of the aircraft, and the cost of maintenance not related to personal travel. Executives, their families, and invited guests occasionally fly on the corporate aircraft as additional passengers on business flights. In those cases, the aggregate incremental cost to the Company is a de minimis amount, and as a result, no amount is reflected in “Summary Compensation Table.” Executives, directors, their families, and invited guests also occasionally fly on the corporate aircraft as additional passengers on personal flights that are attributed to another executive, in which case the entire incremental cost is allocated to the executive who arranged for the personal flight. The Company does not grant bonuses to cover, reimburse, or “gross-up” any income tax owed for personal travel on corporate aircraft. The Compensation Committee has authorized annual aircraft personal usage amounts of the following (such amounts do not include “deadhead” or ferry flights) (the “Approved Amounts”): Mr. Gentile - 70 hours; and Ms. Marnick - 25 hours. Of the Approved Amounts, in 2019, Mr. Gentile used 42.5 hours, and Ms. Marnick used 2.3 hours.

(d)

Amounts shown reflect the NEOs’ personal travel expenses, spousal travel expenses, and personal driving expenses paid for by the Company.

(e)

Amounts shown reflect the incremental cost of personal or home security services for the NEOs.

(f)

Amounts shown reflect relocation expenses reimbursed by the Company and associated tax gross-ups.

(g)

Amounts shown reflect Company contributions to the accounts of its eligible NEOs under the DCP. See “Other Compensation Elements and Information — Benefits and Perquisites.”

(h)

Amounts shown reflect matching and non-matching contributions made by the Company under the RSP. See “Other Compensation Elements and Information — Benefits and Perquisites.”

(i)

For Messrs. Gentile and Pilla, amounts shown reflect costs relating to personal use of country club memberships. For Mr. Garcia, the amount shown reflects car payments. For Mr. Kapoor, amount reflects the sum of (i) $144,247 in compensation earned as a senior advisor from January 10, 2019 through March 31, 2019; (ii) $489,726 in severance payments through December 31, 2019; (iii) $160,274 in a 2019 ACI payout as part of his retirement agreement; and (iv) $810 in legal fees.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    5153


Back to Contents

Employment and Separation Agreements

 

Spirit has employment agreements with all of its NEOs except for Mr. Pilla. A brief description of certainthe material terms is below. In addition, the material terms of the separation agreements of Messrs. Garcia and Gentile are included below.

Mr. Gentile’s Employment Agreement

On February 13, 2016, we entered into an employment agreement, effective April 1, 2016, with Mr. Gentile with respect to his position as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Gentile received a base salary of $1,000,000 per year, which could be changed based on performance.year. In addition, Mr. Gentile was eligible for an ACI equal to 140% of his base salary, and an annual target LTIP award equal to 300% of his base salary. Mr. Gentile was also entitled to participate in the executive relocation program and receive an annual DCP Company contribution of $600,000.

The Company granted Mr. Gentile a sign-on award of $3,000,000 in shares of restricted stock. Half of the award vested on April 1, 2017, and the other half vested on April 1, 2018.

Effective August 1, 2016 (in recognition of Mr. Gentile’s appointment as President and CEO), Mr. Gentile’s base salary was increased to $1,100,000 and his annual target LTIP award was increased to 400% of his annual base salary. EffectiveMr. Gentile received salary and LTIP target award increases in the first quarter of 2017 and 2018. Most recently, in February 3, 2017, Mr. Gentile’s base salary was increased to $1,150,000, and his annual target LTIP award was increased to 450% of his base salary. In January 2018, Mr. Gentile’s salary was increased to $1,250,000, and his annual target LTIP award was increased to 500%. In January 2019, Mr. Gentile’s salary was increased to $1,300,000, his annual target ACI award was increased to 145% of his annual base salary, and his annual target LTIP award was increased to 550% of his annual base salary.

Potential payments and termination events under Mr. Gentile’s employment agreement are described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control — Employment Agreements.”

Mr. Garcia’s Employment Agreement and Resignation Agreement

On November 23, 2018, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Garcia with respect to his position as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, effective January 9, 2019. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Garcia received a base salary of $615,000 per year. In addition, Mr. Garcia was eligible for an ACI award with a target value equal to 100% of his base salary, and an annual target LTIP award equal to 200% of his base salary. Mr. Garcia was also entitled to receive an annual DCP Company contribution of $100,000.

The Company granted Mr. Garcia a cash sign-on award of $750,000, of which $250,000 was paid in 2019, and $500,000 was paid in 2020. Mr. Garcia received a sign-on restricted stock award of $1,500,000. The first portion of this award, the Initial Sign-On RS, was granted on February 6, 2019, with a grant date fair value of $1,000,080, and the second award of $500,000 was to be granted no later than the first anniversary of the effective date (the “Subsequent Sign-On”). Each of the sign-on stock awards were to vest over three years.

On January 29, 2020, Mr. Garcia resigned. On January 31, 2020, the Company and Mr. Garcia entered into a Resignation Agreement and General Release (the “Garcia Agreement”). Under the terms of the Garcia Agreement, and in consideration of Mr. Garcia’s future cooperation, release of claims, and compliance with certain obligations, including confidentiality, non-competition, non-solicitation, and non-disparagement covenants, Mr. Garcia will receive separation payments comprised of the following:

a sum of $615,000, which is equal to one year of Mr. Garcia’s annual base salary applicable on the date of his resignation;

a payment of Mr. Garcia’s expected ACI award for 2019, based on an assumed score of 1.0;

a lump sum of $20,000 for COBRA coverage over a 12-month period;

full vesting with respect to 10,861 shares underlying the Initial Sign-On RS, 5,880 shares of the One-Time RS, and 66 2/3%, or 5,344 shares, of the 2019 RS;

a sum of $500,000 in lieu of the Subsequent Sign-On Award;

a sum of $409,590 in lieu of receiving any portion of the annual 2020 long-term incentives;

reimbursement of reasonable and documented career transition services through July 31, 2020; and

continued vesting (upon the contractual vesting date) with respect to 66 2/3%, or 3,131 shares (based on target performance), of the 2019 PB-TSR and PB-FCF, subject to the Company’s certification of the satisfaction of applicable performance criteria.

Given Mr. Garcia continued to be employed by the Company through December 31, 2019, potential payments and termination events under Mr. Garcia’s employment agreement are described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control — Employment Agreements.”

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    54


Back to Contents

Mr. Kapoor’s Employment Agreement and Retirement Agreement

On August 23, 2013, we entered into an employment agreement, effective September 23, 2013, with Mr. Kapoor with respect to his position as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. The agreement provided for a three-year initial term and would be automatically extended for successive one-year periods thereafter. Pursuant to the employment agreement,Initially, Mr. Kapoor was entitled to a base salary of $525,000, which could be changed based on performance. In addition, Mr. Kapoorand was eligible for an ACI equal to 100% of his base salary, an annual target LTIP award of 200% of his base salary, and, from time to time, a target discretionary bonus in the form of cash or equity of 10% of earned base salary. Mr. Kapoor was also entitled to participate in the executive relocation program.

The Company granted Mr. Kapoor $2,000,000 in restricted stock as a sign-on award, which fully vested in 2017. In addition, Mr. Kapoor received a cash signing bonus of $150,000 to be paid within 30 days of the effective date, and an additional cash signing bonus of $100,000 to be paid on the first pay period following the first anniversary of the effective date.

Effective January 30, 2015, Mr. Kapoor’s base salary was increased to $565,000. Effective February 5, 2016, Mr. Kapoor’s base salary was increased to $600,000, and his annual target LTIP award was increased to 220% of his base salary. In May 2016, the Board increased Mr. Kapoor’s base salary to $650,000 and his annual target LTIP award to 280% of his base salary. On July 26, 2016, Mr. Kapoor’s title was changed to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. In

Mr. Kapoor received salary increases in 2015 and 2016. Most recently, in May 2016, the Board increased Mr. Kapoor’s base salary to $650,000 and in January 2018, Mr. Kapoor’s annualLTIP target LTIP award was increased to 300% of his base salary.

Potential paymentsOn November 20, 2018, the Company entered into a Retirement Agreement and termination events underGeneral Release (the “Retirement Agreement”) with Mr. Kapoor’s employment agreement are described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control — Employment Agreements.”Kapoor. Pursuant to the Retirement Agreement, Mr. Kapoor retiredresigned from the position of ExecutiveSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on January 9, 2019.2019 and, thereafter, served as Senior Financial Advisor until March 31, 2019 (the “Retirement Date”). For one year following the Retirement Date, Mr. Kapoor was to provide consulting services to the Company (the “Consulting Term”).

Under the terms of the Retirement Agreement and in consideration of Mr. Kapoor’s cooperation in the transition and provision of consulting services, release of claims, and compliance with certain obligations, including confidentiality, non-competition, non-solicitation, and non-disparagement covenants, Mr. Kapoor received separation payments comprised of the following:

12,000 shares of restricted stock vesting in 12 equal monthly installments over the Consulting Term;

a sum of $650,000, which is equal to one year of Mr. Kapoor’s annual base salary, paid in 12 equal monthly installments over the Consulting Term;

a payment based on actual achievement of 2018 performance under the ACI;

a prorata payment of his target 2019 ACI award under the OIP for the portion of the 2019 plan year prior to the Retirement Date;

a sum of $250,000 to cover Mr. Kapoor’s relocation expenses; and

COBRA coverage through the first anniversary of the Retirement Date.

In addition, until his Retirement Date, Mr. Kapoor continued to receive his base salary then in effect and vest as an active employee in his outstanding awards under the LTIP in accordance with their terms, including, in the case of performance-based grants, the satisfaction of applicable performance criteria. Following the Retirement Date, Mr. Kapoor was entitled to receive his account balance and accrued benefit, as applicable, under the Company’s RSP in accordance with the terms thereof.

Other Employment Agreements

Both Ms. Marnick and Mr. Hawkins have employment agreements with the Company. However, both of their roles have changed significantly since the employment agreements were entered into, and all termination benefits expressly provided by the agreements have expired. Accordingly, the Company does not believe a description of the terms of such agreements is necessary to understand the information disclosed in the “Summary Compensation Table.”

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    5255


Back to Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20182019

The following table presents information regarding grants of plan-based awards to the NEOs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2019. For more information on the terms applicable to the awards reflected below, please see “2018“2019 Compensation Program Elements.”

 

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards

 

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive Plan

Awards

 

All Other Stock

Awards

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards

 

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive Plan

Awards

 

All Other Stock

Awards

Name

Grant Date

Date

Award

Approved

by Board

Threshold

($)

Target

($)

Maximum

($)

 

Threshold

(#)

Target

(#)

Maximum

(#)

 

Number

of Shares

of Stock

(#)

Grant Date

Fair Value

of Stock

Awards

($)

Grant Date

Date

Award

Approved

by Board

Threshold

($)

Target

($)

Maximum

($)

 

Threshold

(#)

Target

(#)

Maximum

(#)

 

Number

of Shares

of Stock

(#)

Grant Date

Fair Value

of Stock

Awards

($)

Thomas C. Gentile III

Thomas C. Gentile III

Thomas C. Gentile III

ACI(1)

 

434,432

1,737,726

3,475,452

 

 

 

468,384

1,873,535

3,747,070

 

 

 

 

 

 

RS(2)

2/7/2018

1/23/2018

 

41,984

3,750,011

2/6/2019

1/23/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46,590

4,290,007

PB-TSR(3)

2/7/2018

1/23/2018

 

2,777

11,107

22,214

 

1,250,093

2/6/2019

1/23/2019

 

 

 

 

2,878

11,510

23,020

 

 

1,430,002

PB-FCF(4)

2/7/2018

1/23/2018

 

3,505

14,017

28,034

 

1,250,036

2/6/2019

1/23/2019

 

 

 

 

3,946

15,782

31,564

 

 

1,430,007

Sanjay Kapoor

 

Jose I. Garcia

Jose I. Garcia

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACI(1)

 

162,500

650,000

1,300,000

 

 

 

153,750

615,000

1,230,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sign-On(5)

2/6/2019

11/20/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,861

1,000,081

RS(2)

2/7/2018

1/23/2018

 

13,099

1,170,003

2/6/2019

1/23/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,015

738,021

RS(6)

11/5/2019

10/22/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,880

500,065

PB-TSR(3)

2/7/2018

1/23/2018

 

867

3,466

6,932

 

390,098

2/6/2019

1/23/2019

 

 

 

 

496

1,981

3,962

 

 

246,119

PB-FCF(4)

2/7/2018

1/23/2018

 

1,094

4,374

8,748

 

390,073

2/6/2019

1/23/2019

 

 

 

 

679

2,715

5,430

 

 

246,006

Sanjay Kapoor

Sanjay Kapoor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retirement(7)

4/1/2019

11/20/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,000

1,104,960

Samantha J. Marnick

Samantha J. Marnick

 

Samantha J. Marnick

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACI(1)

 

130,719

522,877

1,045,753

 

 

 

137,500

550,000

1,100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

RS(2)

2/7/2018

1/23/2018

 

6,987

624,079

2/6/2019

1/23/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,706

709,568

PB-TSR(3)

2/7/2018

1/23/2018

 

463

1,849

3,698

 

208,105

2/6/2019

1/23/2019

 

 

 

 

476

1,904

3,808

 

 

236,553

PB-FCF(4)

2/7/2018

1/23/2018

 

584

2,333

4,666

 

208,057

2/6/2019

1/23/2019

 

 

 

 

653

2,611

5,222

 

 

236,583

Duane F. Hawkins

Duane F. Hawkins

 

Duane F. Hawkins

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACI(1)

 

133,421

533,685

1,067,370

 

 

 

133,750

535,000

1,070,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

RS(2)

2/7/2018

1/23/2018

 

8,266

738,319

2/6/2019

1/23/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,019

738,390

PB-TSR(3)

2/7/2018

1/23/2018

 

547

2,187

4,374

 

246,147

2/6/2019

1/23/2019

 

 

 

 

496

1,981

3,962

 

 

246,119

PB-FCF(4)

2/7/2018

1/23/2018

 

690

2,760

5,520

 

246,137

2/6/2019

1/23/2019

 

 

 

 

680

2,717

5,434

 

 

246,187

John A. Pilla

John A. Pilla

 

John A. Pilla

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACI(1)

 

114,010

456,041

912,083

 

 

 

118,750

475,000

950,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

RS(2)

2/7/2018

1/23/2018

 

5,808

518,771

2/6/2019

1/23/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,881

541,522

PB-TSR(3)

2/7/2018

1/23/2018

 

385

1,537

3,074

 

172,989

2/6/2019

1/23/2019

 

 

 

 

364

1,453

2,906

 

 

180,521

PB-FCF(4)

2/7/2018

1/23/2018

 

485

1,939

3,878

 

172,920

2/6/2019

1/23/2019

 

 

 

 

499

1,993

3,986

 

 

180,586

RS(5)

10/23/2018

 

6,135

500,064

(1)

Represents ACIs that were paid in February 2019 but granted and earned in 2018. The actual ACI amounts are reported in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.” The threshold, target, and maximum figures were calculated on a weighted-average basis, giving effect to any changes made to the applicable NEO’s base salary or ACI target during 2018.

(2)

Represents RSs that vest annually over three years, beginning February 7, 2019, if such NEO remains employed by the Company on each annual vesting date. The grant date fair value of the award, which is reported in the “Stock Awards” column of the “Summary Compensation Table,” is equal to the number of shares multiplied by $89.32, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on the grant date.

(3)

Represents PB-TSRs that vest at the end of the three-year performance period based on the ranking of the Company’s TSR relative to the TSR of each of the companies in the Company’s peer group. The grant date fair value of the award, which is reported in the “Stock Awards” column of the “Summary Compensation Table,” is equal to the number of shares granted at target multiplied by $112.55, which was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation based on the probable ranking of the Company’s TSR relative to a group of the Company’s peers. Actual payout may be zero or range from 25% to 200% of the target shares granted.

(4)

Represents PB-FCFs that vest at the end of the three-year performance period based upon the achievement of a certain percentage of free cash flow as a percentage of revenue on a cumulative basis over the period. The grant date fair value of the award, which is reported in the “Stock Awards” column of the “Summary Compensation Table,” is equal to the number of shares granted at target multiplied by $89.18, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on the grant date, adjusted for dividends. Actual payout may be zero or range from 25% to 200% of the target shares granted.

(5)

Represents a one-time RS that vests annually over three years, beginning October 23, 2019, if Mr. Pilla remains employed by the Company on each annual vesting date. The grant date fair value of the award, which is reported in the “Stock Awards” column of the “Summary Compensation Table,” is equal to the number of shares multiplied by $81.51, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on the grant date.

(1)

Represents ACIs that were paid in February 2020 but granted and earned in 2019. The actual ACI amounts are reported in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.” For Mr. Gentile, the threshold, target, and maximum figures were calculated on a weighted-average basis, giving effect to the change made to his base salary and ACI target during 2019.

(2)

Represents RSs that vest annually over three years, beginning February 6, 2020, if such NEO remains employed by the Company on each annual vesting date. The grant date fair value of the award, which is reported in the “Stock Awards” column of the “Summary Compensation Table,” is equal to the number of shares multiplied by $92.08, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on the grant date. For information on the effect of Mr. Garcia’s resignation on such award, see “Employment and Separation Agreements.”

(3)

Represents PB-TSRs that vest at the end of the three-year performance period based on the ranking of the Company’s TSR relative to the TSR of each of the companies in the Company’s peer group. The grant date fair value of the award, which is reported in the “Stock Awards” column of the “Summary Compensation Table,” is equal to the number of shares granted at target multiplied by $124.24, which was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation based on the probable ranking of the Company’s TSR relative to a group of the Company’s peers. Actual payout may be zero or range from 25% to 200% of the target shares granted. For information on the effect of Mr. Garcia’s resignation on such award, see “Employment and Separation Agreements.”

(1)

Represents ACIs that were paid in February 2020 but granted and earned in 2019. The actual ACI amounts are reported in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.” For Mr. Gentile, the threshold, target, and maximum figures were calculated on a weighted-average basis, giving effect to the change made to his base salary and ACI target during 2019.

(2)

Represents RSs that vest annually over three years, beginning February 6, 2020, if such NEO remains employed by the Company on each annual vesting date. The grant date fair value of the award, which is reported in the “Stock Awards” column of the “Summary Compensation Table,” is equal to the number of shares multiplied by $92.08, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on the grant date. For information on the effect of Mr. Garcia’s resignation on such award, see “Employment and Separation Agreements.”

(3)

Represents PB-TSRs that vest at the end of the three-year performance period based on the ranking of the Company’s TSR relative to the TSR of each of the companies in the Company’s peer group. The grant date fair value of the award, which is reported in the “Stock Awards” column of the “Summary Compensation Table,” is equal to the number of shares granted at target multiplied by $124.24, which was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation based on the probable ranking of the Company’s TSR relative to a group of the Company’s peers. Actual payout may be zero or range from 25% to 200% of the target shares granted. For information on the effect of Mr. Garcia’s resignation on such award, see “Employment and Separation Agreements.”

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    5356


Back to Contents

(4)

Represents PB-FCFs that vest at the end of the three-year performance period based upon the achievement of a certain percentage of free cash flow as a percentage of revenue on a cumulative basis over the period. The grant date fair value of the award, which is reported in the “Stock Awards” column of the “Summary Compensation Table,” is equal to the number of shares granted at target multiplied by $90.61, the closing price of Common Stock on the grant date, adjusted for dividends. Actual payout may be zero or range from 25% to 200% of the target shares granted.

(5)

Represents a sign-on award that vests annually over three years beginning on February 6, 2020. For information on the effect of Mr. Garcia’s resignation on such award, see “Employment and Separation Agreements.”

(6)

Represents a one-time RS that vests annually over three years, beginning November 5, 2020. The grant date fair value of the award, which is reported in the “Stock Awards” column of the “Summary Compensation Table,” is equal to the number of shares multiplied by $85.045, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on the grant date. For information on the effect of Mr. Garcia’s resignation on such award, see “Employment and Separation Agreements.”

(7)

Represents a retirement award that vests in 12 monthly installments between April 1, 2019 and March 31, 2020. The grant date fair value of the award, which is reported in the “Stock Awards” column of the “Summary Compensation Table,” is equal to the number of shares multiplied by $92.08, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on the grant date.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    57


Back to Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20182019 Fiscal Year End

The following table presents the outstanding equity awards held by the NEOs as of December 31, 2018.2019. The Company has not granted any options or option-like awards. The market value of the awards is determined by multiplying the number of shares shown in the applicable columns below by $72.09,$72.88, the closing price of Common Stock on December 31, 2018.2019.

Name

Stock Awards

Stock Awards

Grant Date

Number of

Shares or

Units of Stock

That Have

Not Vested

(#)

Market Value of

Shares or Units of

Stock That Have

Not Vested

($)

 

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Number of

Unearned Shares, Units,

or Other Rights That

Have Not Vested

(#)

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Market or Payout

Value of Unearned Shares,

Units, or Other Rights That

Have Not Vested

($)

Grant Date

Number of

Shares or

Units of Stock

That Have

Not Vested

(#)

Market Value of

Shares or Units

of Stock That

Have Not Vested

($)

 

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Number of

Unearned Shares, Units,

or Other Rights That

Have Not Vested

(#)

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Market or Payout

Value of Unearned Shares,

Units, or Other Rights That

Have Not Vested

($)

Thomas C. Gentile III

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RS(1)

2/7/2018

41,984

3,026,627

 

2/6/2019

46,590

3,395,479

 

 

 

PB-TSR(2)

2/7/2018

 

22,214

1,601,407

2/6/2019

 

 

 

2,878

209,749

PB-FCF(3)

2/7/2018

 

3,505

252,675

2/6/2019

 

 

 

31,564

2,300,384

RS(4)

2/7/2017

36,915

2,661,202

 

2/7/2018

27,989

2,039,838

 

 

 

PB-TSR(5)

2/7/2017

 

37,264

2,686,362

2/7/2018

 

 

 

2,777

202,388

PB-FCF(6)

2/7/2017

 

4,709

339,472

2/7/2018

 

 

 

28,034

2,043,118

Sanjay Kapoor

 

RS(7)

2/7/2017

18,457

1,345,146

 

 

 

PB-TSR(8)

2/7/2017

22,358

1,629,451

 

 

 

PB-FCF(9)

2/7/2017

37,672

2,745,535

 

 

 

Jose I. Garcia

 

 

 

 

 

 

RS(1)

2/7/2018

13,099

944,307

 

2/6/2019

8,015

584,133

 

 

 

PB-TSR(2)

2/7/2018

 

6,932

499,728

2/6/2019

 

 

 

496

36,148

PB-FCF(3)

2/7/2018

 

1,094

78,866

2/6/2019

 

 

 

5,430

395,739

RS(4)

2/7/2017

12,982

935,872

 

PB-TSR(5)

2/7/2017

 

13,106

944,812

PB-FCF(6)

2/7/2017

 

1,657

119,453

RS(7)

2/9/2016

7,607

548,389

 

PB-TSR(8)

2/9/2016

6,076

438,018

 

RS(10)

11/5/2019

5,880

428,534

 

 

 

Sign-on(11)

2/6/2019

10,861

791,550

 

 

 

Sanjay Kapoor

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retirement(12)

4/1/2019

3,000

218,640

 

 

 

Samantha J. Marnick

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RS(1)

2/7/2018

6,987

503,693

 

2/6/2019

7,706

561,613

 

 

 

PB-TSR(2)

2/7/2018

 

3,698

266,589

2/6/2019

 

 

 

476

34,691

PB-FCF(3)

2/7/2018

 

584

42,101

2/6/2019

 

 

 

5,222

380,579

RS(4)

2/7/2017

6,641

478,750

 

2/7/2018

4,658

339,475

 

 

 

PB-TSR(5)

2/7/2017

 

6,704

483,291

2/7/2018

 

 

 

463

33,743

PB-FCF(6)

2/7/2017

 

848

61,132

2/7/2018

 

 

 

4,666

340,058

RS(7)

2/9/2016

3,965

285,837

 

2/7/2017

3,320

241,962

 

 

 

PB-TSR(8)

2/9/2016

3,167

228,309

 

2/7/2017

4,022

293,123

 

 

 

PB-FCF(9)

2/7/2017

6,778

493,981

 

 

 

Duane F. Hawkins

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RS(1)

2/7/2018

8,266

595,896

 

2/6/2019

8,019

584,425

 

 

 

PB-TSR(2)

2/7/2018

 

4,374

315,322

2/6/2019

 

 

 

496

36,148

PB-FCF(3)

2/7/2018

 

690

49,742

2/6/2019

 

 

 

5,434

396,030

RS(4)

2/7/2017

8,160

588,254

 

2/7/2018

5,510

401,569

 

 

 

PB-TSR(5)

2/7/2017

 

8,238

593,877

2/7/2018

 

 

 

547

39,865

PB-FCF(6)

2/7/2017

 

1,041

75,046

2/7/2018

 

 

 

5,520

402,298

RS(7)

2/9/2016

5,764

415,527

 

2/7/2017

4,079

297,278

 

 

 

PB-TSR(8)

2/9/2016

4,603

331,830

 

2/7/2017

4,943

360,246

 

 

 

PB-FCF(9)

2/7/2017

8,328

606,945

 

 

 

John A. Pilla

 

 

 

 

 

 

RS(1)

2/6/2019

5,881

428,607

 

 

 

PB-TSR(2)

2/6/2019

 

 

 

364

26,528

PB-FCF(3)

2/6/2019

 

 

 

3,986

290,500

RS(13)

10/23/2018

4,090

298,079

 

 

 

RS(4)

2/7/2018

3,872

282,191

 

 

 

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    5458


Back to Contents

Name

Stock Awards

Grant Date

Number of

Shares or

Units of Stock

That Have

Not Vested

(#)

Market Value of

Shares or Units of

Stock That Have

Not Vested

($)

 

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Number of

Unearned Shares, Units,

or Other Rights That

Have Not Vested

(#)

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Market or Payout

Value of Unearned Shares,

Units, or Other Rights That

Have Not Vested

($)

John A. Pilla

 

 

 

 

 

 

RS(9)

10/23/2018

6,135

442,272

 

 

 

RS(1)

2/7/2018

5,808

418,699

 

 

 

PB-TSR(2)

2/7/2018

 

 

 

3,074

221,607

PB-FCF(3)

2/7/2018

 

 

 

485

34,964

RS(4)

2/7/2017

5,489

395,702

 

 

PB-TSR(5)

2/7/2017

 

 

 

5,542

399,523

PB-FCF(6)

2/7/2017

 

 

 

701

50,535

RS(7)

2/9/2016

4,434

319,647

 

 

 

PB-TSR(8)

2/9/2016

3,542

255,343

 

 

 

(1)

Represents 2018 annual RSs. The first tranche of the award vested on February 7, 2019, and the second and third tranches will vest on February 7, 2020, and February 7, 2021, respectively, if the NEO continues to be employed by the Company on each vesting date.

(2)

Represents PB-TSRs granted in 2018 with a performance tracking period running from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020. PB-TSRs are earned and paid out in shares of Common Stock at the end of the three-year tracking period based upon the ranking of the Company’s TSR relative to the TSR of a group of the Company’s peers over such period. The number of shares and market value shown is based upon the achievement of a maximum performance goal based on the Company’s achievement of the target performance goal with respect to the PB-TSRs that were granted in 2016 and vested in 2019. The award vesting date is December 31, 2020, subject to performance certification by the Compensation Committee.

(3)

Represents PB-FCFs granted in 2018 with a performance tracking period running from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020. PB-FCFs are earned and paid out in shares of Common Stock at the end of the three-year tracking period based upon the achievement of the Company’s goals relating to free cash flow as a percentage of revenue. The number of shares and market value shown is based upon the achievement of a threshold performance goal. The award vesting date is December 31, 2020, subject to performance certification by the Compensation Committee.

(4)

Represents 2017 annual RSs. The first tranche of the award vested on February 7, 2018, the second tranche of the award vested on February 7, 2019, and the third tranche will vest on February 7, 2020, if the NEO continues to be employed by the Company on such vesting date.

(5)

Represents PB-TSRs granted in 2017 with a performance tracking period running from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. PB-TSRs are earned and paid out in shares of Common Stock at the end of the three-year tracking period based upon the ranking of the Company’s TSR relative to the TSR of a group of the Company’s peers over such period. The number of shares and market value shown is based upon the achievement of a maximum performance goal based on the Company’s achievement of the target performance goal with respect to the PB-TSRs that were granted in 2016 and vested in 2019. The award vesting date is February 7, 2020.

(6)

Represents PB-FCFs granted in 2017 with a performance tracking period running from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. PB-FCFs are earned and paid out in shares of Common Stock at the end of the three-year tracking period based upon the achievement of the Company’s goals relating to free cash flow as a percentage of revenue. The number of shares and market value shown is based upon the achievement of a threshold performance goal. The award vesting date is February 7, 2020.

(7)

Represents 2016 annual RSs. The first tranche of the award vested on February 9, 2017, the second tranche of the award vested on February 9, 2018, and the third tranche of the award vested on February 9, 2019.

(8)

Represents PB-TSRs granted in 2016 with a performance tracking period running from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018. PB-TSRs are earned and paid out in shares of Common Stock at the end of the three-year tracking period based upon the ranking of the Company’s TSR relative to the TSR of a group of the Company’s peers over such period. The number of shares and market value shown is based upon actual award performance through December 31, 2018, at 100% (percentile rank of 50th), as certified by the Compensation Committee on January 23, 2019. The award vested on February 9, 2019.

(9)

Represents a one-time RS that vests annually over three years, beginning October 23, 2019, if Mr. Pilla remains employed by the Company on each annual vesting date.

Name

Stock Awards

Grant Date

Number of

Shares or

Units of Stock

That Have

Not Vested

(#)

Market Value of

Shares or Units

of Stock That

Have Not Vested

($)

 

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Number of

Unearned Shares, Units,

or Other Rights That

Have Not Vested

(#)

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Market or Payout

Value of Unearned Shares,

Units, or Other Rights That

Have Not Vested

($)

PB-TSR(5)

2/7/2018

 

 

 

385

28,059

PB-FCF(6)

2/7/2018

 

 

 

3,878

282,629

RS(7)

2/7/2017

2,744

199,983

 

 

 

PB-TSR(8)

2/7/2017

3,325

242,326

 

 

 

PB-FCF(9)

2/7/2017

5,602

408,274

 

 

 

(1)

Represents 2019 annual RSs. The first tranche of the award vested on February 6, 2020, and the second and third tranches will vest on February 6, 2021, and February 6, 2022, respectively, if the NEO continues to be employed by the Company on each vesting date. For information on the effect of Mr. Garcia’s resignation on such award, see “Employment and Separation Agreements.”

(2)

Represents PB-TSRs granted in 2019 with a performance tracking period running from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021. The number of shares and market value shown reflects the achievement of a threshold performance goal based on the Company’s 2019 TSR performance. The award vesting date is December 31, 2021, subject to performance certification by the Compensation Committee. For information on the effect of Mr. Garcia’s resignation on such award, see “Employment and Separation Agreements.”

(3)

Represents PB-FCFs granted in 2019 with a performance tracking period running from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021. The number of shares and market value shown reflects the achievement of a maximum performance goal based on the Company’s free cash flow as a percentage of revenue performance in 2019. The award vesting date is December 31, 2021, subject to performance certification by the Compensation Committee. For information on the effect of Mr. Garcia’s resignation on such award, see “Employment and Separation Agreements.”

(4)

Represents 2018 annual RSs. The first tranche of the award vested on February 7, 2019, the second tranche vested on February 7, 2020, and the third tranche will vest on February 7, 2021, if the NEO continues to be employed by the Company on such date.

(5)

Represents PB-TSRs granted in 2018 with a performance tracking period running from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020. The number of shares and market value shown reflects the achievement of a threshold performance goal based on the Company’s 2019 TSR performance. The award vesting date is December 31, 2020, subject to performance certification by the Compensation Committee.

(6)

Represents PB-FCFs granted in 2018 with a performance tracking period running from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020. The number of shares and market value shown reflects the achievement of a maximum performance goal based on the Company’s free cash flow as a percentage of revenue performance in 2019. The award vesting date is December 31, 2020, subject to performance certification by the Compensation Committee.

(7)

Represents 2017 annual RSs. The first tranche of the award vested on February 7, 2018, the second tranche of the award vested on February 7, 2019, and the third tranche of the award vested on February 7, 2020.

(8)

Represents PB-TSRs granted in 2017 with a performance tracking period running from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. The number of shares and market value shown reflects the actual award performance through December 31, 2019 at 120% (percentile of 58th), as certified by the Compensation Committee on January 21, 2020. The award vested on February 7, 2020.

(9)

Represents PB-FCFs granted in 2017 with a performance tracking period running from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. The number of shares and market value shown reflects actual award performance through December 31, 2019 at 200% (free cash flow as a percentage of revenue over the performance period was 7.82%), as certified by the Compensation Committee on January 21, 2020. The award vested on February 7, 2020.

(10)

Represents a one-time RS that vests annually over three years, beginning November 5, 2020. For information on the effect of Mr. Garcia’s resignation on such award, see “Employment and Separation Agreements.”

(11)

Represents a sign-on award that vests annually over three years beginning on February 6, 2020. For information on the effect of Mr. Garcia’s resignation on such award, see “Employment and Separation Agreements.”

(12)

Represents a retirement restricted stock award granted on April 1, 2019 vesting in equal tranches over a 12-month period.

(13)

Represents a one-time RS that vests annually over three years. The first tranche of the award vested on October 23, 2019, the second tranche vested on October 23, 2020, and the third tranche will vest on October 23, 2021, if Mr. Pilla remains employed by the Company on such date.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    5559


Back to Contents

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year 20182019

The following table presents information regarding NEO stock awards that vested in 2018.2019. Values reflected below are gross amounts that do not include any reductions for tax withholding. Mr. Garcia is not included as he did not have any stock that vested in 2019. The Company has not granted any options or option-like awards.

Name

Grant Date

Vesting Date

Number of Shares

Acquired on Vesting

(#)

Value Realized on Vesting

($)

Grant Date

Vesting Date

Number of Shares

Acquired on Vesting

(#)

Value Realized on Vesting

($)

Thomas C. Gentile III

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sign-on(1)

4/1/2016

4/1/2018

32,666

2,918,054

RS(1)

2/7/2018

2/7/2019

13,995

1,296,147

RS(2)

2/7/2017

2/7/2018

18,458

1,657,344

2/7/2017

2/7/2019

18,458

1,709,488

TOTAL

 

 

51,124

4,575,398

 

 

32,453

3,005,635

Sanjay Kapoor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PB One-Time(3)

6/4/2016

6/4/2018

14,137

1,227,798

PB-TSR(4)

2/7/2015

2/7/2018

8,433

757,199

PB-TSR(3)

2/9/2016

2/9/2019

6,076

563,412

RS(1)

2/7/2018

2/7/2019

4,367

404,450

RS(2)

2/7/2017

2/7/2018

6,492

582,917

2/7/2017

2/7/2019

6,492

601,257

RS(5)

2/9/2016

2/9/2018

7,609

653,994

RS(4)

2/9/2016

2/9/2019

7,607

705,378

Retirement(5)

3/31/2019

Multiple

9,000

729,410

TOTAL

 

 

33,542

3,003,907

Samantha J. Marnick

 

 

 

PB-TSR(3)

2/9/2016

2/9/2019

3,167

293,668

RS(1)

2/7/2018

2/7/2019

2,329

215,700

RS(2)

2/7/2017

2/7/2019

3,321

307,574

RS(4)

2/9/2016

2/9/2019

3,965

367,665

TOTAL

 

 

12,782

1,184,607

Duane F. Hawkins

 

 

 

PB-TSR(3)

2/9/2016

2/9/2019

4,603

426,825

RS(1)

2/7/2018

2/7/2019

2,756

255,247

RS(2)

2/7/2017

2/7/2019

4,081

377,962

RS(4)

2/9/2016

2/9/2019

5,764

534,481

TOTAL

 

 

17,204

1,594,515

John A. Pilla

 

 

 

PB-TSR(3)

2/9/2016

2/9/2019

3,542

328,441

RS(1)

2/7/2018

2/7/2019

1,936

179,303

RS(2)

2/7/2017

2/7/2019

2,745

254,228

RS(4)

2/9/2016

2/9/2019

4,434

411,154

RS(6)

2/7/2015

2/7/2018

5,790

519,884

10/23/2018

10/23/2019

2,045

158,794

TOTAL

 

 

42,461

3,741,792

 

 

14,702

1,331,920

Samantha J. Marnick

 

 

 

 

PB One-Time(3)

6/4/2016

6/4/2018

7,369

639,998

PB-TSR(4)

2/7/2015

2/7/2018

4,478

402,080

RS(2)

2/7/2017

2/7/2018

3,321

298,193

RS(5)

2/9/2016

2/9/2018

3,966

340,878

RS(6)

2/7/2015

2/7/2018

3,074

276,014

TOTAL

 

 

22,208

1,957,162

Duane F. Hawkins

 

 

 

 

PB-TSR(4)

2/7/2015

2/7/2018

4,703

422,282

RS(2)

2/7/2017

2/7/2018

4,081

366,423

RS(5)

2/9/2016

2/9/2018

5,764

495,416

RS(6)

2/7/2015

2/7/2018

3,229

289,932

TOTAL

 

 

17,777

1,574,063

John A. Pilla

 

 

 

 

PB-TSR(4)

2/7/2015

2/7/2018

5,531

496,628

RS(2)

2/7/2017

2/7/2018

2,745

246,474

RS(5)

2/9/2016

2/9/2018

4,436

381,274

RS(6)

2/7/2015

2/7/2018

3,796

340,843

TOTAL

 

 

16,508

1,465,219

(1)

Represents shares received as a sign-on award under Mr. Gentile’s employment agreement. The value realized on vesting represents the number of shares multiplied by $83.99, the average of the high and low prices of Common Stock on March 29, 2018, the business day prior to the vesting date.

(2)

Represents shares vesting under the 2017 annual RS. The value realized on vesting represents the number of shares multiplied by $89.79, the average of the high and low prices of Common Stock on February 7, 2018, the vesting date.

(3)

Represents PB One-Time awards granted to each of Mr. Kapoor and Ms. Marnick in 2016. The value realized on vesting represents the number of shares multiplied by $86.85, the average of the high and low prices of Common Stock on June 4, 2018, the vesting date.

(4)

Represents shares under the 2015 PB-TSR with a performance tracking period from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017. Performance was certified by the Compensation Committee on January 23, 2018, at a percentile rank of 87th and a resulting payout of 192.5%. The value realized on vesting represents the number of shares multiplied by $89.79, the average of the high and low prices of Common Stock on February 7, 2018, the vesting date.

(5)

Represents shares vesting under the 2016 annual RS. The value realized on vesting represents the number of shares multiplied by $85.95, the average of the high and low prices of Common Stock on February 9, 2018, the vesting date.

(6)

Represents shares vesting under the 2015 annual RS. The value realized on vesting represents the number of shares multiplied by $89.79, the average of the high and low prices of Common Stock on February 7, 2018, the vesting date.

(1)

Represents shares vesting under the 2018 annual RS. The value realized on vesting represents the number of shares multiplied by $92.615, the average of the high and low prices of Common Stock on the vesting date.

(2)

Represents shares vesting under the 2017 annual RS. The value realized on vesting represents the number of shares multiplied by $92.615, the average of the high and low prices of Common Stock on the vesting date.

(3)

Represents shares under the 2016 PB-TSR with a performance tracking period from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018. Performance was certified by the Compensation Committee on January 23, 2019, at a percentile rank of 50th and a resulting payout of 100%. The value realized on vesting represents the number of shares multiplied by $92.7275, the average of the high and low prices of Common Stock on the vesting date.

(4)

Represents shares vesting under the 2016 annual RS. The value realized on vesting represents the number of shares multiplied by $92.7275, the average of the high and low prices of Common Stock on the vesting date.

(5)

Represents shares vesting under the Mr. Kapoor’s Retirement RS, which vests monthly between April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2020. In 2019, there were 9 vestings at the following dates and values: (i) April 30, 2019 at $86,580; (ii) May 31, 2019 at $81,025; (iii) June 28, 2019 at $80,475; (iv) July 31, 2019 at $77,090; (v) August 30, 2019 at $80,420; (vi) September 30, 2019 at $82,755; (vii) October 31, 2019 at $80,490; (viii) November 29, 2019 at $87,235; and (ix) December 31, 2019 at $73,340. Each value represents 1,000 shares multiplied by the average of the high and low prices of Common Stock on the vesting date.

(6)

Represents shares vesting under Mr. Pilla’s one-time RS. The value realized on vesting represents the number of shares multiplied by $77.65, the average of the high and low prices of Common Stock on the vesting date.

(1)

Represents shares vesting under the 2018 annual RS. The value realized on vesting represents the number of shares multiplied by $92.615, the average of the high and low prices of Common Stock on the vesting date.

(2)

Represents shares vesting under the 2017 annual RS. The value realized on vesting represents the number of shares multiplied by $92.615, the average of the high and low prices of Common Stock on the vesting date.

(3)

Represents shares under the 2016 PB-TSR with a performance tracking period from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018. Performance was certified by the Compensation Committee on January 23, 2019, at a percentile rank of 50th and a resulting payout of 100%. The value realized on vesting represents the number of shares multiplied by $92.7275, the average of the high and low prices of Common Stock on the vesting date.

(4)

Represents shares vesting under the 2016 annual RS. The value realized on vesting represents the number of shares multiplied by $92.7275, the average of the high and low prices of Common Stock on the vesting date.

(5)

Represents shares vesting under the Mr. Kapoor’s Retirement RS, which vests monthly between April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2020. In 2019, there were 9 vestings at the following dates and values: (i) April 30, 2019 at $86,580; (ii) May 31, 2019 at $81,025; (iii) June 28, 2019 at $80,475; (iv) July 31, 2019 at $77,090; (v) August 30, 2019 at $80,420; (vi) September 30, 2019 at $82,755; (vii) October 31, 2019 at $80,490; (viii) November 29, 2019 at $87,235; and (ix) December 31, 2019 at $73,340. Each value represents 1,000 shares multiplied by the average of the high and low prices of Common Stock on the vesting date.

(6)

Represents shares vesting under Mr. Pilla’s one-time RS. The value realized on vesting represents the number of shares multiplied by $77.65, the average of the high and low prices of Common Stock on the vesting date.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    5660


Back to Contents

Pension Benefits

The following table presents information concerning benefits received under the Company’s Pension Value Plan (the “PVP”)PVP by Mr. Pilla during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2019. No other NEOs received any benefits under the PVP.

Name

Plan Name

Number of Years of

Credited Service

(1) 

Present Value of

Accumulated Benefit

($)

(2) 

Plan Name

Number of Years of

Credited Service

(1) 

Present Value of

Accumulated Benefit

($)

(2) 

John A. Pilla

PVP

24.0875

 

703,267

 

PVP 

24.0875

 

799,562

 

(1)

Please note credited service was frozen in the PVP as of June 16, 2005. There is no policy that provides for granting extra years of credited service.

(2)

Present value was calculated based on the assumption that Mr. Pilla’s benefit commences at age 60. Key assumptions reflected in present value include a 4.21% discount rate, a cash balance interest crediting rate of 5.25%, and the life annuity form of payment. In order to determine changes in the present value reported in the Summary Compensation Table, the value was also calculated as of December 31, 2017. For values as of December 31, 2017, the discount rate was 3.59%. The present value was calculated assuming Mr. Pilla retires and commences receipt of benefits at age 60. The mortality assumption for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, is Mercer’s MILES-2010 generational mortality table for the Auto, Industrial Goods, and Transportation group with MMP-2016 improvement scale, and the mortality assumption for fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, is Mercer’s MILES-2010 generational mortality table for the Auto, Industrial Goods, and Transportation group with MMP-2018 improvement scale.

(1)

Please note credited service was frozen in the PVP as of June 16, 2005. There is no policy that provides for granting extra years of credited service.

(2)

Present value was calculated based on the assumption that Mr. Pilla’s benefit commences at age 60.5. Key assumptions reflected in present value include a 3.19% discount rate, a cash balance interest crediting rate of 5.25%, and the life annuity form of payment. In order to determine changes in the present value reported in the “Summary Compensation Table,” the value was also calculated as of December 31, 2018. For values as of December 31, 2018, the discount rate was 4.21%. The present value was calculated assuming Mr. Pilla retires and commences receipt of benefits at age 60. The mortality assumption for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, is Mercer’s MILES-2010 generational mortality table for the Auto, Industrial Goods, and Transportation group with the MMP-2018 improvement scale. The mortality assumption for fiscal year ending December 31, 2019, is Mercer’s MILES-2010 generational mortality table for the Auto, Industrial Goods, and Transportation group with the MMP-2019 improvement scale.

(1)

Please note credited service was frozen in the PVP as of June 16, 2005. There is no policy that provides for granting extra years of credited service.

(2)

Present value was calculated based on the assumption that Mr. Pilla’s benefit commences at age 60.5. Key assumptions reflected in present value include a 3.19% discount rate, a cash balance interest crediting rate of 5.25%, and the life annuity form of payment. In order to determine changes in the present value reported in the “Summary Compensation Table,” the value was also calculated as of December 31, 2018. For values as of December 31, 2018, the discount rate was 4.21%. The present value was calculated assuming Mr. Pilla retires and commences receipt of benefits at age 60. The mortality assumption for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, is Mercer’s MILES-2010 generational mortality table for the Auto, Industrial Goods, and Transportation group with the MMP-2018 improvement scale. The mortality assumption for fiscal year ending December 31, 2019, is Mercer’s MILES-2010 generational mortality table for the Auto, Industrial Goods, and Transportation group with the MMP-2019 improvement scale.

A significant portion of Spirit’s operations related to Boeing aerostructures was owned and controlled by Boeing until 2005. Boeing’s pension assets and liabilities were spun-off from Boeing’s qualified plans (each, a “Prior Plan”) into Spirit qualified plans for certain eligible Boeing employees who joined the Company. Credited service and benefit amounts under the Prior Plans were frozen as of June 16, 2005. Effective December 31, 2005, all Prior Plans were merged together into the PVP. The PVP is a frozen plan, so no additional employees are becomingmay become participants in the PVP, and no current participants are accruing any additional benefits (except for the interest credits described below). The PVP is fully paid for by the Company, and the Company’s employees are vested after reaching five years of service.

Mr. Pilla is the only NEO who participates in the PVP. Mr. Pilla is fully vested in his benefits. Benefits under the PVP for Mr. Pilla are based upon heritage benefits transferred into the Prior Plan and a cash balance benefit. Heritage benefits were indexed (increased) for base pay increases from the date the heritage benefit transferred to the Prior Plan until June 16, 2005. Under the cash balance benefit formula, employees received benefit credits based on their age at the end of each plan year through June 16, 2005. The annual benefit credit was a specified percentage of eligible pay, ranging from 3% at ages younger than 30 to 11% upon reaching age 50. Eligible pay included base pay and executive incentive pay, limited to Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limits. The benefit credits ceased upon freezing the Prior Plan; however, employees continue to receive interest credits each year. Interest credits are calculated by applying simple interest to the Prior Plan balance at the beginning of the year and are accrued until the pension benefit begins. Interest credits are based on the 30-year Treasury Rate as of November of the prior year, with a minimum of 5.25% and a maximum of 10%.

The PVP benefits are payable as a life annuity (other annuity options are also available). To determine a participant’s pension benefit, the participant’s accumulated benefits are divided by 11 and further divided by a factor of 12 to produce a monthly benefit.

The normal retirement age under the PVP is age 65. Participants who have at least ten10 years of service and are at least age 55, or at least one year of service and are at least age 62, are eligible for early retirement. Mr. Pilla is currently 5960.5 years of age and is eligible for early retirement. A portion of the Prior Plan benefit is reduced by 2% for each year that benefits commence prior to age 60. Projected annual benefits payable upon retirement at age 60as of December 31, 2019 are $47,154$47,533 for Mr. Pilla. If he retires at age 65, the annual benefit amount is $51,633.

We also maintain the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”),SERP, which provides supplemental, nonqualified retirement benefits to executives who (1) had their benefits transferred from a Boeing nonqualified plan to the SERP, and (2) did not elect to convert their SERP benefit into phantom stock units as of June 17, 2005. Benefits under this plan were also frozen as of the date of the Boeing acquisition. There are no SERP annuity benefits presently payable to the NEOs. Mr. Pilla was a participant in the SERP, but elected to convert his SERP benefit as of June 17, 2005, into 16,023 phantom stock units. For additional information, see “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.”

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    5761


Back to Contents

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The following table presents information concerning each of the Company’s defined contribution or other plans that provide for the deferral of compensation of the NEOs on a basis that is not tax-qualified. In addition, and as discussed above under “Pension Benefits,” Mr. Pilla was a participant in the SERP, but elected to convert his SERP benefit as of June 17, 2005, into 16,023 phantom stock units. Mr. Pilla’s vested and undelivered phantom stock units and accrued dividend equivalents are reflected below and may be settled in cash or shares on the earlier of his separation from service or a change-in-control.

Name

Plan

Executive

Contributions

in Last FY

($)

Registrant

Contributions

in Last FY

($)

(1) 

Aggregate

Earnings

in Last FY

($)

(2) 

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

($)

Aggregate

Balance at

Last FYE

($)

 

Plan

Executive

Contributions

in Last FY

($)

Registrant

Contributions

in Last FY

($)

(1) 

Aggregate

Earnings

in Last FY

($)

(2) 

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

($)

Aggregate

Balance at

Last FYE

($)

 

Thomas C. Gentile III

DCP

 

600,000

 

27,143

 

 

1,234,122

(3) 

DCP

 

600,000

 

54,980

 

 

1,889,102

(3) 

Sanjay Kapoor

DCP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jose I. Garcia

DCP

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

100,000

 

Samantha J. Marnick

DCP

 

100,000

 

7,653

 

 

313,122

(4) 

DCP

 

100,000

 

13,020

 

 

426,142

(4)

Duane F. Hawkins

DCP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John A. Pilla

DCP

26,000

 

 

2,450

 

 

97,442

 

DCP

237,489

 

 

10,386

 

 

345,318

(5)

SERP

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,168,557

(5) 

SERP

 

 

 

22,272

 

 

1,190,829

(6)

(1)

These amounts represent Company contributions to the DCP and are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.”

(2)

Under the DCP, these amounts represent earnings on DCP balances from January 1 to December 31, 2018, and are not included in the “Summary Compensation Table.” For Mr. Pilla’s balance under the SERP, represents a decrease om value of $237,942, representing the change in market value of 16,023 phantom stock units and accrued dividend equivalents under the SERP from January 1 to December 31, 2018. The change in market value of the phantom stock units for Mr. Pilla was calculated using the closing prices of Common Stock on January 2, 2018, and December 31, 2018, respectively.

(3)

This amount includes $606,979 consisting of Company contributions and earnings on balances prior to 2018 (and as reported in our 2017 proxy statement).

(4)

This amount includes $205,469 consisting of Company contributions and earnings on balances prior to 2018 (and as reported in our 2017 proxy statement).

(5)

Represents the sum of (i) $1,155,098, which represents the 16,023 phantom stock units under the SERP multiplied by $72.09, the closing price of Common Stock on December 31, 2018, and (ii) $13,459 in accrued dividend equivalents on the phantom stock units under the SERP through December 31, 2018.

(1)

These amounts represent Company contributions to the DCP and are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.”

(2)

Under the DCP, these amounts represent earnings on DCP balances from January 1 to December 31, 2019, and are not included in the “Summary Compensation Table.” For Mr. Pilla’s balance under the SERP, represents an increase in value equal to the change in market value of 16,023 phantom stock units and accrued dividend equivalents under the SERP from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019. The change in market value of the phantom stock units for Mr. Pilla was calculated using the closing prices of Common Stock on December 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively.

(3)

This amount includes $1,234,122 consisting of Company contributions and earnings on balances prior to 2019 (and as reported in last year's proxy statement).

(4)

This amount includes $313,122 consisting of Company contributions and earnings on balances prior to 2019 (and as reported in last year's proxy statement).

(5)

This amount includes $97,442 consisting of earnings on balances prior to 2019 (as reported in last year's proxy statement).

(6)

Represents the sum of (i) $1,167,756, which represents the 16,023 phantom stock units under the SERP multiplied by $72.88, the closing price of Common Stock on December 31, 2019, and (ii) $23,073 in accrued dividend equivalents on the phantom stock units through December 31, 2019.

(1)

These amounts represent Company contributions to the DCP and are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.”

(2)

Under the DCP, these amounts represent earnings on DCP balances from January 1 to December 31, 2019, and are not included in the “Summary Compensation Table.” For Mr. Pilla’s balance under the SERP, represents an increase in value equal to the change in market value of 16,023 phantom stock units and accrued dividend equivalents under the SERP from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019. The change in market value of the phantom stock units for Mr. Pilla was calculated using the closing prices of Common Stock on December 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively.

(3)

This amount includes $1,234,122 consisting of Company contributions and earnings on balances prior to 2019 (and as reported in last year's proxy statement).

(4)

This amount includes $313,122 consisting of Company contributions and earnings on balances prior to 2019 (and as reported in last year's proxy statement).

(5)

This amount includes $97,442 consisting of earnings on balances prior to 2019 (as reported in last year's proxy statement).

(6)

Represents the sum of (i) $1,167,756, which represents the 16,023 phantom stock units under the SERP multiplied by $72.88, the closing price of Common Stock on December 31, 2019, and (ii) $23,073 in accrued dividend equivalents on the phantom stock units through December 31, 2019.

 

More information on the DCP and SERP can be found under “Other Compensation Elements and Information” and “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control.” There were no “above-market” earnings (defined by SEC rule as that portion of interest that exceeds 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate) under the DCP during fiscal year 2018,2019, as the Company used 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate to determine the amounts to be contributed.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    62


Back to Contents

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control

The Company believes competitive severance protection is an appropriate incentive in attracting and retaining talent and, accordingly, has provided for certain termination compensation through individual employment agreements. In addition, when appropriate,While the Company has also agreed to individual severance arrangements at the time of termination of employment, taking into account the specific facts and circumstances of termination. The Company does not maintain any specific change-in-control agreements or other similar plans or arrangements intended specifically to provide income protection for executive officers upon a change-in-control.

In addition, thechange-in-control, that Company maintainshas several programs — the STIP,ACI, LTIP, Perquisite Allowance Program, and DCP — that deliver benefits upon certain types of termination or a change-in-control.

Information about these severance benefits is contained below, followed by a table summarizing the monetary benefits upon triggering events. As Mr. Kapoor left the Company prior to December 31, 2019, his termination benefits are not included below. The details of his Retirement Agreement (and the compensation and payments made thereunder) are set forth under “---Summary Compensation Table - Employment and Separation Agreements.”

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    58


Back to Contents

Employment Agreements

 

Only the employment agreements of Messrs. Gentile and KapoorGarcia provide for any payments to be made, or benefits provided, beyond the date of termination as of December 31, 2018.2019. These benefits are paid only in the circumstances described below. Receipt of these benefits is conditioned upon the execution of a release of claims against the Company and satisfaction of certain covenants, including non-solicitation and non-competition covenants. Pursuant to Mr. Garcia’s employment agreement, the non-solicitation and non-competition covenants apply for two years post-termination. Pursuant to Mr. Gentile’s employment agreement, the non-solicitation and non-competition covenants apply for one year post-termination if terminated without cause or for good reason, or two years post-termination if terminated for any other reason.

Termination by the Company for Cause or by the Employee without Good Reason

Upon a covenanttermination for cause or without good reason, Messrs. Gentile and Garcia are only entitled to their compensation through the date of termination.

For Mr. Gentile, a “for cause” termination is defined as a termination resulting from the following:

(1)

commission of a material breach, acts involving fraud, material and intentional dishonesty, material and intentional unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, a felony or other crime involving moral turpitude, or a material violation of Company policies;

(2)

direct and deliberate acts constituting a material breach of the duty of loyalty;

(3)

refusal or material failure (other than by reason of disability) to perform duties and responsibilities, if such refusal or failure is not remedied within 30 days after receipt of written notice thereof from the Board;

(4)

material underperformance, as reflected in two consecutive written performance reviews not less than six months apart; or

(5)

inability to competeobtain and maintain the appropriate level of U.S. security clearance.

For Mr. Garcia, a covenant“for cause” termination is defined as a termination resulting from the following:

(1)

commission of a material breach that, if curable, is not cured within 10 business days after written notice thereof;

(2)

acts involving moral turpitude, including fraud, material and willful dishonesty, willful and intentional unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, the commission of a felony, or material violation of Company policies;

(3)

direct and deliberate acts constituting a material breach of the duty of loyalty; or

(4)

Willful or continuous refusal, other than by reason of disability, to solicit customers or employees of Spirit.perform the material duties reasonably assigned to Mr. Garcia if such refusal is not remedied within 10 business days after written notice thereof.

Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason

Mr. Gentle is no longer able to terminate his employment for good reason (this benefit ended on April 1, 2019).

Upon a termination by the Company without cause, or for good reason, Messrs. Gentile and Kapoor will beGarcia are entitled to their base salary in effect prior to termination and the costs of providing COBRA medical and dental benefits coverage over a period of 12 months.

In addition, for Mr. Garcia, if such a termination occursthe Company terminates his employment for any reason other than for cause, or he terminates his employment for good reason or due to death or disability, before April 1, 2019,January 9, 2022, the following long-term incentives will vest:

66-2/3% of the RSannual long-term incentive awards granted to Mr. GentileGarcia in 2017 (such vested shares to include any shares that have previously vested under such award), which, as of December 31, 2018, reflects an additional vesting amount of 18,457 shares of Common Stock (18,457 shares under such award already vested in February 2018);2019; and

33-1/3% of the RSannual long-term incentive awards granted to Mr. GentileGarcia in 2018, which,2020, so long as the grant is made on or before the date of December 31, 2018, reflects 13,994termination.

With respect to Mr. Garcia’s cash sign-on award, he received the second installment of $500,000 on January 9, 2020. If Mr. Garcia was terminated without cause, due to death or disability or for good reason prior to the payment date of the second installment, the unpaid amount was required to be paid within 30 days of termination.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    63


Back to Contents

Mr. Garcia received 10,861 shares of Common Stock.

Termination ofStock under the Initial Sign-On RS. Mr. Kapoor dueGarcia was to expiration of his employment agreement without renewal constitutesbe granted the Subsequent Sign-on Award on January 9, 2020. Upon a termination without cause.

A terminationcause, due to death or disability, or for “good reason” is a voluntary termination of employment bygood reason prior to the executive within 90 days after onegrant of the following conditions:

(1)

ForSubsequent Sign-On Award, Mr. Gentile: If he is assignedGarcia was entitled to a diminished position prior to April 1, 2019.

(2)

For Mr. Kapoor: Upon a change-in-control or within 12 months thereafter, the executive is not offered continued employment in a position other than a diminished position.

A position is a “diminished position” if it reflects: (1) a material diminution in base compensation; (2) a material diminution in authority, duties, or responsibilities; (3) a change in reporting requirements; (4) relocationfull vesting of the executive’s principal officeInitial Sign-On RS and, in lieu of granting the Subsequent Sign-On Award, the Company was required to a location greater than 50 miles from Wichita, Kansas; or (5) any action or inaction on Spirit’s part that constitutes a material breach by Spiritpay Mr. Garcia $500,000 in cash within 30 days of the employment agreement.such termination.

For Mr. Kapoor,Garcia, “good reason” means a “change-in-control” means (a) a transaction where any person acquires more than 50% of the Company’s total voting power, or (b) a transaction wheretermination 30 days after the Company sells or transfers all or substantially allhas received notice of, its assetsand failed to a person, if all or substantially all the proceeds are distributed to the Company’s stockholders.

For context, a “for cause” termination is defined as a termination resulting fromcure the following:

(1)

Commission of a material breach diminution in title, duties, role, reporting line, and/or acts involving moral turpitude, fraud, dishonesty, unauthorized disclosureresponsibilities, and/or the assignment of confidential information, the commission of a felony, duties and/or material violations of the Company’s policies;responsibilities inconsistent with his title or role;

(2)

Direct and deliberate acts constituting a material breachreduction of the duty of loyalty;base salary and/or ACI or LTIP opportunity;

(3)

Refusal or material failure (otherrelocation to any place other than by reason of disability) to perform job duties and responsibilities if not remedied within 30 days after receiving written notice thereof;Wichita, Kansas; and/or

(4)

Material underperformance, as reflected in two consecutive performance reviews provided no less than six months apart; or

(5)

Inability to obtain and maintain the appropriate level of U.S. security clearance.

Voluntary Termination without Good Reason

In the event Mr. Gentile had voluntarily terminated his employment witha material breach by the Company before April 1, 2018, any unvested shares of restricted stock that were awarded as a signing bonus under his employment agreement will immediately vest. This provision no longer applies.without notice.

Awards under the Omnibus Incentive Plan: ACI and Long-Term Incentives

 

Annual Cash Incentive

In the event of a “qualifying retirement” that occurs 90 days or more after the beginning of the plan year, the participant will be entitled to receive a prorated ACI based on full-year performance metrics actually achieved for such year. Other than Mr. Pilla, none of the NEOs qualify for this benefit as of December 31, 2018.2019.

In the event of a change-in-control of the Company, each participant who incurs a qualifying“qualifying termination, either in anticipation of the change-in-control or during the period beginning 30 days before the date of the change-in-control and ending two years after the closing of the change-in-control, will be entitled to receive a cash award equal to the full-year ACI that the participant would have been entitled to receive for the year during which such termination occurs had the target performance metrics established for that year been met.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    59


Back to Contents

Long-Term Incentives (Includes One-Time and Sign-On Awards)

Retirement - 2018 and 2019 Long-Term Incentives

Upon a participant’s termination due to “retirement,” the participant will (i) fully vest in outstanding time-based restricted stock awards and (ii) vest in a prorated portion of outstanding performance-based restricted stock awards (prorated based on the number of days continuously employed during the performance period) based on actual performance measured at the end of the applicable performance period. None of our NEOs is currently entitled to these benefits.

DeathorDisability-2018and2019 Long-Term Incentives

In addition to the change-in-control treatment described below, each participant who is terminatedUpon a participant’s termination due to death or disability or retirement (termination afterprior to vesting, the employee has attained age 62)participant will (i) fully vest in his or her outstanding time-based restricted stock awardawards, and (ii) vest in a prorated portion of his or her outstanding performance-based restricted stock award,awards (prorated based on the number of days continuously employed during the performance period) based on target performance in the case of death or disability, and actual performance measured at the end of the applicable performance period in the case of retirement. None of our NEOs are currently entitled to the retirement benefits.

performance.

2017Qualifying andTermination 2018inConnectionwithaChange-in-Control-AllOutstanding Long-Term Incentives

Each participant who incurs a qualifying termination, either in anticipation of the change-in-control or during the period beginning 30 days before the date of the change-in-control and ending two years after the change-in-control,“qualifying termination” will become fully vested upon termination of employment. If an award is subject to performance conditions, the portion that vests will, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, be determined based upon actual performance through the date of the change-in-control (or, if later, the date of the qualifying termination) or, if the Compensation Committee determines that measurement of actual performance cannot be reasonably assessed, the assumed achievement of target performance.

In addition, each such participant who qualifies for accelerated vesting above will also receive a cash award equal to the dollar value of the long-term incentive that would have been made to the participant in the ordinary course of business within the 12-month period following the date of qualifying termination, based on the participant’s annual base pay in effect on the date of qualifying termination.

 

2016Long-TermIncentivesDefinitions:

The unvested long-term incentives“Qualifying termination” means the participant’s termination, either in anticipation of a participant who is employed by Spirit on the date of a change-in-control or whose employment was involuntarily terminated by Spirit (other than for cause) withinduring the ninety (90)period beginning 30 days preceding a change-in-control, become fully vested upon a change-in-control. If an award is subject to performance conditions, the portion that vests will, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, be determined based upon actual performance throughbefore the date of the change-in-control or, ifand ending two years after the Compensation Committee determines that measurement of actual performance cannot be reasonably assessed, the assumed achievement of target performance.

In addition, each such participant who qualifies for accelerated vesting above will also receive a cash award equal to the dollar valueclosing of the long-term incentive that would have been made to the participant in the ordinary course of business within the 12-month period following the date of the change-in-control, based on the participant’s annual base pay in effect on the date of the change-in-control or termination, if earlier.

Definitions:

“Qualifying termination” means a participant’s termination either (i) by the Company without cause, or (ii) by the participant for good reason. 

“Cause” means that the Company has “cause” to terminate the employee, as defined in any applicable employment or consulting agreement, or any of the following has occurred:

(1)

Gross negligence or willful misconduct in the exercise of responsibilities;

(2)

Breach of fiduciary duty;

(3)

Material breach of any provision of an employment contract or consulting agreement;

(4)

The commission of a felony crime or crime involving moral turpitude;

(5)

Theft, fraud, misappropriation, or embezzlement (or reasonable suspicion of the same);

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    64


Back to Contents

(6)

Willful violation of any federal, state, or local law (except traffic violations and other similar matters not involving moral turpitude); or

(7)

Refusal to obey any resolution or direction of the participant’s supervisor or the Board.

“Good reason” means a voluntary termination within ninety (90)90 days after the participant is assigned to a diminished position so long as the participant has, within thirty (30) days after being assigned to such diminished position, notified the Company of the participant’s intent to terminate as a result of such assignment, and within thirty (30) days after receipt of that notice the Company has not reassigned the participant to a position that is not a diminished position.(provided certain conditions are met).

“Diminished position” means a position that reflects any of the following changes or actions, unless the participant has consented to the change or action in writing:

(1)

a material diminution in the participant’s base compensation; (2) a material diminution in the participant’scompensation, authority, duties, or responsibilities, or associated job title; (3)

(2)

relocation of the participant’s principal office to a location that is greater than 50 miles from the location of the participant’s principal office immediately before such relocation; or (4)

(3)

any action or inaction with respect to the terms and conditions of the participant’s service that constitutes a material breach by the

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    60


Back to Contents

Company of any written agreement between the participant and the Company.

“Retirement” is defined foras:

For purposes of the 2018 Long-Term Incentives, as termination on or after the date when the grantee has attained age 62.62; and

For purposes of the 2019 Long-Term Incentives, termination on or after the date when the grantee has attained age 62, other than a termination by the Company for cause or termination by the Company at the time cause exists.

“Qualifying retirement” is defined, for purposes of the ACI, as a voluntary termination of employment on or after attaining the age of 55 with at least 10 years of service with the Company and its affiliates or the age of 60 with at least five years of such service.

A “change-in-control” is

(1)

a transaction pursuant to which a person, or more than one person acting as a group, acquires more than 50% of the total voting power of the stock of the Company, Common Stock; or

(2)

a merger or consolidation involving the Company in which the Company is not the surviving entity, or (3) a transaction that is a sale of all or substantially all the assets of the CompanyCompany’s assets if all or substantially all the proceeds from such transaction are distributed to the stockholders of the Company.

Perquisite Allowance Plan

 

Upon the occurrence of a change-in-control of the Company, an NEOa participant who incurs a qualifying termination (as defined under the OIP above) either in anticipation of the change-in-control or during the period beginning 30 days before the change-in-control and ending two years after the closing of the change-in-control, is entitled to receive a cash award equal to (1) any remaining unused portion of the NEO’sparticipant’s allowance for the calendar year in which the qualifying termination occurs, plus (2) an amount equal to 100% of the NEO’sparticipant’s allowance for the calendar year in which the qualifying termination occurs.

Deferred Compensation Plan

 

Individuals participating in the DCP are entitled to receive payment of amounts credited to their deferred compensation accounts under the DCP upon a separation from service.service (subject to the expiry of any applicable waiting period). However, in the event of a termination for cause (as defined under the OIP), no amounts credited to the employer-match account or employer discretionary contribution amount shall be payable to the participant. Payment to a participant of any employer -matchingemployer-matching or discretionary contributions made under the DCP is subject to compliance by the participant with non-competition, non-solicitation, and confidentiality requirements during the term of the participant’s employment and for so long as the participant receives payments under the DCP. DCP amounts are excluded from the table below.

For purposes of the DCP, a “termination for cause” means a separation from service involving (1) gross negligence or willful misconduct in the exercise of responsibilities; (2) breach of fiduciary duty; (3) material breach of any provision of an employment contract; (4) the commission of a felony crime or crime involving moral turpitude; (5) theft, fraud, misappropriation, or embezzlement (or suspicion of the same); (6) willful violation of any federal, state, or local law (except traffic violations and other similar matters not involving moral turpitude); or (7) refusal to obey any resolution or direction of the participant’s supervisor or the Board.

SERP

 

Pursuant to the SERP, Mr. Pilla holds 16,023 phantom stock units. Upon a “Change-in-Control’’any termination of employment (including for cause) or “Separation from Service’’ following a “Liquidity Event’’ (each as defined in the SERP),change-in-control, Mr. Pilla is entitled to receive payment with respect to each of those phantom stock units in an amount equal to (i) the market value of one share of Class A Common stock in the Company (determined as of the business day immediately preceding the date of payment), plus (ii) the amount of all dividends (other than stock dividends), if any, actually paid on one share of Class A Common stock in the Company during the period from June 16, 2005, through the date payment is made. A “Change-in-Control’’ under the SERP is a transaction pursuant to which a person acquires (i) more than 50% of the total voting power of the stock of the Company,Common Stock, or (ii) all or substantially all the assets of the Company or Spirit AeroSystems, Inc., the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, and all or substantially all the proceeds from such transaction are distributed to the stockholders of the Company. A “Separation from Service’’ under the SERP is the termination of employment, including, without limitation, terminations of employment arise from a person’s death, disability, retirement, discharge (with or without cause), or voluntary termination. A “Liquidity Event’’ under the SERP includes the initial public offering consummated by the Company on November 27, 2006. Thus, Mr. Pilla will be entitled to payment under the SERP with respect to his phantom stock units upon any future “Change-in-Control’’ or “Separation from Service.’’ Payment under the SERP will be made in a single lump sum in cash or Common Stock following the change-in-control or separation from service. Since Mr. Pilla’s SERP phantom stock units are fully vested, they are excluded from the table below.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    6165


Back to Contents

Summary Table-Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control

 

The following table summarizes the value of compensation and benefits payable to each NEO upon termination that would exceed the compensation or benefits generally available to salaried employees. Benefits and payments are calculated using a termination date of December 31, 2018.2019. For equity valuation purposes, the table below uses $72.09,$72.88, the closing price of Common Stock on December 31, 2018.2019. For purposes of presenting amounts payable over a period of time (e.g. salary continuation), the amounts are shown as a single total but not as a present value (i.e., the single sum does not reflect any discount).

 Name

Severance

($)

(1) 

 

ACI

($)

(2) 

 

RS

($)

 

PB One-Time,

PB-TSR and

PB-FCF

($)

 

Cash Award in

Respect of

LTIP Awards

($)

(10) 

 

Perquisite

Allowance

Plan

($)

(11) 

 

Other

Benefits

($)

(12) 

 

Total(13) 

($)

Thomas C. Gentile III

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Involuntary Termination without Cause/ Termination by Executive for Good Reason

1,250,000

 

 

 

2,339,465

(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,713

 

3,589,465

Change-in-Control and Qualifying Termination

 

 

1,737,726

 

5,687,829

(4)

5,810,523

(7)

6,250,000

 

50,000

 

 

 

19,536,078

Death or Disability(14)

 

 

 

 

3,026,627

 

603,793

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,630,356

Sanjay Kapoor(15)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Involuntary Termination without Cause/ Termination by Executive for Good Reason

650,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,699

 

660,699

Termination Upon Expiration of Employment Agreement

650,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,699

 

 

660,699

Change-in-Control

 

 

 

 

548,389

(5)

438,019

(8)

1,950,000

 

 

 

 

 

2,936,407

Change-in-Control and Qualifying Termination

650,000

 

650,000

 

2,428,568

(6)

2,449,903

(9)

1,950,000

 

26,000

 

10,699

 

8,165,170

Death or Disability(14)

 

 

 

 

944,307

 

188,395

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,132,702

Samantha J. Marnick

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change-in-Control

 

 

 

 

285,837

(5)

228,309

(8)

1,182,500

 

 

 

 

 

1,696,646

Change-in-Control and Qualifying Termination

 

 

522,877

 

1,268,279

(6)

1,262,937

(9)

1,182,500

 

26,000

 

 

 

4,262,593

Death or Disability(14)

 

 

 

 

503,693

 

100,493

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

604,186

Duane F. Hawkins

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change-in-Control

 

 

 

��

415,527

(5)

331,830

(8)

1,230,500

 

 

 

 

 

1,977,857

Change-in-Control and Qualifying Termination

 

 

533,685

 

1,599,677

(6)

1,597,005

(9)

1,230,500

 

26,000

 

 

 

4,986,867

Death or Disability(14)

 

 

 

 

595,896

 

118,876

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

714,772

John A. Pilla

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change-in-Control

 

 

 

 

319,647

(5)

255,343

(8)

902,500

 

 

 

1,168,557 

 

2,646,047

Change-in-Control and Qualifying Termination

 

 

456,041

 

1,576,320

(6)

1,111,174

(9)

902,500

 

26,000

 

1,168,557

 

5,240,593

Death or Disability(14)

 

 

 

 

860,971

 

83,528

 

 

 

 

 

1,168,557

 

2,113,057

Qualifying Retirement

 

 

422,978

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,168,557

 

1,591,535

Any Other Termination (including for cause)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,168,557

 

1,168,557

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    62


Back to Contents

(1)

Represents annual base salary for 12 months pursuant to each recipient’s employment agreement. For Mr. Kapoor, with respect to the row titled “Change-in-Control and Qualifying Termination,” represents payment of severance to Mr. Kapoor provided he is not offered continued employment in a position other than a diminished position.

(2)

Under the “Change-in-Control and Qualifying Termination” row, represents a cash amount equal to the value of the full-year ACI that such NEO would have been entitled to receive for 2018 had the target performance metrics for 2018 been met. With respect to Mr. Pilla’s “Qualifying Retirement” row, represents an amount equal to the ACI based on full-year performance metrics actually achieved for the year.

(3)

Represents the sum of the following: (i) a cash amount equal to the remaining portion of 66-2/3% of the RS granted to Mr. Gentile in 2017 (18,457 shares of Common Stock) multiplied by $72.09, and (ii) a cash amount equal to 33-1/3% of the RS granted to Mr. Gentile in 2018 (13,994 shares of Common Stock) multiplied by $72.09.

(4)

Represents a cash amount equal to the unvested shares under Mr. Gentile’s 2017 and 2018 RSs multiplied by $72.09.

(5)

Represents a cash amount equal to the unvested shares under the 2016 RS (awards granted prior to 2017 were subject to a single-trigger vesting) multiplied by $72.09.

(6)

Represents a cash amount equal to the unvested shares under the 2016, 2017, and 2018 RSs multiplied by $72.09.

(7)

Represents the sum of the following: (i) a cash amount equal to the number of target shares in the 2017 PB-TSR multiplied by 190%, the projected payout percentage of the award as of December 31, 2018, multiplied by $72.09, (ii) a cash amount equal to the number of target shares in the 2017 PB-FCF multiplied by 181%, the projected payout percentage of the award as of December 31, 2018, multiplied by $72.09, (iii) a cash amount equal to the number of target shares in the 2018 PB-TSR multiplied by 100%, the projected payout percentage of the award as of December 31, 2018, multiplied by $72.09, (iv) a cash amount equal to the number of target shares in the 2018 PB-FCF multiplied by 0.0%, the projected payout percentage of the award as of December 31, 2018, multiplied by $72.09.

(8)

Represents a cash amount equal to the number of target shares in the 2016 PB-TSR multiplied by 100%, the projected payout percentage of the award as of December 31, 2018, multiplied by $72.09.

(9)

Represents the sum of the amount included in each person’s “Change-in-Control” row plus (i) a cash amount equal to the number of target shares in the 2017 PB-TSR multiplied by 190%, the projected payout percentage of the award as of December 31, 2018, multiplied by $72.09, (ii) a cash amount equal to the number of target shares in the 2017 PB-FCF multiplied by 181%, the projected payout percentage of the award as of December 31, 2018 multiplied by $72.09, (iii) a cash amount equal to the number of target shares in the 2018 PB-TSR multiplied by 100%, the projected payout percentage of the award as of December 31, 2018, multiplied by $72.09, (iv) a cash amount equal to the number of target shares in the 2018 PB-FCF multiplied by 0.0%, the projected payout percentage of the award as of December 31, 2018, multiplied by $72.09.

(10)

Represents a cash amount equal to the value of the full-year long-term incentive that would have been made to such NEO in the ordinary course of business within the 12-month period following the date of the change-in-control or change-in-control and qualifying termination, as applicable, based on the participant’s annual base pay in effect on such date.

(11)

Assumes that each NEO’s allowance for 2018 was entirely unused upon the occurrence of the qualifying termination. Represents a cash award of (i) the remaining 2018 annual allowance, plus (ii) the allowance the NEO would receive for 2019.

(12)

For Messrs. Gentile and Kapoor, represents average monthly contribution toward COBRA medical and dental benefits coverage for 12 months pursuant to each recipient’s employment agreement. For Mr. Pilla, represents a cash amount equal to the 16,023 phantom stock units in the SERP multiplied by $72.09 and accrued dividends on such shares as of December 31, 2018 of $13,459.

(13)

For Messrs. Pilla and Gentile and Ms. Marnick, excludes the balance of the amounts deferred under the DCP, the value of which is reported at “---Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.” For Mr. Pilla, excludes the fully vested payments under the PVP, the present value of which is reported at “---Pension Benefits.”

(14)

In the RS column, represents a cash amount equal to the unvested shares under the 2018 RS multiplied by $72.09. In the PB One-Time, PB-TSR, and PB-FCF column, represents the sum of the following (i) a prorated cash amount equal to the number of target shares in the 2018 PB-TSR multiplied by $72.09, (ii) a prorated cash amount equal to the number of target shares in the 2018 PB-FCF, multiplied by $72.09.

(15)

Mr. Kapoor retired from the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on January 9, 2019.

Name

Severance

($)

(1) 

 

ACI

($)

(2) 

 

RS

($)

 

PB-TSR and

PB-FCF

($)

 

Cash Award 

under LTIP

($)

(9) 

 

Perquisite

Plan

($)

(10) 

 

Other

($)

(11) 

 

Total(12)

($)

Thomas C. Gentile III

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Termination without Cause

1,313,709

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,313,709

Change-in-Control and Qualifying Termination

1,313,709

 

1,873,535

 

6,780,464

(3) 

7,867,303

(6) 

7,150,000

 

50,000

 

 

 

25,035,010

Death or Disability

 

 

 

 

5,435,318

(4) 

1,883,542

(8) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,318,859

Jose I. Garcia

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Termination without Cause or for Good Reason

623,276

 

 

 

389,383

(5) 

240,057

(5) 

 

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

2,252,713

Change-in-Control and Qualifying Termination

623,276

 

615,000

 

1,804,217

(3) 

360,122

(7) 

1,230,000

 

26,000

 

1,000,000

 

5,658,611

Death or Disability

 

 

 

 

1,804,217

(4) 

240,057

(8) 

 

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

3,044,275

Samantha J. Marnick

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change-in-Control and Qualifying Termination

 

 

550,000

 

1,143,050

(3) 

1,366,309

(6) 

1,182,500

 

26,000

 

 

 

4,267,859

Death or Disability

 

 

 

 

901,088

(4) 

312,843

(8) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,213,931

Duane F. Hawkins

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change-in-Control and Qualifying Termination

 

 

535,000

 

1,283,271

(3) 

1,603,019

(6) 

1,230,500

 

26,000

 

 

 

4,677,790

Death or Disability

 

 

 

 

985,994

(4) 

354,453

(8) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,340,446

John A. Pilla

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change-in-Control and Qualifying Termination

 

 

475,000

 

1,208,861

(3) 

1,108,500

(6) 

902,500

 

26,000

 

 

 

3,720,861

Death or Disability

 

 

 

 

1,008,878

(4) 

252,577

(8) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,261,455

Qualifying Retirement

 

 

475,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

475,000

(1)

For Messrs. Gentile and Garcia: Represents annual base salary and COBRA benefits for 12 months pursuant to each recipient’s employment agreement. Under “Change-in-Control and Qualifying Termination,” assumes a termination by the Company without cause under their respective employment agreements.

(2)

Under the “Change-in-Control and Qualifying Termination” row, represents a cash amount equal to the value of the full-year ACI at target performance. With respect to Mr. Pilla’s “Qualifying Retirement” row, represents an amount equal to the ACI based on full-year performance metrics actually achieved for the year.

(3)

Represents a cash amount equal to all unvested RSs multiplied by $72.88.

(4)

Represents a cash amount equal to all unvested 2018 and 2019 RSs multiplied by $72.88.

(5)

Under “RS” column, represents 66 2/3% of Mr. Garcia’s annual 2019 RS multiplied by $72.88. Under “PB-TSR and PB-FCF” column, represents the sum of (i) a cash amount equal to 66 2/3% of Mr. Garcia’s annual 2019 PB-TSR, multiplied by 0%, the projected payout for the award, multiplied by $72.88; and (ii) a cash amount equal to 66 2/3% of Mr. Garcia’s annual 2019 PB-FCF, multiplied by 182%, the projected payout for the award, multiplied by $72.88.

(6)

Represents the sum of cash amounts equal to the target amount of unvested PB-TSRs and PB-FCFs multiplied by $72.88 and multiplied by the following: (i) for the 2019 PB-TSR, 0%, the projected payout for the award; (ii) for the 2019 PB-FCF, 182%, the projected payout for the award; (iii) for the 2018 PB-TSR, 34%, the projected payout for the award; (iv) for the 2018 PB-FCF, 110%, the projected payout for the award; (v) for the 2017 PB-TSR, 120%, the projected payout for the award; and (vi) for the 2017 PB-FCF, 200%, the projected payout for the award.

(7)

For Mr. Garcia, amount assumes a qualifying termination constituting a termination without cause under his employment agreement and represents the sum of (i) a cash amount equal to 66 2/3% of Mr. Garcia’s annual 2019 PB-TSR, multiplied by 0%, the projected payout for the award, multiplied by $72.88; and (ii) a cash amount equal to 66 2/3% of Mr. Garcia’s annual 2019 PB-FCF, multiplied by 182%, the projected payout for the award, multiplied by $72.88.

(8)

For all except Mr. Garcia, represents a prorated cash amount equal to the number of target shares in the 2019 PB-TSR, 2019 PB-FCF, 2018 PB-TSR and 2018 PB-FCF multiplied by $72.88. For Mr. Garcia, represents the sum of (i) a cash amount equal to 66 2/3% of Mr. Garcia’s annual 2019 PB-TSR, multiplied by 0%, the projected payout for the award, multiplied by $72.88; and (ii) a cash amount equal to 66 2/3% of Mr. Garcia’s annual 2019 PB-FCF, multiplied by 182%, the projected payout for the award, multiplied by $72.88.

(9)

Represents a cash amount equal to the value of the full-year long-term incentive that would have been made to such NEO in the ordinary course of business within the 12-month period following the date of the change-in-control and qualifying termination based on the participant’s annual base pay in effect on such date.

(10)

Assumes that each NEO’s allowance for 2019 was entirely unused upon the occurrence of the qualifying termination. Represents a cash award of (i) the remaining 2019 annual allowance, plus (ii) the allowance the NEO would receive for 2020.

(11)

For Mr. Garcia, represents the sum of (i) a cash payment in settlement of his Subsequent Sign-On Award, and (ii) a cash payment of $500,000 of the second tranche of his cash sign-on award due in 2020.

(12)

For Messrs. Garcia, Gentile and Pilla and Ms. Marnick, excludes the balance of the amounts deferred under the DCP, the value of which is reported at “---Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.” For Mr. Pilla, excludes the fully vested SERP phantom stock units, the present value of which is reported at “---Nonqualified Deferred Compensation,” and payments under the PVP, the present value of which is reported at “---Pension Benefits.”

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    6366


Back to Contents

20182019 CEO Pay Ratio

The 20182019 annual total compensation of the Company’s CEO was $9,899,693.$11,072,149. The 20182019 annual total compensation of the median employee (excluding the CEO) was $78,740.$70,486. The ratio between the two amounts is 126:157:1.

The 2018 pay ratio in 2018 was 126:1. The increase is due primarily to the increase in Mr. Gentile’s annual total compensation from $9,899,693 in 2018 to $11,079,149 in 2019, and the decrease in the median employee’s compensation (due to the change in the median employee as described below) from $78,740 in 2019 to $70,486 in 2019.

Determining the Median Employee

 

The Company believes that the ratio of pay included above is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with applicable SEC rules.

Due to a change in individual compensation circumstances, it is no longer appropriate for the Company to use the median employee identified in 2017, and, therefore, the Company has identified a new median employee for 2018.

To identify the median employee in 2018,2019, we reviewed base pay paid to all of our employees as of October 1, 2017December 31, 2019 (the “Pay Ratio Employee Population”). We used base pay as our compensation measure to avoid variations in pay due to overtime worked or other items that may yield one-time pay increases. As a result of such review, we identified 901the 50 middlemost employees with similar median base pay.of the Pay Ratio Employee Population. Subsequently, we reviewed total compensation paid tothe base pay of each of those 90150 employees as of October 12, 2017,December 31, 2019, as reflected in the Company’s payroll records, and estimated total compensation for each of those employees through December 31, 2017.records. Comparing total and expected earningsthe base pay of each of the 90150 employees, we identified 10 employees with similar median pay. In 2018,the eight middlemost employees. For 2019, we studied each of the teneight employees’ specificbase pay and employment circumstancesvariable pay for the year of performance to determine the median and eliminated nineseven employees from the group, including the median employee from 2017, who had significant variations in their pay due to one-time events occurring in 2018.group. The remaining employee from that analysis is our median employee.employee for 2019.

The Pay Ratio Employee Population was the same as the population identified in 2017,2018, and included all U.S. and non-U.S. persons employed by the Company on a full-time, part-time, seasonal, or temporary basis. Further, the Pay Ratio Employee Population excluded independent contractors and leased workers who provide services to the Company but are employed, and whose compensation is determined, by an unaffiliated third party.

In calculating base pay for the Pay Ratio Employee Population and the group of 8 employees, we did not make any assumptions, adjustments (including cost of living adjustments), or estimates with respect to base pay,compensation, and we did not annualize base pay. In calculating the total compensation of each person in the group of 901 employees, we did not make any assumptions or adjustments (including cost of living adjustments), and we did not estimate annualized compensation for any full-time employees who were not employed by us for the full 2017-year2019 year through October 12, 2017.

December 31, 2019. As required by SEC rules, after identifying our median employee, we calculated annual total compensation for both our median employee and our CEO using the same methodology that we used to determine our NEOs’ annual total compensation for the “Summary Compensation Table.”

Given the different methodologies that companies use to determine an estimate of their pay ratio, the estimated ratio reported above should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee establishes and oversees the design and functioning of the Company’s executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section in this Proxy Statement with the Company’s management. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement for the 20192020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and also be incorporated by reference in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2018.2019.

Compensation Committee

Paul E. Fulchino, Chairman
Charles L. Chadwell
Robert D. Johnson

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    6467


Back to Contents

PROPOSAL 3

RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Overview

Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”) conducted the audit of the Company’s accounts for fiscal year 2018.2019. The Audit Committee has selected E&Y as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2019,2020, and the Board is asking the Company’s stockholders to ratify that selection. The Company expects that representatives of E&Y will be present at the Annual Meeting and they may make a statement if they desire to do so. Further, the Company expects that such representatives will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Voting Standard

The affirmative vote of a majority of stockholders present, in person or by proxy, will constitute the stockholders’ non-binding approval with respect to Proposal 3. With respect to Proposal 3, a stockholder may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN.” Abstentions will not be counted as votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” Proposal 3; however, because abstentions will be counted as present at the Annual Meeting,Meeting; therefore, they will have the effect of votes “AGAINST” Proposal 3. Proposal 3 is considered a routine matter under NYSE rules. As a result, brokers who do not receive voting instructions generally may vote on Proposal 3 in their discretion. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote proxies received by them “FOR” the proposal.

If a majority of votes cast on this matter are not cast in favor of the selection of E&Y, the Audit Committee will reconsider the selection of such firm as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the Company’s stockholders vote on an advisory (non-binding) basis in favor of the selection, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, direct the selection of a different independent auditor at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

 

 The Board recommends you vote “FOR” the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of the Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmPolicy

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy governing the pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. Under this policy, the Audit Committee has delegated approval authority to the Chair of the Audit Committee provided the Chair reports all pre-approval decisions in writing to the Audit Committee and the decisions are discussed at the Audit Committee’s next scheduled meeting. In 2018,2019, all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by E&Y were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    6568


Back to Contents

Audit and Other Fees

The fees incurred by the Company, including its majority-owned subsidiaries, for services provided by E&Y in 20172019 and 2018 are set forth below. All the fees set forth below and associated services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee concluded that the provision of the non-audit services listed below was compatible with E&Y’s independence.

December 31,

December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)

2017

($)

2018

($)

2018

($)

2019

($)

Audit Fees(1)

3,724.9

3,822.1

3,822.1

4,480.8

Audit-Related Fees(2)

960.1

1,639.2

1,639.2

628.4

Tax Fees(3)

259.5

206.4

206.4

172.0

All Other Fees(4)

2.0

2.0

2.0

7.2

TOTAL

4,946.5

5,669.7

5,669.7

5,288.4

(1)

Represents fees and expenses for professional services provided in connection with the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and review of the Company’s quarterly financial statements, statutory audits, and advice on accounting matters directly related to the audit.

(2)

For 2018, represents $188.0 in fees related to the implementation of FASB’s new revenue recognition standard, $43.5 in fees related to the implementation of FASB’s new leasing standard, $1,333.1 in fees related to merger and acquisition analysis, and $74.6 in fees related to comfort letters. For 2017, represents $575.3 in fees related to implementation of FASB’s new revenue recognition standard, $367.0 related to merger and acquisition analysis, and $17.8 in fees related to Exchange Act filings, comfort letters, and related matters. 2017 fees related to merger and acquisition analysis were reclassified from All Other Fees to Audit-Related Fees to be consistent with 2018 presentation.

(3)

Represents fees and expenses for tax consultations and advice related to compliance with tax laws and tax-planning strategies.

(4)

For 2018 and 2017, represents fees related to research tools. 2017 fees related to merger and acquisition analysis were reclassified from All Other Fees to Audit-Related Fees to be consistent with 2018 presentation.

(1)

Represents fees and expenses for professional services provided in connection with the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and review of the Company’s quarterly financial statements, statutory audits, and advice on accounting matters directly related to the audit.

(2)

For 2019, represents fees related to merger and acquisition analysis. For 2018, represents $188.0 in fees related to the implementation of FASB’s new revenue recognition standard, $43.5 in fees related to the implementation of FASB’s new leasing standard, $1,333.1 in fees related to merger and acquisition analysis, and $74.6 in fees related to comfort letters.

(3)

Represents fees and expenses for tax consultations and advice related to compliance with tax laws and tax-planning strategies.

(4)

Represents fees related to research tools.

(1)

Represents fees and expenses for professional services provided in connection with the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and review of the Company’s quarterly financial statements, statutory audits, and advice on accounting matters directly related to the audit.

(2)

For 2019, represents fees related to merger and acquisition analysis. For 2018, represents $188.0 in fees related to the implementation of FASB’s new revenue recognition standard, $43.5 in fees related to the implementation of FASB’s new leasing standard, $1,333.1 in fees related to merger and acquisition analysis, and $74.6 in fees related to comfort letters.

(3)

Represents fees and expenses for tax consultations and advice related to compliance with tax laws and tax-planning strategies.

(4)

Represents fees related to research tools.

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee currently consists of threefour non-employee directors. Each of the Audit Committee members satisfies the NYSE’s requirements with respect to independence and financial literacyliteracy. Mses. Esteves and qualifiesWright and Mr. Plueger qualify as an audit committee financial expertexperts as defined by the SEC. The responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in its charter, which is available on our website at http://investor.spiritaero.com/govdocs. The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee met nineeight times in 2018.2019.

The Company’s management is responsible for preparing and presenting the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and developing and maintaining the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal auditors are responsible for conducting internal audits intended to evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of this system. Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”),&Y, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2018,2019, is responsible for auditing the Company’s consolidated financial statements and issuing an opinion as to whether the financial statements fairly present the Company’s financial position in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. E&Y is also responsible for auditing the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee has:

Reviewed and discussed with management and E&Y the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018,2019, as well as the representations of management regarding the Company’s internal control over financial reporting;

Reviewed and discussed with E&Y all items required by the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), including the Statement on Auditing Standards, No. 61, as amended by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU section 380, as adopted by the PCAOB in Rule 3200T, CommunicationwithAuditCommittees; and

Received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from E&Y required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding E&Y’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee has discussed with E&Y its independence from the Company and its management.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements referred to above be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018,2019, for filing with the SEC, and the Board approved the Audit Committee’s recommendation. The Audit Committee selected E&Y as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2019.2020.

Audit Committee
Irene M. Esteves, Chair
Stephen A. Cambone
John L. Plueger
Laura H. Wright

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    6669


Back to Contents

PROPOSAL 4

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL: ENHANCE SHAREHOLDER PROXY ACCESSLET STOCKHOLDERS VOTE ON BYLAW AMENDMENTS

Stockholder Proposal

John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, California, 90278, beneficial owner of 100 shares of Common Stock, is the proponent of the following stockholder proposal:

Resolved: Stockholders askShareholders request that the Board of Directors take the steps necessary to adopt a bylaw that requires any amendment to the bylaws, that is approved by the board, shall be subject to a non-binding shareholder vote as soon as practical unless such amendment is already subject to a binding vote.

It is important that bylaw amendments take into consideration the impact that such amendments can have on reducing the accountability of directors and managers and/or on limiting the rights of shareholders, For example, Directors could adopt a narrowly crafted exclusive forum bylaw to amend itssuit the unique circumstances of the company.

A proxy accessadvisor recently adopted a policy to vote against directors who unilaterally adopt bylaw provisions or amendments to the articles of incorporation that materially diminish shareholder rights.

If our directors are opposed to this proposal then it would be useful for our directors to give recent examples of companies whose directors took the initiative and any associated documents, to include the following change:

adopted bylaws that primarily benefited shareholders. A shareholder proxy access director candidate shall not need to obtain a specific percentage vote in order to qualify as a shareholder proxy access director candidate at any future shareholder meeting.

This proposal is important because a shareholder proxy access candidate might not get a 25%-vote even if he or she is the most qualified candidate to join our Boardbest form of Directors. Currently, a proxy access director candidate must obtain a 25% vote or that candidate is disqualifiedshareholder engagement because every shareholder has an opportunity to be a candidate in the following year.

Shareholders may simply believe that at the time of the annual meeting that the company is not ripe for a proxy access candidate and hence may not vote in favor of the candidate simply because the timing is not right. A year later a majority of shareholders might determine that the timing is right and hence they should not be deprived of voting for the most qualified candidate.

The following are just a few of the companies that do not require a proxy access director candidate to obtain a specific percentage vote:

Citigroup (C)
eBay (EBAY)
FedEx (FDX)
Goodyear (GT)
Home Depot (HD)heard.

Please vote yes: Enhance Shareholder Proxy Accessto improve shareholder engagement: Let Shareholders Vote on Bylaw Amendments — Proposal 4.

The Board of Directors’ Statement in Opposition

The Company is committed to robust corporate governance practices and stockholder rights with appropriate safeguards against abuse. In November 2016, after carefulAfter consideration, the Board adopted its proxy access bylaw. The bylaw permits a stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, owning 3% or more of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock continuously for at least three years, to nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials directors constituting up to the greater of 2 individuals or 20% of the Company’s Board of Directors providedhas concluded that the stockholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy certain requirements. The Board believes that the Company’s current proxy access bylaw, including the minimum leveladoption of support for renomination that Proposal 4 seeks to eliminate, provides meaningful and robust proxy access rights to our stockholders with appropriate safeguards against abuse by stockholders with special interests that are not shared by a significant percentage of our stockholders. Further, a majority of our peer group and S&P 500 index companies that have adopted proxy access bylaws also require a minimum level of support for renomination. Implementation of the change sought by Proposal 4 would make the Company an outlier among public companies that have adopted proxy access.

The Board believes this proposal is not in the best interestinterests of our stockholders.

First, the Company’s bylaws and the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) grant stockholders because it will effectively eliminate onethe unfettered right to amend the Company’s bylaws. This right is separate from the Board’s right to amend the bylaws. As stated in DGCL Section 109, the fact that the Board also has the power to amend the Company’s bylaws “shall not divest the stockholders or members of the safeguards against abusepower, nor limit their power to adopt, amend or repeal bylaws.” If the Board adopts a bylaw amendment that the stockholders do not believe to be in their best interests, stockholders are able to take action at a special or annual meeting and repeal the amendment. This is the framework seen in the vast majority of the proxy access process by small groups of stockholders. The provision that Proposal 4 seekslargest U.S. public companies due to eliminate states that a proxy access nominee who does not receive at least 25% ofits flexibility, which both allows the votes cast in favor ofboard to act quickly and the nominee’s election at an annual meeting cannot be renominated forstockholders to amend the next 2 years. Thebylaws if deemed appropriate or needed to protect rights.

Second, requiring the Board believes this provision is reasonable because each timeto hold a stockholder nominates a director nominee using proxy access, it will require a commitment of time and resources by the Board and Governance Committee in order to effectively evaluate the candidate. As described under “Board and Governance Matters — Board Composition” in this Proxy Statement, the Governance Committee and Board engage in a thorough evaluation process with respect to each nominee, including those nominated by stockholders. Once that evaluation is completed, the Company would expend further time and resources putting together appropriate proxy materials with respectvote for every amendment to the nominee. The safeguard Proposal 4 seeksbylaws would result in an administrative burden to eliminate ensures that the Company’s time and money will not be devoted to nominees who only represent narrow, unpopular interests that appeal to less than 25% of our stockholder base. Generally, as was the case in 2018, our director nominees are elected by a significant margin above 90%. A nominee vote of less than 25% of our stockholders would represent a clear departure from that trend, and continuing to put such candidate up for election in subsequent years would put the Company and stockholders through the unnecessary expense and effort of responding consecutively to proxy access for a particular candidate whom stockholders did not elect or meaningfully support. Further, this provision does not prevent any such director nominee from being renominated in the third year following his or her original nomination.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    67


Back to Contents

The Board believes that the Company’s current proxy access bylaw reflects an appropriate balance between stockholder rights and misuse of the proxy access right that is fair to both the Company and its stockholders. Preparing for and conducting excess stockholders meetings is expensive and distracting for the Company. As an example, preparing for the Company’s 2019 stockholder meeting cost the Company more than $100,000. Furthermore, the bylaws contain procedural and administrative matters and amendments are often administrative or clerical in nature (involving updates to Delaware law or fixing provisions that are outdated or off-market); involving the stockholders in such matters wastes their time. Such amendments should be handled quickly and inexpensively through a Board vote, without the unnecessary expense of a stockholder meeting and in order to adopt the amendment within the time frame necessary. Furthermore, in adopting any such amendments, the Board has and is committed to acting in full alignment with its fiduciary duties to the Company and its stockholders.

Third, the Board’s strong governance practices and effective stockholder engagement program reflect its dedication to protecting and, when appropriate, enhancing stockholder rights, ensuring the stockholders have an opportunity to be heard, and maintaining accountability to stockholders and other stakeholders. The Board is committed to continuing its robust approach to governance and consistently reviews new and emerging corporate governance practices to determine if such practices would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. To the extent the stockholders believe the Board is not acting in their interests, they are free to communicate with the Company’s leadership, nominate new director candidates, or vote against all or certain directors at the upcoming annual meeting. Further, under the bylaws, any director who fails to receive the requisite number of votes for election is required to promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board.

For the reasons noted above, the Board requests that you vote “AGAINST” the foregoing stockholder proposal, Proposal 4.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    70


Back to Contents

Voting Standard

The affirmative vote of a majority of stockholders present, in person or by proxy, will constitute the stockholders’ non-binding approval with respect to Proposal 4.

With respect to Proposal 4, a stockholder may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN.” Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” Proposal 4. However, because abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present at the Annual Meeting,Meeting; therefore, they will have the effect of votes “AGAINST” Proposal 4.

Under the rules of the NYSE, brokers are prohibited from giving proxies to vote on non-routine matters unless the beneficial owner of such shares has given voting instructions on the matter. This means that if your broker is the record holder of your shares, you must give voting instructions to your broker with respect to Proposal 4 if you want your broker to vote your shares on the matter.

TheBoardrecommendsthatyouvote “AGAINST” “AGAINST”theforegoingstockholderproposal.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    6871


Back to Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE ANNUAL MEETING

Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting and Voting

Why am I being asked to vote?

 

The Company’s Board of Directors is asking you to vote with respect to proposals being presented at the Company’s Annual Meeting. You may either vote in person at the Annual Meeting, via the internet, by phone, or if you received a paper copy of the materials, by returning a proxy card or voting informationinstruction form. If you want to vote in person by attending the Annual Meeting, please read “How do I attend the Annual Meeting?”

Who can vote at the Annual Meeting?

 

You are entitled to vote if our records show that you were a stockholder of record as of the record date, February 25, 201924, 2020 (the “Record Date”). On the Record Date, there were 105,671,395104,744,137 shares of Common Stock outstanding. Each outstanding share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote.

Why did I receive a Notice and not a full set of materials?

We primarily deliver our proxy materials to stockholders over the internet by using “notice and access” delivery, rather than mailing paper copies to each stockholder. Using this method has reduced our printing and mailing costs and the impact of our Proxy Statement on the environment. If you received a Notice by mail or email, you will not receive a paper copy of the proxy materials or Annual Report unless you request one. Instead, the Notice will tell you how to access these materials over the internet. If you received a Notice and would like to request a full set of printed materials, you may do so by following the instructions provided under “How do I request a printed set of proxy materials?”

If you are a beneficial owner, the Notice has been forwarded to you by your broker or bank, who is considered, with respect to your shares, the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, or other holder of record as to how to vote your shares.

How do I view the Proxy Statement online?

 

Go to http://www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions to view the materials.

How docan I request a printed set of proxy materials?vote my shares?

 

You can easily request a paper copy of the proxy materials at no cost to you using one of the following methods:

BY INTERNET

Visit www.proxyvote.com

BYMOBILE EMAILDEVICE

To sendmaterial@proxyvote.com

BYTELEPHONE

Toll-free at 1-800-579-1639

You will need to provide the 16-digit control number printed in the box marked by the arrow located on the Notice. When sending your request by email, send a blank email with the 16-digit control number in the subject line.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    69


Back to Contents

How can I vote my shares?

BYINTERNET

VIACOMPUTERUse your tablet or smartphone
Visit www.proxyvote.com

BYINTERNET

VIATABLETORSMARTPHONEto scan the QR code above

BY MAIL

If you received a paper copy
of the materials, completeComplete
and return the enclosed
proxy card or voting
instruction form

BYPHONE

Call 1-800-690-6903

IN PERSON

Vote in person at the
Annual Meeting; see
“How do I
Attend the Annual
Meeting”

You are encouraged to read all the proxy materials before voting your shares as they contain important information for making an informed voting decision.areencouragedtoreadalltheproxymaterialsbeforevotingyoursharesastheycontainimportantinformationformakinganinformedvotingdecision.

How many shares must be present to hold the meeting?

 

A quorum is necessary for us to hold the Annual Meeting. A quorum is the presence, in person or by proxy, of stockholders entitled to cast a majority of the votes that all stockholders are entitled to vote. Your shares will be counted as being present for purposes of determining a quorum if you attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person or properly return proxy instructions. Abstentions (where you abstain from voting) will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum. Further, the Company will also count broker non-votes for the purpose of determining the presence or absence of a quorum. Broker non-votes occur when a person holding shares through a bank or brokerage account does not provide instructions as to how his or her shares should be voted and the broker does not exercise discretion to vote those shares on a particular matter.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    72


Back to Contents

What vote is required to approve each item?

 

For Proposal 1 — the Election of Directors — a director nominee will be elected if the votes “FOR” that nominee exceed the votes “AGAINST” that nominee. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the proposal.

Proposals 2 through 4 require the affirmative “FOR” vote of a majority of shares present, in person or by proxy. With respect to Proposals 2 and 4, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote against the proposal. With respect to Proposal 3, abstentions will have the effect of a vote against the proposal. No broker non-votes are expected in connection with Proposal 3 since, due to its routine nature, brokers may vote in their discretion.

How do I vote as a beneficial owner?

 

If you hold your stock as a beneficial owner, you may vote as provided under “How can I vote my shares?” If you want to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank, or other nominee and bring it to the meeting, and submit it with your vote. If you do not submit voting instructions to your broker, bank, or other nominee, your broker, bank, or other nominee will not be permitted to vote your shares in their discretion on Proposal 1, 2, or 4, but may still be permitted to vote your shares in their discretion on Proposal 3.

Why did I receive more than one proxy card or voting information form, or Notice?instruction form?

 

If you received more than one proxy card or voting informationinstruction form, or Notice, you own shares in more than one account. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, please vote each account separately as set forth under “How can I vote my shares?”

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    70


Back to Contents

If I vote by proxy, what voting options do I have?

 

The Board-designated proxies are Robert D. Johnson and Stacy Cozad. With respect to all proposals, you may instruct the proxies to vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” each proposal, or you may instruct the proxies to “ABSTAIN” from voting. The shares will be voted in accordance with the instructions specified on the proxy card or voting informationinstruction form. If no instructions are provided, your shares will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors: “FOR” each director nominee, “FOR” the advisory vote to approve NEO compensation, “FOR” ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm, and “AGAINST” the stockholder proposal.

Can I change my vote?

 

Before the Annual Meeting, you have the power to revoke your proxy and change your vote. If you hold your shares in street name, you must follow the instructions of your broker, bank, or other nominee to revoke your proxy. If you are a holder of record and wish to revoke your proxy, you must provide instructions by internet, in writing to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc., 3801 S. Oliver St., Wichita, KS 67210-2112, or by voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

Who counts the votes?

 

Votes will be received and tabulated by Broadridge, the Company’s inspector of electionselection for the Annual Meeting.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    73


Back to Contents

How do I attend the Annual Meeting?

 

To attend the meeting, you must be a stockholder as of the Record Date. For stockholders of record who received a paper copy of the proxy materials, theThe top half of your proxy card is your admission ticket. For stockholders of record who received a Notice, please request an admission ticket by writing to the Corporate Secretary, Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc., 3801 S. Oliver St., Wichita, KS 67210-2112 or email CorporateSecretary@spiritaero.com. Your request must be received by the close of business on April 23, 2019. At the meeting, we will request a government-issued photo identification and confirm your Common Stock ownership against our list of registered stockholders.

If you hold your shares in street name, you will need to request an admission ticket in writing as set forth above and will need to bring proof of Common Stock ownership to be admitted to the meeting. A recent brokerage statement or a letter from your bank or broker are examples of proof of ownership. If you want to vote your shares held in street name in person, you must get a legal proxy in your name from the broker, bank, or other nominee that holds your shares, and submit it with your vote.

Please note that the use of cameras at the Annual Meeting is prohibited, and cameras will not be allowed into the meeting or any other related areas, except by credentialed media. We realize that many cellular phones and other wireless mobile devices have built-in digital cameras, and while these devices may be brought into the venue, the camera function may not be used at any time.

***

While we intend to hold the meeting in person at this time, we are closely monitoring the coronavirus, or COVID-19, situation. If it becomes necessary for us to hold the meeting by means of remote communication, we will announce that decision promptly, and details on how to participate will be available at https://www.spiritaero.com/2020-annual-meeting.

***

What is householding?

 

SEC rules permit us to deliver a single copy of proxy materials to stockholders residing at the same address unless the stockholders have notified us to deliver multiple copies. This allows us to eliminate multiple unnecessary mailings. If this situation applies to you and you want to receive more than one set of proxy materials, please let us know by following the applicable instructions below:

Registered stockholders who wish to receive a separate set of proxy materials in the future should contact Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. by calling 1-866-540-7095 or writing to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717, Attention: Householding Department.

Beneficial shareholdersstockholders who wish to receive a separate set of proxy materials in the future should contact their broker, bank, or other holder of record.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    71


Back to Contents

Who is paying for this proxy solicitation?

 

The Company is soliciting the proxies accompanying this Proxy Statement. Proxies may be solicited by officers, directors, and regular supervisory and executive employees of Spirit, none of whom will receive any additional compensation for their services. We have retained D.F. King & Co., Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $15,000 plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. The Company will pay persons holding shares of Common Stock in their names or in the names of nominees, but not owning such shares beneficially, such as brokerage houses, banks, and other fiduciaries, for the expense of forwarding solicitation materials to their principals. All the costs of solicitation of proxies will be paid by the Company.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    74


Back to Contents

What happens if an incumbent director nominee is not elected at the Annual Meeting?

 

If an incumbent director nominee is not elected and no one is elected in his or her place, then, under Delaware General Corporation Law,the DGCL, the director would continue to serve as a “hold-over director.” Under our bylaws, the director is required to tender his resignation to the Board. Upon receipt of the resignation, the Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the Board as to whether to accept or reject the resignation. In considering the tendered resignation, the Board will consider the Governance Committee’s recommendation as well as any other factors it deems relevant, which may include:

The qualifications of the director whose resignation has been tendered;

The director’s past and expected future contributions to the Company;

The overall composition of the Board and its committees;

Whether accepting the tendered resignation would cause the Company to fail to meet any applicable rule or regulation (including the NYSE listing standards and federal securities laws); and

The percentage of outstanding shares represented by the votes cast at the Annual Meeting.

The Board will act on a tendered resignation within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote for the Annual Meeting, and will promptly disclose its decision and rationale as to whether to accept the resignation (or the reasons for rejecting the resignation, if applicable) in a press release, in a filing with the SEC, or by other public announcement, which may include a posting on the Company’s website.

If a director’s resignation is accepted by the Board, or if a nominee for director who is not an incumbent director is not elected, the Board may fill the resulting vacancy or may decrease the size of the Board pursuant to the Company’s bylaws.

Where can I find the voting results after the Annual Meeting?

 

Prior to the conclusion of the Annual Meeting, we will announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting. Final voting results will be disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days following the Annual Meeting.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    7275


Back to Contents

Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for the 20202021 Annual Meeting

Proposals of stockholdersStockholder proposals intended to be included in the Company’s proxy statement for presentation at the Company’s 20202021 annual meeting of stockholders must be received by the Company at its offices no later than November 12, 201920, 2020 (120 days preceding the one-year anniversary of the Mailing Date) and must otherwise comply with SEC rules in order to be eligible for inclusion in the proxy statement for the 20202021 annual meeting of stockholders.

In addition, pursuant to the Company’s bylaws, a stockholder desiring to propose any matter for consideration at the 20202021 annual meeting of stockholders, other than through inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials, must notify the Company’s Corporate Secretary at the Company’s offices on or before December 26, 201924, 2020 (120 days prior to the one-year anniversary of the immediately preceding annual meeting).

Pursuant to our bylaws, a stockholder may nominate an individual for election as a director at the 20202021 annual meeting of stockholders by providing notice to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at the address set forth below by December 26, 201924, 2020 (120 days preceding the one-year anniversary of the immediately preceding annual meeting) (the “Nominee Deadline”). Further, pursuant to the Company’s proxy access right, a stockholder may elect to have their nominee included in the Company’s proxy statement if the stockholder provides notice to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at the address set forth below by the Nominee Deadline and expressly elects to have such nominee included in the Company’s proxy materials pursuant to Section 1.13 of the Company’s bylaws. Any notice of a nomination must be made in compliance with the procedures required by the Company’s bylaws.

Stockholder recommendations and nominations for candidates to the Board as described above should be sent to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at 3801 S. Oliver St., Wichita, KS 67210-2112.

Annual Report

The Company’s 20182020 Annual Report on Form 10-K hasbeenmailedtoyouwiththeProxyStatement,andisalso available at http://www.spiritaero.com. The Company will provide to any stockholder, without charge, a paper copy of the 20182019 Annual Report on Form 10-K upon written request to Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc., Corporate Secretary, 3801 S. Oliver St., Wichita, KS 67210-2112.

By order of the Board of Directors.
Sincerely,

Stacy Cozad
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, and Corporate Secretary
Spirit AeroSystems Holdings,Inc.

March 11, 201920, 2020

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    7376


Back to Contents

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Proxy Statement includes “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “aim,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “objective,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would,” and other similar words or phrases, or the negative thereof, unless the context requires otherwise. These statements reflect management’s current views with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties, both known and unknown, including, but not limited to, those described in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our actual results may vary materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward-looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following:

1

the timing and conditions surrounding the return to service of the B737 MAX, the B737 MAX production rates under the 2020 MOA and other agreements with Boeing, future demand for the aircraft, and any residual impacts of the grounding on production rates for the aircraft;

2

our reliance on Boeing for a significant portion of our revenues;

3

our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs;

our ability to performenter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers;

4

the business condition and liquidity of Boeing and Airbus and their ability to satisfy their contractual obligations to the Company;

5

demand for our obligations under our newproducts and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs,services and the related recurring production, including our ability to meet contractually required production rate increases;effect of economic or geopolitical conditions, or other events, such as pandemics, in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally;

6

the certainty of our backlog, including the ability of customers to cancel or delay orders prior to shipment;

7

our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, margins, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program and other programs;

margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs;

8

our ability and our suppliers’ ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft and expanding model mixes;aircraft;

9

the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest;

customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise;

the effect of economiccompetitive conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate, in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;in-sourcing by commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers;

10

our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing, Airbus and other customers;

11

the success and timely execution of key milestones, such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals includingand satisfaction of closing conditions, in our announced acquisitions of Asco and select Bombardier assets, and our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory oreffectively assess, manage, close, and integrate such acquisitions along with others that we pursue, and generate synergies and other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco,cost savings therefrom, while avoiding unexpected costs, charges, expenses, and customer adherenceadverse changes to their announced schedules;business relationships and business disruptions;

12

the possibility that our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing undercash flows may not be adequate for our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers;additional capital needs;

our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers;

the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements, including our ability to timely deliver quality products, under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of non-payment by such customers;

any adverse impact on Boeing’s and Airbus’ production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism;

any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks;

13

our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks information technology failures, orand other operations disruptions;

14

returns on pension plan assetslegislative or regulatory actions, both domestic and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations;foreign, impacting our operations;

our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all;

competition from or in-sourcing by commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and competition from other aerostructures suppliers;

the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad;

15

the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto,laws and the Company’s ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes;

16

any reduction in our credit ratings;

17

our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components;

18

our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly skilled employees and employees;

19

our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees, including our ability to avoid labor disputes and work stoppages with respect to our union employees;

20

spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense;

21

the possibility that our cash flowspension plan assumptions and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on and principal of our indebtedness;

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2019 Proxy Statement    74


Back to Contents

our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially;future contributions;

the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs;

22

the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; and any difficulties or delays that could affect the Company’s ability to effectively implement the remediation plan, in whole or in part, to address the material weakness identified in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as described in Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures” of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2019;

23

the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions;

actions, including our exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims;

our ability to effectively assess, manage, and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings;

the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, and adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition;

24

our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program;programs;

25

our ability to access the capital markets to fund our liquidity needs, and the costs and terms of any additional financing;

26

any regulatory or legal action arising from the review of our accounting processes; and

27

the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, trade restrictions, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; andpolicies.

prolonged periods of inflation where we do not have adequate inflation protection in our customer contracts, among other things.SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 2020 Proxy Statement    77


Back to Contents

These factors are not exhaustive and it is not possible for us to predict all factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in our forward-looking statements. These factors speak only as of the date hereof, and new factors may emerge or changes to the foregoing factors may occur that could impact our business. As with any projection or forecast, these statements are inherently susceptible to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to, and expressly disclaim any obligation to, publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. You should review carefully the sections captioned “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more complete discussion of these and other factors that may affect our business.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    7578


Back to Contents

APPENDIX A

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Overview

 

In addition to reporting our financial information in our Annual Report on Form 10-K using U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), certain non-GAAP financial measures (which are indicated generally by * in this Proxy Statement) are used with respect to our ACIAnnual Cash Incentive and long-term incentives. Such non-GAAP financial measures include (i) free cash flow (“Free Cash Flow”), (ii) adjusted free cash flow (“Adjusted FCF”), (iii) adjusted earnings before interest and taxes (“Adjusted EBIT”), and (iv) free cash flow as a percentage of revenue (“FCF Percentage”), which are described further below. The Company does not intend for the information to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the related GAAP financial measures. Other companies may define and calculate the measures differently than we do, limiting the usefulness of the measures for comparison with other companies.

Cash Flow Measures and Reconciliation: Free Cash Flow and Adjusted FCF

 

Free Cash Flow

Free Cash Flow is defined as GAAP cash from operating activities, less capital expenditures for property, plant, and equipment. Management believes Free Cash Flow provides investors with an important perspective on the cash available for stockholders, debt repayment, and acquisitions after making the capital investments required to support ongoing business operations and long-term value creation. Free Cash Flow does not represent the residual cash flow available for discretionary expenditures as it excludes certain mandatory expenditures. Management uses Free Cash Flow as a measure to assess both business performance and overall liquidity.

Free Cash Flow Percentage

FCF Percentage is the Company’s Free Cash Flow (as defined under “Free Cash Flow” above)or Adjusted FCF, as appropriate, as a percentage of revenue over a three-year performance period (cumulative Free Cash FlowFlow/Adjusted FCF over the performance period divided by cumulative GAAP revenue over the performance period). This metric is used to align long-term incentives with a key valuation driver of our business, which is Free Cash Flow. Since the Company does not provide multi-year Free Cash Flow guidance, aFlow/Adjusted FCF. A percentage of sales is used to drive sustained cash flow performance consistent with our established long-term goal of 7-9% of revenue. We use Free Cash Flow to calculate FCF Percentage under the FCF Percentage long-term incentive.

Adjusted FCF

Management considers certain items that arise from time to time to be outside the ordinary course of our operations. Management believes that excluding these items provides a better understanding of the underlying trends in the Company’s operating performance and allows more accurate comparisons of the Company’s operating results to historical performance. Accordingly, Adjusted FCF is defined as Free Cash Flow lessadjusted for these special items. The most comparable GAAP measure is cash provided by operating activities. The tables below provide reconciliations between the GAAP and non-GAAP measures.

Reconciliation

The table below presents a reconciliation of Free Cash Flow and Adjusted FCF to cash from operating activities for each of the periods presented, and also demonstrates a reconciliation of FCF Percentage.

($ in millions)

Fiscal Year Ended

December 31,

 

As a Percentage of Revenue

Fiscal Year Ended

December 31,

 

As a Percentage of Revenue

 

2018

 

2017

 

2016

 

 

2018

 

2017

 

2016

2019

 

2018

 

2017

 

 

2019

 

2018

 

2017

 

Cash from Operating Activities

770

 

574

 

717

 

 

11%

 

8%

 

11%

923

 

770

 

574

 

 

12%

 

11

%

8

%

Capital Expenditures

(271

)

(273

)

(254

)

 

4%

 

4%

 

4%

(232)

 

(271

)

(273

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Free Cash Flow (Used for FCF Percentage)

499

 

301

 

463

 

 

7%

 

4%

 

7%

Cash (Received)/Returned under 787 Interim Pricing Agreement

 

 

236

 

(43

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs Related to Asco Acquisition

66

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Free Cash Flow

691

 

499

 

301

 

 

9%

 

7

%

4

%

Cash Received under B787 Interim Pricing Agreement

 

 

 

 

236

 

 

9%

 

7

%

7.7

%

Costs Related to Planned Acquisitions

32

 

66

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted FCF

565

 

537

 

420

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

723

 

565

 

537

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    7679


Back to Contents

Adjusted EBIT and Reconciliation

 

As presented in this Proxy Statement, Adjusted EBIT is defined as earnings before interest and taxes as adjusted to exclude certain non-operating and/or non-recurring items that the Company believes are not reflective of operating performance. The table below presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBIT to net income (loss) for each of the periods presented.

($ in millions)

Fiscal Year Ended

December 31,

2019

 

2018

 

2017

 

Net Income

530.1

 

617.0

 

354.9

 

Interest Expense and Financing Fee Amortization

91.9

 

80.0

 

41.7

 

Income Tax Provision

132.8

 

139.8

 

180.0

 

Equity in Net Income of Non-Wholly Owned Affiliates

0.2

 

(0.6

)

(0.3

)

Interest Income

(12.9)

 

(8.0

)

(6.4

)

EBIT

742.1

 

828.2

 

569.9

 

Impact From Severe Weather Event

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other(1)

62.6

 

51.7

 

346.0

 

Adjusted EBIT

804.7

 

879.9

 

915.9

 

(1)

For 2019, includes $55.9 million related to impact of planned acquisitions, and $6.7 million of voluntary retirement program expenses. For 2018, represents impact of planned acquisitions. For 2017, represents the 2017 Boeing agreement.

($ in millions)Fiscal Year Ended
December 31,
2018 2017 2016 
Net Income617.0 354.9 469.7 
Interest Expense and Financing Fee Amortization80.0 41.7 53.7 
Income Tax Provision139.8 180.0 192.1 
Equity in Net (Income) Loss of Non-Wholly Owned Affiliates(0.6) (0.3)(1.3)
Interest Income(8.0) (6.4)  
EBIT828.2 569.9 714.2 
Impact From Severe Weather Event    12.1 
Other(1)51.7 346.0 176.3 
Adjusted EBIT879.9 915.9 902.6 
(1)
Includes adjustments to reflect expenses related to the Asco acquisition and related debt financing, customer settlements, amounts paid to our former CEO upon his retirement, and other non-recurring items.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS - 20192020 Proxy Statement    7780


Back to Contents

 


Back to Contents


Back to Contents